My name is Scott Jewers. I am a technical expert with 18 years of experience in systems analysis, programming, and IT.
My evidence, analysis, and pattern-matching consistently indicate foreign interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections involving actors in — but not limited to — China, Russia, and the United States, as well as domestic interference and the protection of foreign nationals. The evidence further indicates that certain portions of the Canadian Government and its institutions planted evidence on my personal devices, including setting my GPS location to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS — what appears to be a government-owned household (asset) associated with EMIC, which is in turn associated with Cambridge Analytica — to make it appear I was at that location. This occurred just after I found military IP addresses assigned to the Royal Military College of Canada connecting to my systems, along with the associated shell companies and the redeployment of that IP.
The military contracts associated with this house (asset) allowed for Target Audience Analysis (TAA), which is considered psychological warfare and weapons-grade communications tactics — deployed not only against me but against the Canadian public, and more specifically Nova Scotia, from 2020 to the present. They used "Howling Wolves," which mirrored my work at the time, adding to their goal of making it look like I was watching them, so as to justify their retaliation.
On August 2, 2022, I went to Halifax Regional Police Headquarters to file a complaint against Chief of Police Dan Kinsella. Instead, I was falsely arrested and subjected to physical and psychological torture, including a sexual assault while in the custody of the Nova Scotia Health Authority. Direct evidence, including audio recordings and detailed record reviews, shows that HRP and NSHA staff fabricated records and retaliated against me for reporting serious abuse.
The RCMP then leaned on those fabricated records and fabricated their own records to justify their retaliation. There are audio recordings and detailed reviews of records that clearly show the abuse. All records and reviews are provided below for independent verification, and can be accessed through the Detailed Index.
The detailed evidence includes evidence of IMSI catchers; massive property spikes correlating with engagement by government and media; companies associated with the case reporting their phone systems hacked; and Valent Legal being hacked and targeting me the day I was falsely arrested and tortured, using links that looked like they were from the Government of Canada.
Before I was arrested on August 2, 2022, I released The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA on July 11, 2022 — 400+ data points, largely hyperlinked, outlining connections between these events. Instead of taking my complaint, HRP stated they were getting me paperwork to file a complaint, then came back and arrested me. Within three months, HRP would hold a historic vote of no confidence against that same Chief — with 84% of members voting and 96.6% voting no confidence — while there are direct connections to the FBI, along with connections to Postmedia, Torstar, and J.D. Irving. Durign this vote, the EMIC Cotracts were deleted from the Government of Canada Website and onyl added back after i stated it in email thread that theye xisted in waybackmachine and are legally admissable in court.
To defend against the continued attacks from the RCMP, HRP, and NSHA, www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com was launched June 30, 2023.
The review bridges Bill C-18 (the Online News Act) with the Mueller Report, Cambridge Analytica (EMIC), Postmedia, Torstar, and Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, through the Russian war with Ukraine. It also tracks David Pugliese — a journalist with the Ottawa Citizen and National Post (Postmedia) — years before he was accused of being a Russian spy in October 2024. His posting pattern shows serious statistical evidence that he began a directed attack toward Irving in 2018, correlating with Bill C-18 and the special interests associated with Postmedia and their American handlers at the time.
It further details how certain actors appear to have attempted to take over and threaten Canadian media with the direct intention of harming Canada, which is also related to the events involving David Pugliese.
This case will cover police retaliation and abuse and associations with the drug trade in Nova Scotia; sexual assault and the cover-up perpetrated by multiple RCMP officers; the direct fabrication of records by multiple institutions; and retaliation by the OIPC, the Government of Nova Scotia, CSIS, the RCMP, J.D. Irving, CPSNS, and the CRCC for reporting these events, defending myself, and simply asking for an investigation.
In relation to this case, there have been several high-profile resignations that correlate with key disclosures within TWNN: Stephen McNeil (August 6, 2020), Kevin McCoy, Kevin Mooney (June 23, 2022), Jamie Irving, Dan Kinsella (September 6, 2023), Jamie Irving (David Vigneault (July 4, 2024), and Justin Trudeau (January 6, 2025).
CSIS has formally accepted the case under reference Attachment5566 (February 21, 2025). The RCMP has been formally asked to investigate under file 2025-21595; however, they have retaliated several times, directly covering up the sexual assault and abuse. Elections Canada has been notified but has not responded.
- 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS – Connecting Spyware and Multiple DND operations
- CPSNS (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia) / NSHA (Nova Scotia Health Authority)
- RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
- HRP Professional Standards / HRP (Halifax Regional Police)
- CRCC (The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP)
- OIPC (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia)
- OPC / ESDC — The Privacy Regulator That Closed the File Before the Call, Files PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, and P-2025-00180
- Cox & Palmer, Stephen McNeil, and Irving Shipbuilding — The CPSNS/NSHA Privacy Breach, the Unassessed Conflict of Interest, and the Escalation Record
- McInnes Cooper and David Fraser — The Conflict of Interest, the Spyware Testimony, and the Simmonds Connection
- Postmedia, the Mueller Report, and the Consolidation of Canadian Media — Summary
- Target Audience Analysis (TAA) 1% Events
- Individuals:
- David Pecker, Dylan Howard, Daniel Rotstein, Donald Trump and Jamie Irving
9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS – Connecting Spyware and Multiple DND operations
Postmedia, Mark Norman, the Mueller Report and the May 2019 Convergence – Connecting with EMIC
Following Chatham Asset Management's acquisition of approximately 65% of Postmedia's variable voting shares on October 6, 2016, a series of independently documented events occurred involving Postmedia, the National Enquirer, Vice Admiral Mark Norman, and later developments arising from the Mueller investigation.
Approximately two weeks after Chatham's acquisition, David Pecker, Chairman and CEO of American Media Inc. (AMI), joined the Postmedia Board of Directors. Through Chatham's ownership position, this placed the publisher of the National Enquirer within the governance structure of Canada's largest newspaper chain. Pecker would later be identified throughout the Mueller investigation in relation to documented "catch-and-kill" practices used during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
On January 16, 2017, Vice Admiral Mark Norman was temporarily relieved of his duties as Vice Chief of the Defence Staff. His suspension ultimately resulted in a lengthy RCMP investigation and criminal prosecution that attracted significant national media attention, including extensive reporting by Ottawa Citizen defence journalist David Pugliese, a Postmedia journalist.
Meanwhile, scrutiny surrounding Postmedia itself continued. On November 22, 2018, the Competition Bureau obtained court orders requiring senior executives from Postmedia and Torstar to appear for examination regarding the 2017 newspaper asset swap. The orders required examinations within 120 days.
Exactly 120 days later, on March 22, 2019, the Ontario Superior Court extended that deadline. The same day, Special Counsel Robert Mueller submitted the Mueller Report to the U.S. Attorney General. The report specifically references David Pecker and Dylan Howard in connection with AMI's "catch-and-kill" practices and campaign-related coordination. Because Pecker simultaneously served on Postmedia's Board of Directors following Chatham's acquisition, these events form a documented chronological overlap between Canadian and American media developments.
A second convergence occurred in May 2019. On May 8, 2019, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada stayed the criminal charges against Mark Norman, effectively ending the prosecution. On that same day, U.S. President Donald Trump asserted executive privilege over portions of the Mueller Report, restricting disclosure of underlying materials to Congress.
One week later, on May 15, 2019, Trump granted a full pardon to Conrad Black, founder of the National Post and a central figure in the historical lineage of the Postmedia network. The proximity of these events—the end of the Mark Norman prosecution, executive privilege over the Mueller materials, and Conrad Black's pardon—occurred within a seven-day period.
This chronology is presented because it forms part of the broader sequence surrounding the October 2016 changes in Postmedia ownership and governance. The dates are documented as temporal relationships within the historical record. No direct causal relationship between these events is asserted. Rather, they establish the sequence in which these independently verifiable political, legal, military, and media developments occurred before the July 2019 events discussed elsewhere in this record.
EMIC, Cambridge Analytica, SCL Group, Government of Canada and J.D Irving.
EMIC (Emic Consulting) is directly linked to SCL Group — the parent company of Cambridge Analytica — through its director, Gaby van den Berg, who previously worked for SCL Group, and through its use of SCL's Behavioural Dynamics Methodology. Cambridge Analytica was involved in a massive scandal that broke in March 2018, in which employees used vast amounts of citizens' information, combined with machine learning, to specifically change the outcomes of elections. The fallout from these events led to billions of dollars in fines for Facebook — including a $5 billion FTC penalty in July 2019 — and ongoing court battles in Canada as of July 6, 2026.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica
The core issue with J.D. Irving started during my employment period, February 4, 2019 until July 26, 2019. During an investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I found my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, Nova Scotia. In July 4, 2022, I correlated the EMIC contracts with this address.
- Use www.viewpoint.ca (create a free account) to check the land registry records for 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater; they will show the events for July 5, 2019, but also that the address was owned by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
- Check the Government of Canada proactive disclosure portal, which shows the start date of the EMIC contract with the Government of Canada as July 5, 2019 — Emic Consulting Ltd., $615,285.00, work description "Conduct of Training," additional comments "Target Audience Analysis, Ottawa, ON," Organization: National Defence:
- https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/?search_text=EMIC
- A second contract followed on September 15, 2020, for $653,462.05 — which correlates directly with mail that went missing from my mailbox.
Infographic showing associations with 9330 to EMIC Contracts: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2019-07-05_EMIC%20%20%20%20%20AMI%20%20%20%20%20Postmedia%20showing%20matching%20October%202016%20dates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bde6y2mc)
You will note that it was not disclosed until October 13, 2020 — by David Pugliese of the Ottawa Citizen — that EMIC had been contracted by the Government of Canada and that its behaviour-modification training was still in active use. I could not have known any of this at the time.
During this investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I also uncovered phishing emails sent from an IP address (216.208.235.222) directly owned by the Royal Military College of Canada. They were received December 4, 2018 — just before the job interview at Irving Shipbuilding between myself, the manager, and the Director. Upon investigation in late 2019, the evidence indicated with a high degree of certainty that they were associated with shell companies used by intelligence agencies, while the IP address was also redeployed to a new geographic location. The server wasn't dead and allowed me to connect through a web browser. These connections would have set off flags inside their systems.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-05-28_Military_IP_Marie_Sommer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/nnba9btk)
The original email headers can be found here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2018-12-04_Marie_Sommer_Email_Headers_RMC_IP_216.208.235.222_Irving_Shipbuilding_Pre_Interview.html (https://tinyurl.com/yxrducds)
This information was provided directly to CSIS within TWNN ALPHA, and again on August 2, 2022 — before the false arrest by HRP and the subsequent sexual assault and torture.
This IP information was given to investigator Jim Perrin — former Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit with Halifax Regional Police — along with the third-party HR investigator hired to investigate, Jodi Posavad of Grassroots Consulting.
https://www.grassrootshrconsulting.ca/
You will see that a Security Review conducted on Jim Perrin was submitted on January 20, 2020, in which Jim Perrin failed his review:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-20_Security_Review_Jim_Perrin_Irving_Shipbuilding.html (https://tinyurl.com/nhcfd9ww)
We would have a recorded meeting on January 27, 2020 at Irving Shipbuilding; both Jim Perrin and Jodi Posavad failed the meeting catastrophically. By January 31, 2020, I had submitted a detailed security and technical review of Jodi Posavad — she failed horribly, while I provided suggested solutions to each problem found. This is also where I provided the military IP addresses. A copy of the review:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-31_Jodi_Posavad_Privacy_and_Security_Review_RMC_IP_Shell_Companies.html (https://tinyurl.com/y5ddjvbe)
After providing this, Jim Perrin stated I was no longer allowed to speak with Jodi Posavad, while he did not follow up as he had advised he would. In fact, during the investigation, I advised that they had used job terms from my work in their job postings; these then got changed. On February 14, 2020, I emailed director Jordan Jacobowski, advising him of this, asking him to confirm the information in the postings was now being deleted, and asking why Jim Perrin had not followed up as he had stated he would. In that email, I wrote to him directly:
"Hey XXXXX, I need you to do me a huge favor — as soon as possible and without question. This will help build trust between us."
The postings in question, identified by posting number and timestamp, are:
- June 8, 2019 at 4:45 PM — posting #30461078
- June 15, 2019 at 6:45 AM — posting #30521702
- July 15, 2019 at 5:02 PM — posting #30797801
At this stage, not only had they dismissed the reported racism and harassment as some narrative invented to get them — they had now been dominated in their own recordings, caught changing evidence, alongside the military IP addresses used for phishing. There was also a long history of abuse involving this manager, while there were rumours going around that Irving Shipbuilding was hiring people specifically to blame. By setting my phone's GPS location to that address, it would make it look like I was spying on these parties, while allowing them to justify further spying to dig for something to use against me — they could just present the data to a judge, who would never question it.
Now, if you check the registered owner and their social media, they have pictures where they are at Irving Shipbuilding. They also have signed certificates from Justin Trudeau (former Liberal Party Leader and Prime Minister). During my employment, someone randomly came up to me on the street and said, "I think you know Laurie Jewers." I stated that I didn't. They said, "I think you do." The top friend on the address owner's Facebook is Laurie Jewers.
This is a slight digression but important but i believe is important Now, a small bit of informaiton that potentially connects Dylan Howard, who was connected to Postmedia, David Peckwr and Daniel Rotstein, which you cal also directly associate to this same property in 2016 arises. AMI, on March 31, 2020 chose to not renew their contract, the next day, April 1, 2020 is when the Wikispooks article regarding Gaby Van Den Berg, Director of EMIC gets created:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2020-04-01%20-%20Date%20Wikispooks%20article%20was%20published%20on%20Gaby%20Van%20Den%20Berg.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bdvmrd2f)
Shortly after the newspaper events i would meet a person which would then lead to what appears to be an extortion attempt aimed at me for $50,000 dollars. It involved them allegedly writing a book and using some stories about my life while they tried to get me t do what appeared to “drugs”, with a laptop camera pointed at me. They also made different references to the “royals”, and how they had interacted with them. If you check Dylan Howard, In August 2019 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_Howard Howard signed an exclusive deal to publish his true crime titles with Skyhorse and Start Publishing. Published 8 books starting December 3, 2019 through October 5, 2020. One book was “Diana: Case Solved (17 September 2019)” and the other “Royals at War (30 June 2020)”, its the only book he duplicated the topics while Royals At War would coincide with meeting with this person. While Dylan Howard had also Allegedly been involved with events involving Spyware going back to Harvey Weinstein.
Now, on June 10, 2020 — after the events with George Floyd on May 25, 2020 — I went out to protest racism locally. Everyone will tell you how respectful and kind I was; I never bothered anyone. I was there to hear all sides and make sure the community was having a discussion, good or bad. I live in Ecum Secum, Nova Scotia, which is 40+ km from an RCMP station or gas station. It is a remote area, yet two RCMP vehicles showed up, stalking me up and down the road. Multiple locals witnessed the events and were extremely concerned about the behaviour. One parked at the top of the hill pointing down, while the other kept driving back and forth:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-10_Police%20Stalking%20June%2010th%202020.JPG%20 (https://tinyurl.com/3t289xf9)
A journalist then showed up and asked if she could do a story. I was hesitant, but family convinced me to do it. She asked if she could take a picture of me, my dog, and my signs. I agreed. On June 17, 2020, the Guysborough Journal released the article — front page, which I didn't know was going to happen. However, on that same day, records indicate my internet was hard cut and required a technician to come work on the lines.
Page 1: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Front%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/rycaz93u)
Page 2: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_%20Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Second%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yh72dy8x)
In the images on the front page of the Guysborough Journal, you will see me holding signs, with my dog — but in the background you will see a Department of Transportation (DOT) truck. The owner of 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS holds a position at DOT as an Equipment Operator. Eventually, as journalists made FOI requests regarding EMIC and Howling Wolves, they found DND had targeted Black Lives Matter protesters — and you will see me holding a sign stating "Black Lives Matter" — while they then tried to blame Howling Wolves on Russian disinformation. Soon after disclosure of this by David Pugliese, he would be accused before Parliament of being a Russian asset/spy. This will be covered more in detail later on:
By August 5, 2020, I would send a dominating email — inside of it, I would howl — asking the Defence Minister to directly take action. Direct parts of the email were addressed to Jordan, Jodi, Jim, Irving, CSIS, DND, and Harjit Sajjan (then Defence Minister), speaking to systemic racism and abuse. The next day, then-Premier of Nova Scotia Stephen McNeil suddenly announced his resignation. As part of the escalation process, I had requested this investigation be escalated to government.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/2020-08-05_August%205th%202020%20Letter%20Before%20Stephen%20McNeil%20Resigned.docx (https://tinyurl.com/4w9f4utw)
But this doesn't end here. You see, at this same time, DND and the military were involved in the Howling Wolves training exercises in Nova Scotia — consistent with my work during the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding. Multiple news organizations ran stories on it, including American and global news agencies. You will see the Wolf Letter was dated August 3, 2020 — just two days before I would release my letter — while my letter had been ready by July 27, 2020, and we can confirm they were into my systems because of the phone's GPS location being set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS. The Wolf Letter from the military also uses the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) letterhead; the 9330 address was owned by DNR and is just a few buildings down the road from the DNR office, while — again — its land registration events match the first EMIC contract.
Shortly after, mail from ESDC regarding a jurisprudence decision involving the OPC and PIPEDA in relation to Irving Shipbuilding went missing from my mailbox. The letter is dated September 15, 2020; the second EMIC contract started September 15, 2020.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)
Harjit Sajjan, Jody Thomas, and General Jonathan Vance all signed off on the EMIC contracts. At the same time, the Liberal Government was facing the WE Charity scandal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WE_Charity_scandal
If the connections with these police officers, and then EMIC, had come out, it could have brought down the Liberal Government — which shows why they would sacrifice a player like Stephen McNeil.
As requested in my submissions, I gave them six months to correct the behaviour. Six months later, Kevin McCoy — then President and CEO — stepped down.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/added_2025_02/2021-02-05_Kevin%20McCoy%20President%20of%20Irving%20Shipbuilding%20Stepped%20Down%20Kevin%20Mooney%20would%20take%20over%201%20day%20before%20Stephen%20Mcneil%20leaves%20office.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/f8uphjwj)
The next day, Stephen McNeil formally left office while Jodi Posavad implemented the security changes requested:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_McNeil
You will see that the land transfers for the property — which you can see from my house — match the missing mail and the second EMIC contract date of September 15, 2020, and that the other set of events matches the date McCoy and McNeil officially left office. Just before this, when setting up a cell repeater, I got hits from a possible IMSI catcher behind my house and my neighbours'. The night after my false arrest on August 2, 2022, my neighbour would find two RCMP officers sneaking around behind their house at night with flashlights. This will be covered in detail in another section.
In this case, i had requested access to the Audio recording under PIPEDA, and had an ongoing case with OPC and ESDC. This is the mail that went missing from my mailbox. DND, CSIS and Jdiffving had no way of knwing this response, and had ESDC sided with me then i would have had a copy of the audio recording where they were Caught mockign thes etopics, wher ei dominated them, where they were told job terms they later deleted from postings, where i asked for privacy policy and they decilned, where Jim perrin tried to get me to say i was an engineer and Jodi had to stop him while they would be accoutnbale for any and all mischaraterization of me.
Now, eventually the story about the howling wolves made its way around he world and different newspapers did stories on it. Surprisingly, CTV does not seem to have done a story on it however, Global and CBC did, as well as Vice. This would lead, CBC’s Brett Ruskin to make FOI request for the data, they would respond with over 1,000 pages.
I would send Emma riant a Linked In Message March 4, 2024 as king for assitance with the Howling wolf events and EMIC in Nova Scotia: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2024-03-04_LinkedIn_Message_To_Emma_Briant_About_EMIC_No_Response.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/56yx5t9t)
Eventually, David Pugliese, woudl also end up getting copies of similar informaiton and on October 2, 2024 David Puliese would release an article about the details, but also stating Emma Briant was taking DND to court of the Howling Wolves event in Nova Scotia: Inside this article, you will see that the same parties targeted Black Lives Matters protesters. In the New Paper article, you will see me holding a sign that says Black Lives Matter while in the background is a DOT truck and the owner of 9330 Highway #7 has a desk and phone number with Department of Transportation. One of the record obtained also showed how links between Canadian Public Affairs and U.S propaganda expert who tried to push the claim that Russians were behind the wolf letter, which is an outstanding contradiction because the Canadian Military themselves took responsibility. Within 22 days, Chris Alexander would go into Parliament and accuse David Pugliese of being a Russian Asset, and provided documents allegedly found in a Ukrainian Archive.
September 7, 2023, the Day afetr Dan Kinsella announced his retirement (September 6, 2023), the Government of Canada Announced its inquiriy into Foreign Interferrence:
https://foreigninterferencecommission.ca/
While on remembered 27, 2024 i would submit a detailed submission to the foreign interference committee, covering these topics and laying out mutiple possibilities for the David Pugliese issue and discuss foreign interference as a whole and provide my examples, including GPS manipulation:
http://localhost/HTMLDocuments/2024-12-27_Foreign_Interference_Commission_Regarding_2019_And_2021_Federal_Elections.html (https://tinyurl.com/ycydnnuu)
Ranging form him being setup, to being a government asset or possibly aware. But also stated how perfect the move was, because it allowed CSIS to claim they did some kind of investigation, the move was almost too perfect, to clean. And if the evidence was then found to be fabricated, then they could say he was being framed, and state that’s also what occurred in 2018, 2019. This gets all parties, including him out of what occurred while they can claim some kind of investigation was done. Its too perfect.
And so unsurprisingly, By October 3, 2025 it would come out that the documents appeared to be fabricated.
https://thewalrus.ca/a-veteran-reporter-was-branded-as-a-russian-spy-the-proof-didnt-hold-up/
All which can make it look like he was framed and all parties did some kind of investigation, so they wouldn’t have to answer for all the evidence found in TWNN. While if you look at the bottom of the article by David Pugliese regarding Emma Briant on October 2, 2024 it states:
“ Godin wrote that Eyre wanted to “discuss how the wolf letter issue could be removed from being conflated with” the $1-million training course on influence techniques that Briant had revealed as well as previous articles on military pandemic propaganda plans. “
Framing Pugliese ensures all parties, including David Pugliese get out of it, and its never investigated. Yet the EMIC Contracts line dup with 9330 Highway #7 Stillater NS, howling wolves motif in my work, and the property was previously owned by DNR which was the letter head used in the Howling wolves campaign. Even with all this evidence that would support Pugliese articles, he has never contacted me while Any rational or decent journalists would see this data and understand how serious it is.
By Putting my phones GPS location to this household and associating it with Russians. Would have allowed these parties to target me with every single one of their advanced systems looking for dirt they could use against me.
Backstory to 9330 Highway # 7 Stillwater NS, EMIC and Its associations with Postmedia.
After ym false arrest and torture, HRP would hold a historic, never before done vote of confidence in their Chief Dan Kinsella. 84% of members voted, 96.6% vted no confidence. During this period, the EMIC Contracts went missing from the Government website. This was reported on Main Email thread to RCMP and dozens of parties. The EMIC contracts match his start date as Cheif of Police. <LINK> while he has direct connections with FBI, and many people wonder why he came from Ontario, and why they didn’t choose someone local to replace Blaise.
Infographic showing contracts were removed from the Government site, and this was reported to dozens of Parties including RCMP: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-2_Proof%20EMIC%20contracted%20existed%20August%2029th%202022%20and%20Sepotember%2015th%20but%20as%20of%20October%2026th%202022%20they%20cant%20be%20found.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24y5d68m)
You can see the HRP Section for more details, including how Stephen McNeil is directly connected to HRP through his family ties — most notably his brother, Robin McNeil, who was acting chief during the period my wallet was stolen — and how the transfer of Jim Perrin from HRP to Irving was likely arranged after the release of the Wortley Report. It also details how this ties into Dan Kinsella.
To strengthen the connections with the Military Contracts and Retaliation, see the TAA 1% Events section to overlay additional events.
Given that, Irving Shipbulding got dominated int he investigation, and considerable abuse reported also by third parties such as stalkign children these parties knew they wer ein alot of trouble. They had my IP connecting to thier IP address, its reaosnable thes eparties et my phiens GPS locaiton to that household as to make it look like i was spying on them. This would allow them to justify furtehr retaliation. They then negaged in Psychological warfare from that ajddress invovling Howling Wolves.
CPSNS (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia) / NSHA (Nova Scotia Health Authority)
NSHA / CPSNS — The Fabricated Records, the Uninvestigated Sexual Assault, and the Regulator That Protected Them
On August 2, 2022, Halifax Regional Police arrested me at the moment I attempted to file a complaint against their Chief and delivered me, in handcuffs, to the QEII Emergency Department of the Nova Scotia Health Authority. Everything that followed occurred under NSHA care, and everything that followed is documented — in audio recordings, contemporaneous emails, and NSHA's own internal records — in my formal complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia dated March 27, 2026, requesting independent investigation of both the physicians involved and the College itself:
Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-27_CPSNS_Formal_Complaint_and_Request_for_Independent_Investigation.html (https://tinyurl.com/4jys92vj)
While in continuous custody, I was kept awake for approximately 24 hours, held in handcuffs for roughly eleven of them, denied access to a lawyer on five separate occasions — "Honey, there is no phone" — and compelled to discuss the very allegations involving the officers present, under the explicit threat that refusal meant involuntary admission. My bookbag — containing my wallet, driver's licence, health card, banking information, and cash — was transferred to Mount Hope before I had even seen a doctor, transported with another patient who was self-admittedly under the influence and who told me the next morning that officers had gone through my wallet. Mount Hope's own internal note, dated August 3, 2022, confirms it: "The client's belongings including wallet was brought to the unit with the previous client mistakenly." That is a reportable Personal Health Information breach under NSHA's own policy, signed by its own Provincial Director of Privacy, Karen Hornberger. It was never reported. It was never investigated. That same morning, August 3, 2022, I reported in writing — to a distribution list of approximately 118 recipients — that I had woken to a man standing over me. I repored to kristen Holm that iw as touched and told “they knoew they arent supposed to touch you” and so it didnt happen. The reported sexual assault has never been investigated by any institution at any level but has been reported to NSHA, CPSNS and RCMP.
The records produced to justify all of this do not survive contact with the evidence. Nancy Murphy, the admitting Emergency physician, recorded that I lived with my parents — I co-owned a home with my severely disabled mother, whom I cared for — recorded claims I never made, recorded nothing about The Wolf and the Neural Network, nothing about HRP declaring themselves a conflict of interest, and later admitted to the College in writing: "on review, I find Mr. Jewers' particular chart is incomplete." The record states I was found "protesting" outside Halifax Regional Police — a characterization that appears nowhere in HRP's own report, was never said by me, and was never corrected by anyone. While there is absolutely no record from any HRP officer about why i was brought in, and so no statement to hold them legally accountable.
The most serious fabrication belongs to Kristen Holm, psychiatrist at Mount Hope. Her written record states I "kept going back to connections between Bell Media, Irving, and Stephen Harper." The audio recording of August 5, 2022 proves the conversation was about Stephen McNeil and Postmedia — Holm says "McNeil" by name, on tape, at the thirteen-minute mark, while telling me my connections were delusions:
Audio, exact timestamp: https://youtu.be/9dGY_N9ni1w?si=1SJPE4w_8YvLiwoo&t=811
Two days earlier, on August 3, 2022, I had emailed 118 recipients: "i only talked about mcneil and postmedia." Neither Stephen Harper nor Bell Media were focused on in the 400+ data points of TWNN ALPHA, released July 11, 2022 and were hardly ever mentioned except in passing research details. This is not a transcription error. Stephen McNeil is the brother of Robin McNeil — former Acting Chief of HRP during the period my wallet was taken, and central to the conflict of interest I was arrested for trying to report. By substituting the names, the written record changed the subject matter of the conversation itself, which means every lawyer, regulator, and police force that later reviewed that record was investigating a different conversation than the one that occurred. Holm's own recorded words — "It wasn't about your behaviour, it was about what you were talking about" — confirm that the content of my speech was the basis of my detention. Then the record changed what I was talking about.
When I filed complaints, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia relied on those same records to dismiss them. Registrar and CEO Douglas Grant — trained in both law and medicine — stated there was "no evidence to suggest" my belongings were moved before my transfer, while the Mount Hope note stating exactly that sat in the materials he claimed to have reviewed in their entirety. While prior, i had supplied the page numbers of the informaiton to CPSNS 5 times and even called Crystal Morgan, lead Invetsigator to ask her if i could supply the section to OIPC. He acknowledged in writing that Murphy's charting was incomplete "particularly in cases where her medical-legal decisions, such as the need for involuntary treatment, may be challenged" — then dismissed the complaint on the basis of that same incomplete record. On January 15, 2024, CPSNS transmitted my personal and confidential information to Colin Clarke of Cox & Palmer — the firm where Stephen McNeil holds a senior position, and which has itself acknowledged a conflict of interest regarding J.D. Irving through its shipbuilding work. When the College asked on February 20, 2024 whether I wished to appeal, I responded the same day, repeatedly, stating the conflict had to be resolved before any appeal could proceed and that the disclosure violated Section 46 of the Medical Act. Suzanne Husbands replied: "I confirm you have not requested an appeal. These files are now closed." My recorded voicemails to Crystal Morgan on February 23 and February 29, 2024 and to Cindy Campbell on March 11, 2024 were never returned. On April 29, 2024, Douglas Grant disclosed additional information to Cox & Palmer — after the conflict had been explicitly raised:
Full record of the Husbands correspondence: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/February20th2024_CPSNS_Suzanne_Husbands_Retaliated.html (https://tinyurl.com/t77wfjhh)
The pattern repeated on March 13, 2023 — the day I filed my Form 5 complaint with HRP Professional Standards. Within hours, I was apprehended again under the IPTA. The QEII triage note claims I had been "sending vague threatening emails... with some threats to doctors" — while the same note records me as calm and cooperative, with good eye contact and good affect. No threat has ever been quoted, dated, or produced by NSHA, the RCMP, or any reviewing body, despite all correspondence existing in email. The note never identifies who initiated the Section 14 request; Corporal Jessica Welke told me directly that it originated from a director within NSHA.
During this apprehension, Hana Marie Weimer denied me a lawyer and refused to allow me to audio record — and did not document that I had asked. She told me that if I did not speak about the issue, I would simply be locked up. I advised her of my bias, that I was aiming for 70%, and of The Wolf and the Neural Network. I told her about the sexual assault, the relation, and my bookbag; about Tim Houston and the neighbours reporting lights in my house; and about the rape calls. Her response: "Obviously you are making this all up."
On August 1, 2023, I filed my complaint against Nancy Murphy with CPSNS. On August 31, 2023, a bailiff served me with a trespass notice from NSHA claiming I had been at their properties — I live 150 kilometres away, was nowhere near them, and the same person appears to have completed the entire form, including signing for the witness. The trespass notice was dated August 22, 2023.
Fifteen days after that notice was dated, on September 6, 2023, Dan Kinsella announced his retirement as Chief of Police. He left office September 15. If a resignation had been tendered internally on or around August 22, a two-week gap before the public announcement would be standard institutional practice — time to brief the Board of Police Commissioners, arrange an interim, and control the messaging. I am not asserting that occurred. I am noting that the dates are consistent with it: the same date appears on a fabricated trespass notice and, working backward from the announcement, on a plausible internal resignation. Readers can weigh the alignment themselves.
This is the closed loop, documented end to end: HRP's false arrest signalled to NSHA that I was not credible; NSHA's fabricated records signalled the same to the RCMP, the CRCC, and CPSNS; and each institution relied on the last institution's characterization rather than the underlying evidence, so that no one — across at least fifteen individuals in four institutions — ever examined what actually happened. The conditions themselves — prolonged sleep deprivation, deprivation of food and water, detention in handcuffs, a sexual boundary violation, and an assessment conducted and relied upon under those conditions — are set against the legal definition of torture under section 269.1 of the Criminal Code and the UN Convention Against Torture in the full complaint, and at minimum meet the threshold of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, incompatible with the evidentiary requirements of the IPTA and Section 7 of the Charter.
This matter has been delivered to Health Canada with a formal request for external investigation of the named physicians and of Douglas Grant's conduct as Registrar, to the RCMP with a request for criminal investigation, to the CRCC, to NSIRA, to CSIS under Attachment5566, and to media and political offices across Canada. The audio recordings exist. The internal notes exist. The emails are timestamped and were distributed to over a hundred recipients in real time. Every claim in this section can be checked against the record — which is precisely why the record had to be changed.
RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
When the CRCC asked me to submit individual complaints against the officers involved, I did — against fifteen of them, on their own rules. On May 25, 2025, CRCC Manager Paul instructed in writing that submissions be limited to six pages per officer; on February 24, 2026, he cited the Commission's authority under section 45.68 to merge complaints. Fifteen officers at six pages each allows ninety pages. The submission runs approximately forty-eight, with roughly twenty-seven minutes of video evidence per officer — well within the CRCC's own stated limits. Many of the evidence videos were recorded live while calling the voicemail of Shelly Mews of the RCMP Special Victims Unit, making the recordings part of the RCMP's own communication record. Shelly Mews never responded to a single one, while there is direct evidence she was deleting the voicemails — deleting evidence to cover up her own fabrications and retaliation in this matter.
The full submission, delivered March 16, 2026 to the CRCC, CSIS under Attachment5566, NSIRA, every provincial premier, federal party leaders, and newsrooms across Canada:
Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-16_CRCC%20Detailed%20submission%20regarding%20mutiple%20officers.html (https://tinyurl.com/yuafunmy)
The record establishes that none of this was unknown. When contacted, the RCMP stated in September 2021 that they were aware of and monitoring the complaint thread. When I emailed hundreds of recipients on October 26, 2022 and November 6, 2022 advising that the EMIC contracts were being removed from the federal government website, RCMP officers attended my residence because of those emails. The officers who attended, and the officers who reviewed the emails, acknowledged that nothing in them was threatening and that they raised a legitimate concern.
On July 27, 2023, I attended both the Sheet Harbour and Sherbrooke detachments in person, on camera, and submitted detailed evidence; neither detachment made a record or ever contacted me. On March 13, 2024, I stood across from the Sheet Harbour detachment with two signs — "How did my GPS get set to 9330 Stillwater NS" and "Sheet Harbour RCMP Framed and Terrorized Me and My Disabled Mother" — and members of the public stopped to tell me they had been framed by that detachment too. The failure to act was not the result of a lack of notice. It was a choice.
The officer sections follow one skeleton: a recorded interaction, a specific commitment, and the documented breach. Corporal Jessica Welke — commanding officer of Sheet Harbour, the supervisor of nearly every other officer named — is on the May 24, 2023 recording hearing me state "I have to officially press charges," hearing me report that I had been told that if I even mentioned J.D. Irving I would be arrested and pumped full of drugs — at which moment an unidentified voice in the background responds "GOOD" — and saying, verbatim, "I will call you Monday." Jessica Welke never called. Three days after I publicly flagged the recording, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team contacted me instead.
https://youtu.be/6bxtmFj8EVk
On February 12, 2023, after rape calls were reported, along with a vehicle then parked outside my elderly aunt's house, Constable Justin Hall asked me himself, at my aunt's residence, "Scott, you don't think this is related to that other stuff going on, do you?" — proof he could connect the pattern — and opened nothing. Prior to this, Constable Chad Sanford had stated openly that they were looking for a reason to charge me, and asked what it would take to end the matter. I told him: open a case, and have Commissioner Brenda Lucki's office contact me. Neither happened.
The rape calls were not anonymous noise. The caller's phone number was provided to the RCMP, and it belongs to the same individual alleged in an earlier reported incident to have killed a dog. The vehicle recorded on video outside my elderly aunt's house appears to belong to a member of the same family. Part of the abuse reported to the RCMP also included a photograph of an RCMP vest found at a suspected drug pickup location, alongside statements made to me directly by community members — repeated openly across this community for years — that the local RCMP has been bought off. I make no assertion about any private individual's guilt; that is what investigations are for. What the record documents is that a named suspect, a phone number, video evidence, and a photographed vest were all placed in the RCMP's hands, and produced no case, no record, and no follow-up of any kind — while what followed instead, on tape, was Sheet Harbour members threatening me and fabricating records. Whether that pattern reflects the long-documented practice of police tolerating compromised parties in exchange for looking away, readers can weigh for themselves. What is documented is the inputs the RCMP received, and the absence of any output.
Sergeant Stevens — assigned by the CRCC itself — appears on three recordings: September 27, December 12, and December 13, 2023. On the September 27 call, he defines his mandate in his own words: "My role is to investigate wrongdoing by RCMP when it comes to you." On December 12, he confirms he received and reviewed the CRCC submissions and video links, writes down the central question — how my GPS location was set to 9330 Highway 7, Stillwater, NS — and acknowledges the core allegation on tape: "you tried to open the case and... you were denied that... it's something that I would look into." He records my requested resolution, including the resignations requested, and closes with a commitment: "somebody will be in touch with you." Nobody ever was. Given the documented threats and the arrest that followed my last attempt to sit down with officers, I declined to provide a statement in a room at a detachment; Stevens accepted that on the recording and stated he would "paint the full picture" for the decision-makers regardless.
On December 13, I asked him directly: as a citizen reporting threats against children, the targeting of a disabled woman, planted GPS data, and police stalking — if he doesn't investigate these, who do I take them to? His answer, twice on the same call, was: the police — the police of jurisdiction, with the caveat that no single police service would deal with all of it. That is the circularity documented throughout this record: the misconduct being reported is the police refusing to take the report. Also on that recording, I recount the Welke house visit — her berating me until the accompanying officer put his hand on her shoulder and told her to stop, and her response upon hearing the GPS evidence: "maybe you're not supposed to know." Stevens confirms on the same call that he had read the CRCC submissions, including the account of the night my mother died — meaning none of it can later be claimed as unknown to the investigation.
Transcripts of Calls with Sgt Stevens:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-09-27_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/2w6ks989)
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-12-12_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/4pmrav5t)
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-12-13_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/5drau9jd)
Corporal Attewell attended my home on August 22, 2024 over a Facebook post about Jessica Welke and laughed at the sexual assault and other abuse reported. On the September 13, 2024 recordings he confirms the post — not the assault — was the reason for his visit, and guarantees that "the Civilian Review Board... would have created a report every time someone calls." The CRCC's own documented conduct — Carole, David, and Paul, across three years — proves that guarantee false. When pressed again on the sexual assault, he states, "Well, I'm pretty confident in our members' abilities to investigate things, but I'll have a look" — and never does. There was no case and he knew this, but the statement shows his explicit trust in RCMP members, and his explicit presumption against me, the victim. He later claimed he tried to call me back; he did not — I have the phone records. He then claimed I did pick up when he called. I live in Ecum Secum, where there is effectively no cellular service, a fact known to every officer who has attended my residence, including him.
At this stage, you will also see calls with the CRCC where they state "Carole wouldn't do that," and where David himself did not record the sexual assault and abuse. Instead, they stated they had requested that their Complaints Directorate have Trevor Allen contact me. The CRCC knows he never did — a clear pattern of abuse by the RCMP. When I escalated the matter showing this had occurred, the CRCC knew they had a serious issue on their hands and branched the case to hide their misconduct and blame the complainant. This abusive process would then be exploited by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen on June 1, 2025.
On February 14 and February 21, 2025, after I called dispatch requesting a case number for a violent sexual assault — and stated on that call my concern that police retaliation might follow — Constables Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, and Zachary Lechene arrived at my door with the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team as a buffer instead of a case number. On the recording, Pye asks "Who are your abusers?" — after years of documented contact with her own detachment — and characterizes me as uncooperative seconds after being told I had given statements to fourteen officers across this record and posted every piece of evidence publicly. Lechene, asked directly whether officers would be standing at my door at all if a case number had simply been issued, answers: "Not sure." Both visits ended with the officers observed in their vehicles discussing how the incident would be recorded. No case was opened. The sexual assault was not documented.
Inspector Cory Bushell and Sergeant Trevor Allen later named Stevens a conflict of interest in their own report — and then relied on his record as though the conflict changed nothing.
On February 27, 2025, Shelly Mews of the Special Victims Unit contacted me under case 2025-21595, contact 902-220-2013. She attempted to arrange that I sit in a room with Attewell — the officer whose conduct I was reporting — in Musquodoboit Harbour, and took on the same tone about contacting me. It was clear she was leaning on his fabricated records, along with the Sheet Harbour detachment's. Given this involved multiple officers covering up sexual abuse and retaliation, I made it clear I wanted the case escalated to Commissioners Mike Duheme and Dennis Daley, as I explicitly and repeatedly requested. I left a voicemail requesting someone contact me to verify Shelly Mews was in fact an RCMP officer and that a case was in fact actually open. I would be contacted by someone named Curt Wallace, who left three voicemails in the same day while I was away. They made no mention of Shelly Mews, never listed a case number, and provided no contact information. Here are recordings of his voicemails:
https://youtu.be/ENnW9Z-K1rw
Effectively, nothing allowing you to identify them as any police member, or to contact them back — consistent with RCMP behaviour of falsely claiming they weren't contacted back. I immediately called Shelly Mews and left voice messages; nothing was returned. Later, when contacted by Cpl. Joseph Fraser (RCMP) on June 1, 2026, he would advise: "Sgt Curt Wallace is with HRP and thus, I cannot investigation his conduct" [sic].
Shelly Mews created a fork. She knew Wallace could not be investigated by the RCMP and would cause serious confusion — confusion the RCMP would blame me for — which is reasonably why Curt Wallace never left contact information. This is how officers fabricate false records and abuse the process, and it is consistent with Attewell's false claims about trying to contact me, which Shelly Mews tried to rely on.
From that period onward, I did my season videos while calling Shelly Mews. In one instance her voicemail box filled with my recorded evidence, and was then cleared — received, and deleted:
https://youtu.be/GurTUG-7eoU
Without the audio recordings, the record would suggest I was unresponsive, while she could claim the messages were too long, too short, or whatever fit a narrative of Shelly Mews simply being a victim. As of June 10, 2026 — approximately 454 days — nobody has contacted me regarding 2025-21595. My aunt contacted the RCMP/HRP out of concern; they then contacted me and left a voicemail advising they were still waiting for a statement from me and that the case was still assigned to Shelly Mews. So if Shelly Mews had a problem with me, why not reassign the case? Why not sincerely try to contact me? It is reasonable to conclude she knew about her misconduct, and keeping the case allows her to bias whichever officer it eventually gets assigned to.
That is precisely how this pattern operates. And after more than 800 days, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen opened the investigation on June 1, 2025 and closed it on June 4, 2025 — four days, no contact with me, no written statement from any officer, including Welke. They fabricated an entire record, never recorded the website or the evidence submitted, and never once referenced the sexual assault — yet it is listed directly in CRCC correspondence to the RCMP, very clearly, on September 6, 2023, was told to Carole directly, was known to the multiple RCMP members who attended my house regarding the sexual assault, and was reported to NSHA and CPSNS from the start in all complaints — reported within 12 hours of it occurring on August 2, 2022, on an email thread to dozens of media outlets, lawyers, government officials, and the RCMP and HRP directly. They acknowledged that their response was well outside their mandated timeline, fabricated records that make no sense, and just closed the case. This is after the CRCC themselves explicitly stated they had requested their Complaints Directorate have Trevor Allen contact me.
Set the input record against the output record. Stevens is on tape receiving the GPS question, acknowledging the denied-case allegation — "you tried to open the case and... you were denied that... it's something that I would look into" — recording the requested resolutions, and committing to "paint the full picture" up the chain. The four-day closure contains none of it: no GPS question, no denied-case finding, no sexual assault, no contact with the complainant. Between what Stevens is recorded receiving and what Bushell and Allen produced, the information vanished at one of exactly three points — Stevens's write-up, Bushell and Allen's review, or the CRCC's handling of the file. All three belong to them. The recordings mean the disappearance is not a matter of my word; it is a measurable gap between a documented input and a documented output.
A detailed rebuttal was submitted to the CRCC on July 9, 2025:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html (https://tinyurl.com/uawbhwr8)
Video Review of the Document:
Detailed evidence was then submitted to the CRCC, along with a review request for 2023-1031. Information was provided to the CRCC for 2024-005807. Paul, the Manager, did not respond until February 10, 2026 — two days before the CRCC Review's 120-business-day service standard would have been exceeded for 2023-1031. At this stage, the CRCC was in a lot of trouble for allowing this to occur. Obviously, the CRCC had made serious mistakes with 2023-1031, and the RCMP exploited those mistakes. The CRCC branched to 2024-005807 to try to cover this up and obscure the issue — because if 2024-005807 then showed critical issues with 2023-1031, it would show definitively that the CRCC caused serious problems, consistent with my submissions. So Paul and the CRCC waited until they knew they could use 2023-1031 to retaliate and claim the CRCC had done some kind of review — which is why the response came two days before the service standard expired. In total, it was about nine months, or 276 days, without a response: clearly excessive. Paul then reprimanded me for asking for updates, even though he knew a violent sexual assault had been reported repeatedly, and that the RCMP officers — whom the CRCC themselves had requested the Complaints Directorate have contact me — never did, and fabricated a false report. He and the CRCC knew they could use the fabricated record to retaliate; if not, they would have to admit fault for what they did. And so Paul used that opportunity to fabricate an internal record in which the CRCC were somehow the victims of receiving detailed evidence, to justify their inaction.
Detailed submissions were then made to the CRCC, along with requests to add the additional officers.
In my submission to the CRCC, you will see that complaints were lodged against fifteen different officers: Jessica Welke, Justin Hall, Chad Sanford, Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, Zachary Lechene, Sergeant Stevens, Corporal Attewell, Shelly Mews, Curt Wallace, Cory Bushell, Trevor Allen, Mike Duheme, Dennis Daley, and Brenda Lucki.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-16_CRCC%20Detailed%20submission%20regarding%20mutiple%20officers.html (https://tinyurl.com/yuafunmy)
On June 1, 2026, I was contacted by Cpl. Joseph Fraser, who requested details regarding the officers. However, in his response to me, he listed only the following: Cst. Matthews, Sgt. Attewell, Insp. Bushell, Ret. Sgt. Allen, Sgt. Stevens, Sgt. Mews, Cpl. Hall, Cpl. Sanford, and Cpl. Welke. The list omits Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, and Zachary Lechene entirely, while also omitting their senior commanders: Mike Duheme, Dennis Daley, and Brenda Lucki.
The CRCC removed the officers for whom there are direct audio recordings of them discussing the sexual assault and using Jessica Welke's name directly. These officers were requested to investigate the sexual assault and abuse, knew Jessica Welke was being accused of covering it up, and never opened cases themselves. Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen confirmed this: in their reports, they only looked at open cases with the Sheet Harbour detachment and never mentioned the sexual assault — yet those officers are on video recording directly speaking about it and retaliating. Those officers were also aware of the person saying "GOOD" when the abuse was reported — reasonably one of those officers themselves.
While they also removed Mike Duheme and Dennis Daley, while they have delivery confirmations of emails delivered to their addresses, as well as assistants that were not responded to, inline with the reported behaviour.
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2026-03-23_Delivery%20confirmation%20from%20Dennis%20Daley%20states%20he%20is%20retiring.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yvpjdkfk)
Meanwhile, the list includes "Cst. Matthews" — with an assigned allegation of "Improper Arrest." Neither exists in my complaint. The full submission is public and searchable: the name Matthews appears nowhere in it, and it contains no allegation of improper arrest against any RCMP member — the false arrest documented in this record is attributed to HRP. A misread name cannot generate a matching allegation. This entry therefore did not originate from my intake: it originated either from invention or from another complainant's file — and either origin is the CRCC's to explain. It also directly contradicts Fraser's own written answer that the determinations were made "based on your intakes." As of this writing, no explanation has been offered. Verify it yourself: the submission is linked above — search it for "Matthews."
A detailed response was then sent to Cpl. Joseph Fraser on June 30, 2026, asking about the discrepancies, along with the basic questions listed below.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-06-30_RCMP_CRCC_Joseph_Fraser_Response_To_2026-06-01_Questions_.html (https://tinyurl.com/4knrexdf)
Joseph Fraser responded on July 6, 2026:
- Did you remove the officers from the complaint, or did the CRCC? I'd ask that you please explain this in detail.
— "CRCC provided me with the complaints and subject members that they are accepting. Nothing further to explain there. They are the reviewing body and based on your intakes, they make the determination." - Did you choose the provisions listed against each officer in your emails to me, or did the CRCC?
— "I chose the allegations as each subject officer requires a specific allegation assigned to them. What I chose, was the most fitting on our list of allegations." - Did the CRCC advise you of the CSIS case number?
— "I was provided your intake and your 1000 page support docs." - As a Canadian citizen, and you as an RCMP officer, I have reported sexual assault, the planting of GPS evidence, threats against children, fabricated records, and direct threats, supported by audio recordings and detailed technical records. These issues remain unresolved and uninvestigated, and I understand that falls outside the scope of what you are investigating. Can you please advise me as to which police service I should be reporting this abuse to, and provide me with their contact number.
— "Where did the sexual assault take place? The police of jurisdiction will depend on this. Once I receive this information, I will be able to point you in the right direction." - To add the officers clearly and intentionally omitted by the CRCC, who do you recommend I contact to have them added to this investigation?
— "You would have to contact the CRCC directly through the e-mail that you have. You would quote your current intake number that was provided."
As you can see, he confirms the CRCC did in fact remove the officers — the very officers whose inclusion would have shown that the CRCC caused serious issues with both ongoing cases — and advises contacting the CRCC to have this clarified. That much is basic and makes sense. But the rest shows you something very specific about how this record was used. He cites the volume of the submissions rather than answering basic questions. He states that he is the one who chose the provisions used in assessing the officers' conduct. When asked the point-blank question of whether the CRCC provided him with the CSIS number, he dodges — implying it was buried and he didn't see it — when CSIS clearly considered the national security issues reported serious enough to generate a case number. That alone tells you the RCMP should have taken those issues and deferred the case appropriately.
The full list of provisions Fraser assigned — which he confirmed in writing were his own choices — is published here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-06-01_Provisions_And_email_From_Cpl_Joseph_Fraser.html (https://tinyurl.com/33t39ham)
Read what it contains and what it omits. Failing to investigate the sexual assault is formally charged against four members: Welke, Sanford, Hall, and Mews. Failing to return calls is charged against Welke, Mews, and Attewell — allegations that track this record's phone logs and recordings precisely, down to Attewell's "Improper Attitude — by laughing at you," which is on the September 13, 2024 tape. The intake was therefore read closely enough to extract recorded specifics. And yet: no provision anywhere addresses the GPS manipulation, the recorded threats, the "GOOD" response, the fabricated records, or the retaliation — the core of the complaint. Attewell carries no provision for failing to investigate the sexual assault, despite being recorded saying "I'll have a look" and never doing so. Stevens, Allen, and Bushell receive only the unspecified "Public Complaint Process." A reading careful enough to charge laughter cannot have missed the GPS question. What was included measures how deliberate the exclusions were.
Note also what this provisions list does to the RCMP's own prior review. In June 2025, Bushell and Allen closed their investigation in four days without once referencing the sexual assault. In 2026, Fraser — working from the same complainant and the same record — formally assigned "failing to investigate sexual assault" to four RCMP members. Both documents are RCMP work product. If the allegation was derivable from the record in 2026, it was in the record in 2025. Either the four-day closure did not read the file, or it read the file and omitted the allegation. There is no third option, and both belong to the RCMP.
When asked who to take these issues to — which included rape calls, the killing of a dog, GPS data being planted, threats against children, fabricated records, retaliation by the RCMP, and sexual assault, as the shortlist — he leaves out all of those issues and responds only about the sexual assault, deferring on jurisdiction rather than answering the question asked. The provisions he assigned follow the same contour: recorded specifics charged where they implicate least, the core allegations charged against no one. The CRCC completed the pattern by removing from the complaint the officers who are on recordings directly discussing the sexual assault and Jessica Welke — Pye, Charant, and Lechene — so those recordings can never be put to a subject member on the record, along with the senior commanders: Duheme, Daley, and Lucki.
None of this is merely administrative. The RCMP Act imposes a duty on every member to ensure misconduct is not concealed (section 36.2(e)) and makes investigation of Code of Conduct contraventions mandatory, not discretionary (section 40(1) — "shall"). The Code of Conduct requires every member present to report contraventions (section 8.3). The good-faith immunity protecting CRCC staff (section 45.5) does not survive a documented pattern of non-recording, misrepresentation, and dismissal without assessment. And the Supreme Court's test for misfeasance in public office — Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, a case about police officers deliberately failing their statutory duties — applies directly. These recordings, phone records, and analytics exist independently of my account. The factual record can be verified by anyone. The question — stated to the CRCC in the submission itself — is whether the institutions responsible for that verification are willing to do so.
HRP Professional Standards / HRP (Halifax Regional Police)
Detailed Events Long Form Events Involving Jim Perrin, Robin McNeil and Dan Kinsella:
On March 27, 2019, the Wortley Report was released, exposing historical injustices, street checks, and systemic racism within the Halifax Regional Police (HRP).
https://humanrights.novascotia.ca/streetchecks
Shortly after, a judge ordered the practice stopped immediately. Within three days of the Wortley Report, on March 31, 2019, then-Chief of Police Jean-Michel Blais retired.
https://www.halifax.ca/home/news/halifax-regional-police-chief-jean-michel-blais-retire-by-march-31-2019
By April 10, 2019, I submitted a complaint to Irving Shipbuilding regarding how I was being treated, stating I would not be talked to like a dog. Within eight days, on April 18, 2019, I was pointed at in traffic by police and received my first speeding ticket.
On that same day, Robin McNeil, Interim Chief, stated it would be "disingenuous" to apologize after street checks unless additional steps were taken. That same day, Jim Perrin — then Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent — stated that "bias" exists within policing, but would not apologize.
https://www.thestar.com/halifax/halifax-police-say-it-would-appear-disingenuous-to-apologize-after-street-checks-report/article_121f4070-25ca-5aa6-8592-c38165c21742.html
https://halifax.citynews.ca/2019/04/18/bias-exists-says-hrp-superintendent-after-street-checks-moratorium-issued-1381903/
On April 18, 2019, the redacted Mueller Report was released to the public (it had been submitted to Attorney General William Barr earlier, on March 22, 2019). This relates to the involvement and correlations of Torstar, Postmedia, and J.D. Irving.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report
Please see the Mueller Report section for more details and its relationship to this report, EMIC, and 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS.
By May 27, 2019, my wallet was taken from my car. I had been at McDonald's just earlier and had used my card, went to my friend's to eat, came back out, and it was gone. I called my bank and cancelled the cards. Nothing else — such as the change — was taken from the car. Within a few days, I received a call from Halifax Regional Police advising they had my wallet. I went to pick it up on June 5, 2019; based on the HRP General Occurrence Report, it appears the release of the wallet was authorized by Joy Bretzer. There, I went into a room with a female officer. They asked me questions about my wallet and repeated, "You are sure you don't know where your wallet was found?" I stated no, and said I was curious, because nothing else was taken — I had called the bank and cancelled the cards soon after using them, had witnesses, and even GPS data. It was strange that whoever took it didn't take the change from the car, as there was a considerable amount visible. The officer asked if everything was present; I advised it appeared so. The HRP officer stated they couldn't tell me where the wallet was found, as it was part of something "ongoing." Ultimately, this would have been under the control of Jim Perrin, Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit.
By June 17, 2019, there was a job posting on the J.D. Irving website for Physical Security Manager (19002740), which Jim Perrin would ultimately get:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Jim%20perrin%20Job%20posting.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bdf9m7vj)
The EMIC contracts started July 5, 2019 — the same day Dan Kinsella was sworn in as the new Chief of Police for Halifax Regional Police. Later, during an investigation involving Irving Shipbuilding, I would find my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS; the EMIC contract also matched the land transfer events. See the EMIC, SCL Group, and Cambridge Analytica section for more details.
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2019-07-05_EMIC%20Dan%20Kinsella%20Land%20Registration%20Dates.png (https://tinyurl.com/26tvzcu8)
My last day at Irving Shipbuilding was July 26, 2019. HR offered me whatever I wanted. I requested a job interview and asked not to simply be given anything. They stated someone would be in contact with me; this never occurred. However, given that HRP had a case regarding my wallet that they themselves had stated was "ongoing," any open or uncertain case could be used to deny me security clearance — and CSIS, HR, and employees would not know the real reason. This case would have been under the control of Jim Perrin, then Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit and Superintendent.
By November 19, 2019, I received an email about a job with Health Canada. Per Jim Perrin's statements in the audio-recorded meeting of January 27, 2020, this was roughly the same day Jim Perrin was officially transferred to Irving Shipbuilding. His LinkedIn confirms November 2019.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Jim%20perrin%20Job%20posting.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bdf9m7vj)
It is important to state the significant overlap between events on or within a 24-hour window of November 19, 2019:
- Jim Perrin was transferred to J.D. Irving.
- I received an email about a job with the government.
- Dan Kinsella stated there would be an apology for street checks (see Wortley Report).
- Torstar shut down its Halifax office, while Torstar and Postmedia were under investigation for collusion regarding similar behaviour. Around the same period (late March 2019), SaltWire terminated its affiliation with the Canadian Press newswire and became a client of Postmedia and Reuters — placing Postmedia's content into the regional Nova Scotia market, which is relevant to the Postmedia–David Pugliese–J.D. Irving thread.
My complaint was submitted to DND and Harjit Sajjan on November 23, 2019; it had been completed before November 19, 2019. If you follow the events with EMIC, SCL Group, and Cambridge Analytica, it is reasonable to assert that spyware was used to plant GPS evidence on my phone — and therefore reasonable to assert that those parties knew about the complaint if they were monitoring my systems, which the GPS directly supports.
On December 9, 2019, at approximately 8 PM, I submitted the detailed complaint to Audra, HR manager at Irving Shipbuilding — the same manager I spoke with on July 26, 2019. In this complaint, I discussed howling and being talked to like a dog.
On December 10, 2019, I had my job interview at 1505 Barrington Street, Halifax, at about 1 PM. This building is used for various government functions and is where the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) is located. The interview went well; I never mentioned Irving, and they never asked a single question about Irving. The interview was with Marcia Cox. Within about eight hours, as I was leaving the city, I stopped at the McDonald's on Main Street to replenish windshield washer fluid. Within a minute of pulling in, an HRP vehicle with two officers pulled in behind me. They asked if I had seen a woman in a nightdress wandering around. I stated no, and asked if I should contact police if I did. They stated no. My mother, who had mental and physical disabilities, is known for her nightdresses, and HRP had previously had to search for her. This is treated as a TAA 1% event:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_12/2019-12-10%20HRP%20Pulled%20in%20behind%20me%20lookign%20for%20a%20woman%20ina%20%20nightdress%20my%20disabled%20mother%20is%20known%20for%20night%20dresses.png (https://tinyurl.com/38464hv8)
In the dataset, this was listed as a TAA 1% event dated December 12, 2019; however, it represents a span. Over the next few days, my cousin and her neighbours noticed an SUV watching them and their children. Out of concern, the neighbours confronted the person. He got out of his SUV shaking, stated he was a private investigator, and sped away. The neighbours reported this to the RCMP twice as a possible pedophile. The RCMP never contacted them back. My cousin's house was the last listed address on my résumé and on the government papers submitted to Irving Shipbuilding for my employment. They knew nothing about my issues, nor did I live there.
On December 12, 2019, I sent an email to Irving Shipbuilding stating: "I want to make sure that a final opportunity to take a full account of events has again been provided. To this, I will make myself available for a meeting in Halifax tomorrow from 9 AM until 3:30 PM. I'll sign what's needed to discuss this matter and ensure it's all been dealt with and will be investigated. To that, I've delayed sending this out until 3:30 PM tomorrow afternoon to accommodate."
As there was no response, and my friend was very sick, I decided to spend the day with them instead. We got breakfast, then took the dogs for a walk. I decided to leave my phone behind. We walked down an old road toward the river's edge; within minutes of arriving, a small plane flew in very low and circled us. My friend said, "Oh my god, they are flying so low," and asked if I had seen the giant camera. In the job interview on December 10, 2019, they had mentioned having a small plane:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_12/2019-12-10_HRP-DND-RCMP-EMIC-Government-Terrorism-Harjit%20Sajjan-Planecident_december%2012th%202019%20-%20google%20maps%20image%20of%20placecident.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3pbv8yhr)
By December 27, 2019, I had held off installing any advanced security on my computer systems — I didn't want it to appear I was trying to hide anything. I decided to run a significant test: downloading and installing the paid versions of both NordVPN and Bitdefender. Upon downloading the applications — not installing them — early in the morning, the internet for my entire household cut out. I am the only internet user.
By January 14, 2020, Jordan Jacobowski, Director of Human Resources, responded to advise that their investigator, Jim Perrin, would be in contact with me. This was the first time I became aware of Jim Perrin. I immediately conducted a technical, ethical, and security review; he would fail it.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-20_Security_Review_Jim_Perrin_Irving_Shipbuilding.html (https://tinyurl.com/nhcfd9ww)
This review changed the date of our scheduled meeting; it was rescheduled for January 27, 2020 at Irving Shipbuilding. This is where I first met Jodi Posavad.
Jim Perrin asked if they could audio record the meeting. I agreed. Irving Shipbuilding — under section 184 of the Criminal Code, the one-party-consent provision — had the right to record anyway. I had nothing to hide, so I thought it best to cooperate. This way, any of their failures would also be on the recording; and to use any of my failures or quotes, they would have to release the entire recording. Without it, it would be their word against mine.
They were thoroughly outmatched in this recording. To start, I provided them with a detailed report covering some of the abuse, along with predictions about how they would act in the meeting. I predicted it accurately. I gave them each a copy, and a Post-it noting a 17% chance that CSIS and national security laws would be applicable. I did not tell them about the DND complaint of November 23, 2019, nor the government job interview of December 10, 2019. They tried to shame me for asking basic questions when they asked if I had any. Jim Perrin is on audio recording trying to get me to say I am an engineer, while trying to obtain employee names, which would have allowed him to target them. He then shut off the audio recording to tell me he would follow up in two weeks — which he never did. On December 23, 2021, I released a detailed security review of Irving Shipbuilding, including a detailed review of the January 27, 2020 meeting:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December23rd2021_JDIrving_Security_Review.html (https://tinyurl.com/2pjzc59d)
Immediately after the January 27, 2020 meeting, I conducted a security review of Jodi Posavad and found some very concerning exploits. The review concluded she was likely selected because of these exploits, with a non-zero chance she was aware of them in advance. Alongside her technical issues, I also provided the military IP address 216.208.235.222 and screenshots showing that the range was owned by the Royal Military College of Canada, and that the issue was worsening. I advised on how to correct their HR response and all technical issues, and asked them to engage an expert to confirm. A copy of the review is here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-31_Jodi_Posavad_Privacy_and_Security_Review_RMC_IP_Shell_Companies.html (https://tinyurl.com/y5ddjvbe)
In the audio-recorded meeting, Jim Perrin had stated they would contact me in two weeks; this never occurred. At the two-week mark, in the evening, I called Jodi Posavad to ask about it — she did not call back. I called Jordan Jacobowski, who responded stating he was unaware of any follow-up expectation. I called Jim Perrin; he stated he was out with his family and would get back to me — he did not. I contacted him again, and he stated I was never supposed to speak with Jodi Posavad and wasn't allowed to (consistent with her not calling back). He then asked whether I thought "people" were watching. I told him I had only assigned a 17% chance, while noting I had given him military IP addresses. I did not tell him about the DND complaint of November 23, 2019 or the job interview of December 10, 2019. As of January 27, 2020, Jim Perrin had been provided the exact Criminal Code provisions that apply; given that this is our national shipbuilder and involves national defence, this is obvious grounds for that kind of investigation — in no way a reach. He also stated that all the racism and harassment was basically a narrative to target him and the police — while he himself had been transferred as a result of the Wortley Report, and while many of the shipyard's employees are of different cultures and ethnicities. The question was raised, given this background and transfer, of how appropriate it was to have Jim Perrin running this investigation, as it compromised Irving Shipbuilding, every employee he interacted with, and — potentially — our national defence. The line of questioning was intended to protect all parties from that kind of exploit.
On February 14, 2020, I emailed Director Jordan Jacobowski, advising him of this and asking him to confirm that the information in the postings — discussed on January 27, 2020 and captured in the audio recordings — was now being deleted from the job postings. Based on my records, Jordan did not respond to the request.
On February 21, 2020, I submitted a PIPEDA template requesting who had accessed my files and data, while also requesting a copy of the audio recording from January 27, 2020.
By February 25, 2020, Vice President of Human Resources Jim Rennie responded, stating: "...We also reviewed all of the e-mail submissions that you have sent since commencing your complaint..." and "As a result of our internal review, we have concluded that there was no instance of harassment directed towards you by [redacted]. The one instance that you raised in April 2019 was investigated and it was determined that [redacted] would benefit from a coaching session which was held shortly thereafter. You have not provided any credible evidence of fraud nor of a breach of the Canadian Criminal Code."
This means Jim Rennie confirms they read the security reviews of Jim Perrin (January 20, 2020) — and so saw the military IP addresses, knew about the privacy-policy requests, knew the serious technical issues with Jodi Posavad, and knew about the deletion of information from the job postings. He also confirmed the historical complaint of April 10, 2019, which corroborates that timeline with Robin McNeil and Jim Perrin.
By May 25, 2020, the events involving George Floyd occurred, sparking international unrest. On June 10, 2020, I went up to the "corner" and protested racism locally with two signs: "Black Lives Matter" and "I Can't Breathe." We are more than 40 km from an RCMP station, yet two RCMP vehicles showed up, driving back and forth. One eventually stopped at the top of the hill, pointing down, while the other kept driving by. Multiple community members were present and were extremely concerned by the behaviour.
Police stalking: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-10_Police%20Stalking%20June%2010th%202020.JPG (https://tinyurl.com/3t289xf9)
A journalist with the Guysborough Journal showed up wanting to do a story. I initially declined, but my family insisted. She took a picture of me and my dog. The article went live June 17, 2020 — I was on the front page. That same day, the internet to my house was hard cut (TAA 1% event).
Page 1: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Front%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/rycaz93u)
Page 2: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_%20Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Second%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yh72dy8x)
By July 27, 2020, my final letter was ready. I sent it August 5, 2020. The next day, then-Premier of Nova Scotia Stephen McNeil suddenly announced his resignation.
Stephen McNeil is Robin McNeil's brother. The McNeil family has deep, documented ties to Nova Scotia law enforcement: their mother, Theresa McNeil, was Canada's first female high sheriff, and multiple relatives — including former Halifax Deputy Chief Chris McNeil — served in the HRP or RCMP. This family concentration within Halifax-area policing has itself drawn public commentary in Nova Scotia media over perceived conflicts of interest.
https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/stephen-mcneil
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nsvotes2013/profile-stephen-mcneil-guided-by-large-family-1.1927677
Robin McNeil was responsible for the street-checks apology position and partly for Jim Perrin's transfer — so the associations of November 19, 2019 trace back to April 18, 2019. Given this family web across HRP and the RCMP, and Jim Perrin's own connections, the conflict of interest is a central feature of this record, not a peripheral one. And here was Jim Perrin, mocking racism and harassment as some narrative to target them — while they lied in their own recordings, deleted evidence, and police harassed me while I protested racism. And now it was on the front page of the Guysborough Journal — the one newspaper that Torstar, Postmedia, and Brunswick News Inc. (J.D. Irving) don't own or control — while the connections to Torstar and Postmedia on November 19, 2019, and to Dan Kinsella and the street-checks apology, along with the transfer of Jim Perrin to J.D. Irving at that same time, are visible throughout.
Around this time, the mail from ESDC and OPC regarding PIPEDA jurisdiction went missing from my mailbox. It was dated September 15, 2020 — the start date of EMIC Contract #2 is also September 15, 2020. The wolf letter from DND was dated September 19, 2020. All of this correlates with the land transfer events for Residence B.
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-propaganda-exercise-that-caused-panic-about-wolves-on-the-loose-lacked-oversight-investigation-finds
Detailed infographic — Residence B, EMIC Contract #2, and the ESDC letter, showing the September 15, 2020 dates:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)
As requested in my work, I gave the parties six months to make changes. I submitted my letter on August 5, 2020, and McNeil announced his resignation the next day, August 6, 2020. At the six-month mark, Kevin McCoy, President and CEO of Irving Shipbuilding, stepped down (February 5, 2021), and Stephen McNeil formally left office (February 6, 2021). Around the same time, I also detected a signal from a possible IMSI catcher — again correlating directly with the land transfer events for Residence B.
McCoy Steps Down: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/added_2025_02/2021-02-05_Kevin%20McCoy%20President%20of%20Irving%20Shipbuilding%20Stepped%20Down%20Kevin%20Mooney%20would%20take%20over%201%20day%20before%20Stephen%20Mcneil%20leaves%20office.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/f8uphjwj)
As part of disclosure, Halifax Regional Police was included on the main email thread; you can see email delivery confirmations from HRP going back to September 26, 2021:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Add_2024_03/2022-07-11%20-%20Delivery%20confirmations%20of%20ALPHA%20delivery%20to%20HRP.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/2327xhjh)
You will also see major traffic spikes associated with my isolated property in Ecum Secum occurring at the same time:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_Google%20Analytics%20from%202021%20and%202022,%20dates%20showing%20my%20account%20locked%20and%20that%20they%20tried%20to%20delete%20EMCI%20contracts%20.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24rk38fv)
By June 2022, I spoke with a lawyer, who advised that I needed to make a freedom-of-information request to Halifax Regional Police regarding my stolen wallet (May 27, 2019). I pleaded with the lawyer not to make me do this, and asked them to simply speak to these people on my behalf to resolve it. The lawyer insisted. I made the FOI request around May 31, 2022, and received it back on June 23, 2022. It stated it was locked for someone else's privacy. That same day, Kevin Mooney, President and CEO of Irving Shipbuilding, stepped down. When I told the lawyer this, they stated there was nothing I could do and would no longer assist — rather than face the outcome of their own request.
Kevin Mooney Steps Down: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/added_2025_02/2022-06-23_Kevin%20Mooney%20steps%20down%20from%20irvingshipbuilding%20same%20day%20i%20get%20FOI%20back%20from%20HRP%20regarding%20my%20wallet.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/2rxuw24c)
By August 2, 2022, I had TWNN–ALPHA organized, detailed, available, and sent to the main email thread. I have delivery confirmations from HRP dated July 11, 2022:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Add_2024_03/2022-07-11%20-%20Delivery%20confirmations%20of%20ALPHA%20delivery%20to%20HRP.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/2327xhjh)
Before walking to HRP, I walked down to CSIS to provide additional physical copies and asked for an agent; none were available. I then walked to HRP and made a call over their phone system to dispatch, as advised. Two officers showed up: Constables Nick Fairbairn and Sarah Robichaud. I explained that I had this evidence and stated there was a serious issue involving Dan Kinsella. They stated they were in a conflict of interest, given that Dan Kinsella was their Chief and Robin McNeil and Jim Perrin were their former commanders. They said they were getting me a paper to file a complaint — and then simply came back and arrested me, after stating they were in a conflict of interest. They were asked multiple times to please sit down and allow me to file a proper report, but refused. They then generated a false report:
Page 1: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2022-08-02%20HRP%20Police%20Report%201.jpeg (https://tinyurl.com/5yw7e5ak)
Page 2: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2022-08-02%20HRP%20Police%20Report%202.jpeg (https://tinyurl.com/2x3e458a)
At that stage, there were 400+ data points, mostly hyperlinked and all chronologically ordered for reference, along with delivery confirmations showing the materials were sitting in HRP's mailbox — with HRP's auto-reply stating someone would contact me within seven days. There were Google Analytics records showing major privacy spikes, a murdered dog, GPS data planted on my device, "private investigators" reported as pedophiles, Burchell's Lightning Protection and Valent Legal reporting hacking that targeted me regarding this case, multiple correlated resignations (Stephen McNeil, Kevin McCoy, Kevin Mooney), the direct connections to EMIC / Cambridge Analytica, threats against my life, and an extortion attempt for $50,000 — as just the short list. All ordered and prepared by a technical expert who gave ample warning.
They arrested me and took me to QEII Emergency within the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA). There, I was severely abused. NSHA has no statement from any officer regarding why they brought me in. Employees produced false records, retaliated, and created multiple privacy breaches; I was sexually assaulted and denied a lawyer repeatedly, while they also abused my disabled mother. A more detailed report is in the NSHA / CPSNS section.
The day after the false arrest, my neighbour found two RCMP members behind their house at night with flashlights; when confronted, they stated their phone had called 911 and there must be water in the lines. This is exactly where I had detected the signal from a possible IMSI catcher, on approximately January 21, 2021.
By November 3, 2022, Halifax Regional Police conducted a historic vote of confidence in Dan Kinsella: 84% of members voted, and 96.6% voted no confidence. I had serious, quantifiable issues — and so did the officers:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-police-union-no-longer-has-confidence-in-chief-1.6638316
During this period, the EMIC contracts — which match the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief — were deleted from the government website. Here is an infographic showing the contracts were removed from the government site; this was reported to dozens of parties, including the RCMP, on the main email thread:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-2_Proof%20EMIC%20contracted%20existed%20August%2029th%202022%20and%20Sepotember%2015th%20but%20as%20of%20October%2026th%202022%20they%20cant%20be%20found.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24y5d68m)
The RCMP would continue to show up to threaten me through December. By December 27, 2022 i would email the main email thread, speaking directly to Jamie Irving as he was about to take his throne as Executive director of Postmedia. I asked about Donald trump and who was going to say no to him, but in terms of HRP and Racism. I asked a powerful question, that completely circumvents both RCMP and HRP statements about Systemic Racism and Systemic Bias, these system words and reasoning then represented a serious threat to those parties. The prefix to the question posed directly to RCMP was clearly there was severe systemic racism in Policing in Canada, that’s a fact and so “What year did Systemic Racism become Systemic Bias in Canada?”:
(https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December29th2022_Op%20ed%20why%20im%20taking%20Liverals%20Conservatives%20to%20task.html) https://tinyurl.com/383nbem7
This then led to two TAA 1% events on January 5 and January 6, 2023, which correlate with my January 6, 2022 posting about mathematics and a repeat of the earlier events with Judy Ross — a pattern that could be used to discredit me or cause over-association. During this same period, J.D. Irving was awarded another $1.6 billion, on top of Jamie Irving assuming leadership of the company:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2023-01-05_Showing%20TAA%20event%20with%20Judy%20Ross%20and%20Leyla%20Li.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yck326vu)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/arctic-offshore-patrol-vessels-irving-ottawa-deal-1.6703756
On January 29, 2023, my mother passed away. That morning, the Premier of Nova Scotia, Tim Houston, showed up at St. Martha's Hospital in Antigonish, around 1:30 AM. That same morning, a family friend was approached by someone talking about CSIS, who then simply walked away, while neighbours reported lights in my house. Just days before, my aunt had received rape calls. I would release a detailed review of the January 29, 2023 events on February 17, 2023 on the main email thread:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/February17th2023_Mom_Passed_Away_Tim_Houston_Present_At_Hospitol.html (https://tinyurl.com/3bwtet9x)
By March 13, 2023, I gave ample warning that I would be walking to HRP to file a complaint with Professional Standards regarding Dan Kinsella and the false arrest. While there, I spoke briefly with Dean Simmonds (the new Superintendent) and filed my complaint without incident. I also dropped off additional evidence to CSIS. Hours later, I received a call from Jessica Welke of the RCMP stating I was arrestable under the IPTA. She stated she didn't know why they were making her do this, and that she had contacted several departments asking whether she had to.
I complied with every request and order. I was arrested and taken to QEII Emergency. I sat calmly again, asked for a lawyer, and was repeatedly denied. I asked to audio record, as this was clear retaliation — I was denied, and they never recorded that I had asked for a lawyer or to record. One of the officers asked why I was so sure they would just lock me up; I said because Welke would have to go against her director and knows she is facing multimillion-dollar litigation. He was so concerned about NSHA's behaviour that he asked to speak with the nurse outside. It was beyond shocking. I was told that if I didn't speak about it, I would just be locked up — so I acknowledged my bias and listed verifiable facts. I told them about the privacy breach, the sexual assault and that kristen Holm was on Audio Recordings fabricatiing records. Hana Marie Weimer told me, "Obviously you're making this all up." They stated I had made threats; when asked to provide a single threat, they couldn't — nor is anything listed in the internal notes provided. It was fabricated. When police investigated, they were given no examples, even though all correspondence was by email. Because no threats were made, this was a fabrication by NSHA directors to cover up the quantified abuse that occurred and to protect HRP, as both were facing multimillion-dollar litigation. A detailed report is in the NSHA / CPSNS section.
By August 1, 2023, I submitted a formal complaint to CPSNS regarding Nancy Murphy, while also placing calls to HRP Professional Standards. By August 31, 2023, I was served by a bailiff: NSHA had trespassed me from their properties. The document stated I had been at their properties, and that it was read to me and witnessed. I live 150 km from these properties, never said I would be there, was nowhere near them, and there are no statements or threats listed in any NSHA record. It was a complete fabrication — and the same person appears to have completed the entire form, including signing for the witness. I was given pink, yellow, and white copies. I contacted NSHA to ask what it was about; nobody contacted me back. It was a fabrication and retaliation for filing the complaint against Nancy Murphy and reporting privacy breaches, sexual assault, and the fabrication of records.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_12/2023-08-22-%20False%20attestation%20by%20NSHA%203%20copies%20i%20was%20never%20any%20where%20near%20NSHA%20nor%20did%20i%20say%20i%20would%20be.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/5cz6n6bn)
Reasonably, this is why NSHA and involved parties fabricated the false trespass notice — on top of all the abuse reported, and on top of HRP voting overwhelmingly against Kinsella. They knew I was reporting sexual abuse, a major privacy breach involving my wallet, and was asking the right questions about systemic racism. If you assume Dan Kinsella gave the standard two weeks' notice, that places the decision at approximately August 22, 2023 — the same date the fabricated trespass notice was generated. And the entire time, Patrick Curran of HRP Professional Standards was forwarding my complaints and calls directly to Dan Kinsella, when they knew the complaints were directly about him, while refusing to allow me to open a complaint against him — another major privacy breach. It is reasonable to assert that they now knew this complaint was coming, and that I was clearly not backing down.
It is also important to note that upon becoming Premier, Tim Houston personally fired the NSHA Board of Directors on September 1, 2021. He was criticized for removing diversity from the board and instead installing his own associates — most specifically Karen Oldfield. All of these parties were facing serious accountability:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_12/2021-09-01%20-%20Tim%20Houston%20personally%20assigns%20NSHA%20board%20members%20and%20removes%20diversity.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/mw2mmzjd)
As of July 9, 2026, Tim Houston was again being criticized for appointing Karen Oldfield to the newly created position with Accelerate Nova Scotia, a role reported to pay $310,000 per year for at least two years.
On June 30, 2026, Dr. Nicole Boutilier was promoted to President and CEO of Nova Scotia Health.
Is it reasonable to ask whether either of them was involved in, or aware of, the reported sexual assault, the alleged privacy breaches, or the events surrounding Tim Houston personally showing up St Martha’s Hospital on January 29, 2023, the morning my mother died.
From here, Jonathan Jefferies, Patrick Curran and Ron Legere of HRP Professional Standards would continue to fabricate interactions and information. A detailed review of HRP Professional Standards:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-07_Detailed_Complaint_HRP_Professional_Standards.html
Full correspondence with HRP Professional Standards:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-04-03_HRP_Professional_Standards_PC-23-0049_Full_Correspondence_Thread_Scott_Jewers_Jonathan_Jefferies_Patrick_Curran_Ron_Legere.html
Halifax Regional Police (HRP) — The False Arrest of August 2, 2022
On August 2, 2022, I attended HRP headquarters at 1975 Gottingen Street to file a complaint against Chief of Police Dan Kinsella. I did not arrive unannounced or unprepared. I followed the federal standard for a citizen's arrest — seeking out a peace officer rather than acting unilaterally — and presented The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA as documented due diligence: over a year of structured, evidence-based analysis, 400+ chronologically ordered and hyperlinked data points, previously submitted through formal channels to parties including CSIS, HRP, RCMP, DND, and politicians, with confirmed delivery receipts showing it had been sitting in HRP's own mailbox since July 11, 2022:
Delivery confirmations: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Add_2024_03/2022-07-11%20-%20Delivery%20confirmations%20of%20ALPHA%20delivery%20to%20HRP.jpg%20 (https://tinyurl.com/2327xhjh)
Two officers attended: Cst. Nick Fairbairn and Cst. Sarah Robichaud, acting under supervising officer Sgt. Dooks. In HRP's own General Occurrence report, the officers acknowledge telling me that "we as police do not investigate other officers" — a formal, on-the-record admission that they were in a conflict of interest with respect to the complaint I was there to file. Sgt. Dooks explained the Professional Standards process and indicated paperwork was being retrieved so I could file my complaint. She then returned and I was arrested instead, under section 14 of the Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment Act — at the precise moment I was attempting to exercise a formal legal right, by officers who had already declared themselves a conflict of interest. HRP's own report and security video confirm the arrest was "noneventful without any notable resistance or use of force" — I was calm and cooperative throughout:
Page 1: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2022-08-02%20HRP%20Police%20Report%201.jpeg (https://tinyurl.com/5yw7e5ak)
Page 2: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2022-08-02%20HRP%20Police%20Report%202.jpeg (https://tinyurl.com/2x3e458a)
The report the officers generated mischaracterized the interaction throughout — "not making a lot of sense," fixated, "conspiracy" — while omitting the name and existence of the structured research document I had presented and that HRP had held for three weeks. Notably, nowhere in HRP's own report does it state I was "protesting" — the false characterization that NSHA records would later rely on, and which no HRP officer ever corrected.
What followed the arrest occurred entirely under HRP authority and control. I was held in handcuffs for more than ten hours. I was denied access to a lawyer on five separate occasions, despite explicit and persistent requests. I was compelled to discuss the very allegations at issue — involving the Chief, the arresting officers, and their former commander Jim Perrin — while HRP officers remained in direct proximity, under the explicit threat that refusal would result in involuntary admission. My custody was transferred between shifts in a manner HRP's own officers cannot coherently account for: Cst. Stephen Pope has no significant recollection of the interaction, cannot recall removing my handcuffs or whether I had a backpack, and had to be prompted by his partner to remember it at all; I observed only one new officer enter the room. Officer 4 — who was with me throughout the night, said he would stay until 6 a.m., and refused to leave when relieved — was a direct witness to everything and appears nowhere in any HRP record. To this day, HRP cannot say which of its officers removed my handcuffs.
While I was in continuous police custody, my bookbag — visibly labelled with my name, containing my wallet, driver's licence, health card, banking information, and cash — was transferred to Mount Hope before I had even seen a doctor, transported with another patient who was visibly agitated and self-admittedly under the influence of drugs, and who told me the following morning that officers had gone through its contents, including my wallet. Mount Hope's internal note of August 3, 2022 confirms the belongings arrived before me and with the other patient; my contemporaneous email that same morning documents the event in real time. Two non-affiliated HRP officers — who had visibly reacted when I asked, in the waiting room, how much J.D. Irving would pay to stay out of jail — are the officers reported to have accessed my belongings. Neither HRP nor NSHA has ever responded to privacy requests about the transfer, reported the breach, or identified who was responsible.
The arrest itself was the mechanism of everything that followed. By placing me in handcuffs and presenting me to NSHA in police custody, HRP created a false signal to every medical staff member that I had already been assessed through due process and was not credible — a presumption NSHA then acted on, and which is documented in detail in the NSHA / CPSNS section. And this was not HRP's first appearance in the record: the 2019 theft of my wallet, returned by HRP under a case they themselves described as "ongoing," sat under the control of then-Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit Jim Perrin — the same Jim Perrin who transferred to Irving Shipbuilding in November 2019 and who is central to the events in the J.D. Irving and EMIC sections.
Within three months of the false arrest, HRP's own members held a historic vote: 84% of members voted, and 96.6% voted no confidence in Chief Dan Kinsella:
The subsequent handling of my complaint about these events — the removal of the arresting officers, the alteration of the record, and the dismissal without engagement — is documented in the HRP Professional Standards section, with the full detailed complaint available here:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-07_Detailed_Complaint_HRP_Professional_Standards.html (https://tinyurl.com/vdw35bda)
HRP Professional Standards (PC-23-0049) — Jonathan Jefferies, Ron Legere, and Patrick H. Curran
On March 13, 2023, I filed a Form 5 complaint regarding the false arrest of August 2, 2022. The handling of that complaint by HRP Professional Standards — through assigned investigator Sgt. Jonathan Jefferies, Insp. Ron Legere, and former Police Complaints Commissioner Patrick H. Curran — was not a genuine investigation. It was a structured process of avoidance, distortion, and protection of involved parties, and it is documented as such, stage by stage, in my detailed complaint of April 7, 2026:
Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-07_Detailed_Complaint_HRP_Professional_Standards.html (https://tinyurl.com/vdw35bda)
The arresting officers — Sgt. Dooks, Cst. Sarah Robichaud, and Cst. Nick Fairbairn — were removed from a complaint fundamentally about a false arrest, without explanation. Three direct written requests asking why were sent on April 18, 2023, and resent twice; none were ever answered. No statements were ever taken from the arresting officers. When Patrick H. Curran issued his final dismissal, the CC list confirms the retained officers and their solicitor were formally notified — while the officers who carried out the arrest received nothing, were never interviewed, and faced no process of any kind. The recorded call with the Commissioner's office on August 1, 2023 captures this removal being recast as me attempting to "add officers," and captures my correspondence being misrepresented as "27 emails" when the actual number was 10 — three of which were the same unanswered question:
Recorded call: https://youtu.be/AgL7XvLv8NU
The record they produced was materially altered at every level. Jefferies omitted The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA by name from the investigative record entirely — a titled, publicly available, 400+ point research document delivered to HRP with confirmed receipts — replacing it with "tons of research" and "multiple megabytes," ensuring no reviewing party could locate or verify it. He labelled the submission "conspiracy type theories" in the second sentence of his summary, before any analysis. He accepted Kristen Holm's written psychiatric notes without reviewing the audio recording that directly contradicts them — notes which substituted Stephen Harper for Stephen McNeil and Bell Media for Postmedia, substitutions that erased the McNeil-family conflict of interest from the written record. He never challenged the NSHA characterization that I was "protesting" outside HRP headquarters — a claim appearing nowhere in HRP's own General Occurrence report and never made by me. Officer 4, the direct witness to the entire night, does not appear in the record at all.
Ron Legere's Form 11 of July 7, 2023 introduced outright fabrications — including that I claimed Jim Perrin "got me fired," and that Officer 5 arrested me, an allegation I never made — while selectively quoting my statements in ways that materially changed their meaning. The assault allegation, which my written statement explicitly directed at the supervising officer, was reframed as being about the removal of handcuffs, an act nobody alleged was an assault, and dismissed on that basis. Sgt. Dooks — the supervisor who told me she was retrieving paperwork so I could file a complaint and returned to arrest me instead — was never identified, contacted, or required to provide a statement.
Patrick H. Curran then exercised his discretion under s.74(4) of the Police Act on this distorted foundation. He misstated the filing date of my Form 5 as March 15, 2023 when it was filed March 13, 2023 — severing the temporal connection between my filing and the RCMP apprehension that followed within hours. He reframed the torture allegation as exclusively medical to place it outside his jurisdiction, when the allegation explicitly included conduct under HRP authority: more than ten hours in handcuffs, five separate denials of access to a lawyer, and compelled discussion of allegations involving the very officers present, under threat of involuntary admission. He stated there was "no evidence or allegation" of HRP involvement in the transfer of my bookbag — when the April 3, 2023 submission he claims to have reviewed carries that allegation in its title, and when Mount Hope's own internal note of August 3, 2022 confirms my belongings, including my wallet, health card, and banking information, arrived at Mount Hope with another patient before I had even seen a doctor. And his own dismissal concedes in writing that after a full investigation, "it is not clear which one" of two officers removed my handcuffs — an admission that the process could not identify the central actor in the most serious conduct described. When I submitted a detailed rebuttal and personal letter on April 5, 2024 identifying these failures, his complete response, dated April 17, 2024, was a single sentence: the file was closed.
The full correspondence record — from the August 2, 2022 police report through every Form, rebuttal, and response — is preserved and linked in sequence:
Full correspondence thread: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-04-03_HRP_Professional_Standards_PC-23-0049_Full_Correspondence_Thread_Scott_Jewers_Jonathan_Jefferies_Patrick_Curran_Ron_Legere.html
The pattern is consistent and the direction is uniform: the primary actors were removed before they could be tested against the evidence, the record was rewritten into a version easier to dismiss, direct questions were ignored, and the matter was closed without a single document, claim, or timeline entry being engaged with. This matter has been raised with CSIS under Attachment5566 and referred to the RCMP and the Crown Prosecutor of Nova Scotia with a request for criminal investigation of Patrick H. Curran, Ron Legere, and Jonathan Jefferies for fabricating evidence, obstruction, and breach of trust.
CRCC (The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP)
CRCC / RCMP — The Oversight Body That Built the Record It Needed, Files 2023-1031 and R2024-005807
When the police are the subject of the complaint, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission is supposed to be the mechanism that works. This section documents what actually happened when I brought the CRCC a reported sexual assault, fabricated institutional records, GPS evidence planted on my phone, and three years of documented RCMP conduct — and how the CRCC's own intake record became the instrument by which none of it was ever investigated. The full behavioural review, submitted April 13, 2026 and required to be added to both files and escalated to CRCC Human Resources, is here:
Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-13_CRCC_Detailed_Review_and_Behavioral_Analysis.html (https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn)
It begins with the intake. On March 27, 2023, I explained the full context to CRCC intake officer Carole — the reported sexual assault of August 3, 2022 at Mount Hope Hospital, the false arrest of August 2, 2022, the break and enter with multiple witnesses, the GPS manipulation to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, RCMP engagement dating back to September 2021, and Premier Tim Houston's presence at the hospital the morning my mother passed away, January 29, 2023. Her intake record of April 12, 2023 omitted the sexual assault entirely, omitted The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA by name, inverted my stated position — recording that I felt police "had no reason to respond" to NSHA when my complaint was explicitly about leadership-level decisions and not frontline officers — collapsed four separate RCMP attendances of August 16, August 17, November 24, and December 21, 2022 into composite entries, and anchored the entire file to the March 13, 2023 IPTA apprehension, creating a false origin point through which every substantive allegation could be reframed as a mental-health matter. That record became the baseline for every actor who followed. Her omissions became their baseline. Her framing became their framework.
What the record could not erase is on audio. On May 24, 2023, I called Corporal Jessica Welke of the Sheet Harbour RCMP, with my aunt present, and formally requested to press charges regarding the March 13, 2023 false arrest. The call was recorded in full, posted publicly, and provided to the CRCC and to Sergeant Jeff Stevens. At the moment I stated that I had been told that if I even mentioned J.D. Irving I would be arrested and pumped full of drugs, an unidentified voice is audibly heard in the background responding "GOOD" — at timestamp 6:17 of the recording. Welke committed to calling back the following Monday. She never did. Three days after I publicly flagged the recording, on May 27, 2023, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team contacted me. Welke's own recorded words show she was attempting to arrange a meeting with her superiors about these issues and that nobody was getting back to her:
Transcript: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-05-24_Transcript_Of_Call_Jessica_RCMP_Sheet_Harbour_May_24_2023_3_16pm.html (https://tinyurl.com/3jmabkzp)
Audio and video: https://youtu.be/RQ9PlsVuZiI
The reporting was consistent, formal, and confirmed received. The CRCC's own transmission records show detailed submissions — including the sexual assault — formally sent to the RCMP on May 25, 2023, June 22, 2023, September 6, 2023, December 19, 2023, April 3, 2024, and April 11, 2024, and the CRCC's own September 6, 2023 response acknowledges the sexual assault in writing. Sergeant Stevens, across recorded calls of September 25, September 27, December 12, and December 13, 2023, documented on audio the GPS data, possible interference with federal investigations, and the threats toward children and a disabled woman, and stated he was forwarding them to the appropriate authorities.
When CRCC agent David called on August 16, 2024, I described the sexual assault again in detail and asked why no one had followed up on Carole's omissions. His recorded answer was "Carole wouldn't do that." He then repeated her conduct exactly — no documentation of the assault, and the file closed on October 7, 2024, after I had re-particularized everything in writing on September 23, 2024.
Then came the fragmentation. On October 30, 2024, CRCC Complaint Intake Manager Paul confirmed in writing that he had reviewed all prior submissions and issued five pages of questions — including Question 3, which directly addressed the sexual assault. On May 10, 2025, I delivered a 51-page, evidence-based response answering every question he posed: the date, the location, the full reporting chain, and the specific retaliation that followed. He confirmed receipt the same day. He then did not respond for over eight months — until February 10, 2026, two days before the CRCC Review's 120-business-day service standard would have been breached. In between, rather than correcting file 2023-1031, he opened a separate file, R2024-005807, for the substantive allegations — structurally severing the evidence from the file that would decide the outcome. When I submitted my detailed video rebuttal of July 9, 2025, running 83 minutes and 48 seconds, a 60-minute video limit was produced only after the fact — despite my explicit prior request for submission standards — creating a retroactive basis to exclude the evidence that contradicted the record. And through all of it, the CRCC confirmed there is no sitting Chairperson: both files sit in limbo, with no oversight of any of it.
The RCMP executed on the record it was handed. After the case had been open more than 800 days, Inspector Cory Bushell, Sergeant Trevor Allen, and Ignatius Hall opened the investigation on June 1, 2025 and closed it on June 4, 2025 — four days — without ever contacting me. Their Final Report of June 6, 2025 relied exclusively on the IPTA framing introduced on April 12, 2023, used Carole's incorrect dates and quotes, took no written statement from Jessica Welke despite her involvement dating to August 17, 2022, never referenced the May 10, 2025 submission, never addressed the "GOOD" recording, cited Sergeant Stevens while omitting everything Stevens had documented on audio, and attributed to me a statement about the May 24, 2023 call that the public recording proves was never made. A report that ignores a provided recording and inserts a characterization the recording contradicts is not an incomplete report. It is an inaccurate one. My full written and video rebuttal:
July 9, 2025 — Detailed Rebuttal to RCMP: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html (https://tinyurl.com/bde4y9hb)
And here is the contradiction the CRCC cannot resolve. On October 30, 2024, Paul's own questions — drawn from his confirmed review of file 2023-1031 — directly addressed the sexual assault, the Premier's presence at the hospital, and the threats. On April 8, 2026, the CRCC Review stated in writing that file 2023-1031 did not include the sexual assault, election interference, or national security concerns. Both positions rest on the same record. Both cannot be true. One of them is false — and the transmission records, the September 6, 2023 acknowledgment, and Paul's own question list establish which.
The full correspondence record is preserved in sequence:
All CRCC interactions: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/All%20CRCC%20Follow%20ups.html (https://tinyurl.com/369htxj7)
RCMP correspondence: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/RCMP_Correspondence.html (https://tinyurl.com/mrsvpd84)
As it stands on April 13, 2026: 802 days of RCMP silence between March 27, 2023 and June 6, 2025 before a four-day investigation closed the file; over 1,000 days open at the CRCC; an eight-month silence broken two days before a service-standard breach; a reported sexual assault that has never been investigated by any institution at any level; and a review process with no Chairperson to answer to. This matter has been referred to the RCMP with a request for criminal investigation of CRCC conduct, to CSIS under Attachment5566 with a request for security-clearance review, to NSIRA and the Government of Canada with a request for immediate intervention, and to media across Canada with full ATIP access offered. The intake record was constructed on April 12, 2023. Everything since has been built on it — which is precisely why it was never corrected.
OIPC (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia)
History and before Request to Jason Mighton, OIPC to Expedite the Case:
My history with the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia predates every provincial file number in this section. On February 28, 2020, while trying to establish which regulator held jurisdiction over Irving Shipbuilding's handling of my personal information, I contacted the provincial Privacy Commissioner directly. The answer, provided by Julie Young, was that the OIPC had no jurisdiction over PIPEDA or over Irving Shipbuilding's privacy practices, and that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada was the correct venue. On December 6, 2022, Julie Young re-attached that same February 28, 2020 email and confirmed the position in writing: "I can confirm with certainty that Irving Shipbuilding/JDIrving is not subject to or covered by any of Nova Scotia's provincial privacy laws over which this office (NSOIPC) has jurisdiction."
The provincial file itself arises from the events of August 2, 2022 and August 3, 2022. After I walked to Halifax Regional Police headquarters to file a complaint — a complaint HRP responded to by calling themselves a "conflict of interest" and then arresting me — my bookbag was transported to Mount Hope before I had seen a doctor. That bag contained my wallet: health card, driver's licence, banking cards, and cash. Mount Hope's own internal notes, dated August 3, 2022, record that "the clients belongings including wallet was brought to the unit with the previous client mistakenly." A health card is Personal Health Information under NSHA's own policy, signed off by Privacy Director Karen Hornberger, which states that all breaches must be reported for investigation. Person A — the patient who arrived with my bag — told me the next morning that he and two HRP officers had gone through it, and asked if I wanted to "Rock, Paper, Scissors" for one of the twenties inside.
I raised the breach with NSHA. Karen Hornberger's response of May 25, 2023 characterized the matter as one of "patient belongings" that her office "does not typically deal with" — a framing that omits the health card, the financial information, and the identity documents, and does not match NSHA's own internal note. Instead of asking any further questions or clarifying, she closed the case and deferred me to the OIPC. Karen Hornberger was well aware that cases with the OIPC literally take 3+ years to even be looked at, while she knew serious abuse was being reported that needed to be addressed at the NSHA level.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Add_2024_03/2023-05-25%20Reply%20from%20Privacy%20Director%20Karen%20Hornberger.png (https://tinyurl.com/f3pr5n8s)
On the same date, May 25, 2023, the OIPC provided me the process to request a review of NSHA's response under the Personal Health Information Act. On May 30, 2023, the file was formalized: NSHA File 2023-074 became OIPC File 23-00201.
In parallel, I put a direct question to the OIPC arising from March 13, 2023, when NSHA staff prohibited me from recording my own interactions, citing their privacy, and then held me for twenty-four hours in a room with two CCTV cameras recording everything I did. I asked the Commissioner's office whether patients have the right to record their interactions with doctors. Intake Manager Mary Kennedy's answer, March 29, 2023, was that "PHIA contains no right for patients to record interactions with doctors" and that the office could not comment on the Criminal Code. On April 3, 2023, she closed the door entirely: the matter "will not be escalated to the Information and Privacy Commissioner," and "This concludes our communication with you on this matter." The OIPC knows there are no provisions in privacy law which restrict it. Section 184(2)(a) of the Criminal Code specifically allows for it. And the CMPA website states:
"Although patients can record their clinical encounters without a physician's consent, the same does not hold true for physicians. Clinicians who wish to record a clinical encounter should first obtain informed consent from the patient, and that consent discussion should be noted in the medical record. Some Colleges may require the use of a separate consent form for this purpose."
The way the OIPC answered and framed the question allowed it to sidestep what it knew: nothing in PHIA disallows patient recording either. It also made no finding on whether NSHA should reasonably have documented such a privacy request — and its denial of it — in the patient record. In my case, both the request and the denial went unrecorded. That is especially concerning because a sexual assault and privacy breaches by NSHA were being reported at the same time, and so were likewise not recorded. It could easily be argued staff exploited this gap to avoid recording the reported abuse — and the OIPC declined to address that incident even though NSHA squarely falls under PHIA.
On February 22, 2024, I wrote a letter addressed directly to Tricia Ralph, then Privacy Commissioner. It included all the NSHA notes showing the events with my bookbag, the retaliation by NSHA, and the links to Karen Hornberger, Director of Privacy's own documentation directly stating that a health card was PHI and must be reported in SIMS or to Privacy for investigation. And it showed how Karen Hornberger could have asked Mount Hope basic questions and didn't — the details were on the very first page of intake and were made very clear by NSHA's own staff.
Letter to Tricia Ralph: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/April5th2024_OIPC_Tricia_Ralph.html (https://tinyurl.com/4u53axh8)
Image showing letter was mailed through Canada Post: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2024-04-09%20%20Justin%20trudeau%20-Tim%20Houston%20-%20Karen%20Hornberger%20-%20NSHA%20Privacy%20-%20Patrick%20Curran%20-%20Tricia%20Ralph%20Canada%20Post.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/56avaemp)
File 23-00201 then sat in the OIPC's queue, with no response from the OIPC. The office's own 2023-2024 Annual Report documents a multi-year backlog. Through 2023 and 2024 I continued to supply the file with direct evidence — the Mount Hope note, the Hornberger response, the January 15, 2024 CPSNS findings that contradict NSHA's own records, the Section 46 disclosure of my personal and confidential information to Cox & Palmer, where Stephen McNeil holds a prominent role — by email, fax, Canada Post, and public posting, all mirrored at www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com.
July 11, 2024 – Request to Jason Mighton to Expedite Case
On July 11, 2024, following a phone call that morning, Julie Young provided the OIPC's criteria for expediting a file: the matter is urgent and specific; the breach is not yet contained; the breach is systemic; the breach is ongoing or likely to happen again; health and safety concern; and overwhelming public interest. I submitted my written request on the deadline, July 25, 2024, arguing the case met every criterion.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July%2025th%202024%20-%20Request%20to%20have%20OIPC%20Case%2023-00201%20Expedited.html (https://tinyurl.com/mvmyyj8u)
On August 27, 2024, Senior Investigator Jason Mighton denied the request: "Because these criteria have not been met, I cannot expedite the file. Your file will therefore be placed in our queue and will be addressed in the chronological order it was received."
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2024-08-27_OIPC_Expedite_Response_23-00201_NSH22023-074.pdf (https://tinyurl.com/5ycu3d9s)
That denial is the pivot point of this section. A file documenting an uncontained, systemic breach — one NSHA's own notes confirm, one the responsible Privacy Director misrepresented, one entangled with a covered-up sexual assault report which involved multiple premiers — including one who resigned — as well as a Chief of Police — was returned to the back of a multi-year queue.
What followed, through April 2025, were the public complaint submissions naming Tricia Ralph and Jason Mighton and questioning their connections to Karen Hornberger — and more specifically Tricia Ralph's to NSHA directors.
Additional Privacy Breaches Reported – OIPC Retaliated and Fabricated a Submission to Department of Justice (DOJ) / "Unreasonable Behaviour Policy Written Notice"
As per their directions on the OIPC website, on July 16, 2025 I dropped off 5 complaints to the OIPC physical mailbox:
https://oipc.novascotia.ca/contact-us
"... If you wish to provide us with hard copies of materials, please send them by mail, fax, courier or by dropping them off in the mail slot outside our office door...."
On August 13, 2025, I would receive an email from the OIPC with a document "Unreasonable Behaviour Policy Written Notice".
Length:
The notice characterizes the July 16, 2025 delivery as "a 78-page package of materials." The arithmetic deserves scrutiny.
The OIPC's own Review of Privacy Complaint Form is seven pages long in blank form — mostly pre-printed instructions, jurisdictional warnings, and remedies tables. Each of my five completed forms is exactly seven pages; my responses fit within the answer spaces and added zero pages across all five complaints. Thirty-five of the seventy-eight pages are therefore the OIPC's own form.
With the two-page cover letter, the remaining forty-one pages were supporting attachments — roughly eight pages per complaint — and those attachments are not optional. Page 5 of the form instructs applicants to attach a copy of the complaint filed with the public body and the public body's response. Page 7 asks, "Are there any documents, records, or evidence that support your complaint?" and instructs: "If yes, attach them to this form." A "Required Attachments" checklist follows. Eight pages of mandated attachments per complaint — under three pages per required category, spanning multi-year institutional records — is a lean evidentiary package, not an excessive one.
The "78-page package" is therefore thirty-five pages of the OIPC's own template, a two-page cover letter, and forty-one pages of documentation the form itself demands. This is not my accounting imposed on theirs — it is the letter's own: "Your package contained a two-page cover letter and five 'Review of Privacy Complaint Forms' with multiple attachments." Five complaints with their mandated attachments produce a package of exactly this size by design — the OIPC's design. The office then cited the resulting page count as evidence of "excessive demands on the time and resources of OIPC staff." And having declared that communications on these matters "will not be read, will not be responded to and will not be retained," the OIPC has ensured the characterization can never be checked against the package itself.
"Unknown but It Remains Excessive"
The notice's volume finding refutes itself in a single paragraph. The office states that in May 2023 it stopped logging my emails, then concludes: "the true volume of emails from you is unknown, but it remains excessive." That is a finding of excessiveness resting on an admittedly unknown quantity. An office cannot simultaneously declare that it does not know the volume and that the volume is excessive — the second claim requires exactly the measurement the first claim abandons.
The concrete evidence the notice does supply is this: "on September 15, 2021, you sent 3 emails and on September 16, 2021 you sent 4." Seven emails across two days, nearly four years before the notice was issued, is the entire quantified record offered in support of a zero-tolerance conduct finding. The pattern matches the page-count claim: in both cases the office asserts excess, declines to retain or produce the evidence that would let anyone verify it, and asks the characterization to stand on its own authority.
Valid Complaints and Where They Should Have Gone:
The OIPC's rejection letter does one more thing worth documenting: it declines to say where any of the five complaints should have gone. The office's own website hosts "The OIPC's Role - What the OIPC Can and Cannot Do" — the letter links to it. The office knows the jurisdictional map, and referring a complainant onward costs a sentence. Instead, the letter presents the five complaints as an undifferentiated mass — "we are not investigating any of the concerns" — without distinguishing the forms within its mandate from those outside it, and without directing a single one to its proper venue. The effect is to make the complaints look arbitrary, as though they had no proper home, when every one has a designated regulator:
The NSHA trespass and identity theft complaint belonged exactly where it was filed — the OIPC, under FOIPOP and PHIA, alongside the office's own open file 23-00201 against the same custodian.
The Valent Legal complaint belongs with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada under PIPEDA, which governs private-sector organizations — a law firm handling client data included.
The mail interception complaint divides by component: ESDC's handling of the September 15, 2020 letter belongs with the OPC under the federal Privacy Act; interference with mail itself is a Canada Post matter and, as a potential Criminal Code offence (s. 345, mail theft; s. 356, theft from mail), an RCMP matter.
The Curran/Legere/Jefferies complaint severs three ways: the Office of the Police Complaints Commissioner component is provincial — OIPC-reviewable under FOIPOP; the HRP components fall under the Municipal Government Act's own process (a limit the OIPC's form itself states); the RCMP component belongs with the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission; the OPC component with the OPC's designated internal process or the Federal Court under the Privacy Act.
The GPS complaint severs the same way: the Government of Nova Scotia component is squarely OIPC territory under FOIPOP; DND belongs with the OPC under the Privacy Act and National Defence's own oversight bodies; RCMP with the CRCC; JDIrving and EMIC — private companies — with the OPC under PIPEDA.
Every venue on that list is one the OIPC deals with routinely. The office knew the map and chose not to share it. A one-paragraph referral — "forms one and four belong with our federal counterpart; form two is accepted; forms three and five are severed as follows" — would have cost nothing and been the ordinary discharge of its public-facing role. Instead it rejected all five without differentiation, declared future communications would be unread and unretained, and left a citizen to reconstruct the jurisdictional map alone.
And the record shows the reconstruction was never needed. Over the same period, the components the OIPC implies were indiscriminately misdirected were already lodged in their correct venues: the RCMP conduct complaints with the CRCC (file 2023-1031, branched to R2024-005807); the federal privacy matters with the OPC (PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, P-2025-00180); the HRP matters with HRP Professional Standards; the CPSNS matters with CPSNS. The parallel record contradicts the letter's central premise. The July 16 package was not a citizen confusing one regulator for all regulators — it was a citizen placing before the provincial privacy commissioner the provincial privacy dimensions of a documented, multi-jurisdictional record, while the federal, municipal, and professional-body dimensions were already filed where they belonged. The OIPC's letter does not engage with that. It could not characterize the filings as unreasonable if it did.
For an office whose stated mandate includes public education on privacy rights, the omission is not a detail. It is the difference between a regulator administering a boundary and a regulator using one.
Regarding the Review of Jason Mighton:
This is not only a breach of privacy. It represents identity fraud, PHI misuse, and a coordinated attempt to obstruct accountability for sexual assault. For the OIPC to exclude these facts from their characterization of the case is a direct misrepresentation of its scope and gravity.
"The package also contains complaints about your denied request to have your file (23-00201) expedited. This decision is not being revisited, your file will be processed in the order in which it was received."
The OIPC was directly contacted and advised of serious abuse, including sexual assault. I explicitly informed them of the RROSH (Real Risk of Significant Harm), the federal standard for describing the severity of the situation. I personally advised Senior Investigator Jason Mighton of:
- The sexual assault and related abuse,
- The resignations of the Premier (Stephen McNeil), the Chief of Police (Dan Kinsella), a Postmedia Executive (Jamie Irving), multiple US executives with Irving Shipbuilding (Kevin McCoy and Kevin Mooney), and the CSIS Director,
- The RCMP Special Victims Unit case — Case #2025-21595, Phone: 902-220-2013 — and CSIS Case #Attachment5566, Phone: 613-993-9620,
- My role as a global technical expert overseeing a matter with clear national security implications.
The OIPC's response:
Aug 27, 2024, 3:50 PM – Request to Expedite OIPC 23-00201 / NSH 22023-074 From: Mighton, Jason Jason.Mighton@novascotia.ca
"Hello Mr. Jewers, I apologize for the delay in responding to your expedite request. Please find attached the response to your request to expedite your review file 23-00201. Privacy files can only be expedited where the breached information has not yet been contained, the breach is systemic, the breach is ongoing or likely to happen again, or there is a safety concern or public interest. Because these criteria have not been met, I cannot expedite the file. Your file will therefore be placed in our queue and will be addressed in the chronological order it was received. Please hang on to any questions that you might have about the review or materials that you want to submit until you are contacted by an investigator in due course. An investigator will contact you when your file is active. I appreciate your patience. Best regards, Jason Mighton (he/him), Senior Investigator"
This response ignores the direct evidence provided, and the dismissal on the grounds that the "criteria had not been met" contradicts the OIPC's own policy:
- The breach was systemic (PHI disclosed across multiple institutions),
- The breach was ongoing (continued retaliation and disclosures),
- There was an explicit safety concern (sexual assault and threats),
- And overwhelming public interest (multiple resignations at the highest levels of government and security services).
The OIPC was directly informed of a case meeting all of its stated criteria for expedited review and still refused to act. Notably, the denial reasons against no individual criterion — no finding on containment, systemic character, safety, or public interest — only the bare conclusion that "these criteria have not been met." A four-part test was answered with a one-line dismissal, and the July 11, 2024 letter setting out those criteria had placed the burden on the applicant to address them, which the expedite request did, point by point. The submission engaged every criterion; the denial engaged none.
This behaviour — regardless of any input from Scott Jewers — would be viewed as suspicious by security and police agencies, particularly given the documented connections between Tricia Ralph, Karen Hornberger, and NSHA.
Alleged Threats
The OIPC wrote that the package contained "references [to] police investigations against two named OIPC staff members." That is not what was submitted. I never alleged an investigation against Ralph or Mighton. I gave two case numbers — RCMP 2025-21595 and CSIS Attachment5566 — as the existing files their conduct would be reported into, and to which they were asked to self-report. "Investigations against them" implies fabricated, targeted probes. "Here are two active case numbers your conduct would be included in" points at real files. The OIPC rendered the second as the first — then withheld those same case numbers from the Department of Justice, so no one at DOJ could check.
The notice then quotes the passage it labels a specific threat: "I control the first page of global search results for each of your names…I promise you this: I will ensure that your role in this follows you for the rest of your lives. Your friends, families, employers, and neighbors will see the truth…That is my promise to each of you."
Take it clause by clause. "I control the first page of global search results for each of your names" is not a threat — it is a fact, verifiable in seconds at www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com. "Your role in this follows you for the rest of your lives" promises permanence, not a verdict. The internet already records everything permanently — including my own conduct, my own filings, my own errors, all published on the same site under my own name. "Your friends, families, employers, and neighbors will see the truth" alleges no guilt: it does not say you did this or you'll pay for that. It says the truth — whatever the record shows, action or inaction regarding the serious abuse reported — will be visible. If the record shows the OIPC acted properly, then what follows them for the rest of their lives is a record of proper action. A promise to permanently record someone's good deed is no threat at all; the promise only reads as threatening if one presumes the deed will not survive scrutiny.
And the promise is nothing the OIPC does not already live under. The OIPC is a public-facing body. Its decisions, its published reviews, its correspondence on the public record persist forever and follow the office — and me — for the rest of our respective existences. No one calls the permanent public record of a regulator's decisions a threat against the citizens named in them. A citizen maintaining the same kind of permanent public record of a regulator's decisions is no different. A threat imposes a verdict; this defers to a public record where all evidence has been made publicly available, unbiased — which also allows them to defend themselves. That is the opposite of a threat.
"Covertly recording conversations"
The notice's final ground is headed "Covertly recording conversations." It refutes itself in its own first sentence: the package "contains the statement 'all my interactions with the OIPC are recorded.'" I told them. Recording you disclose in writing is not covert — covert means hidden, and I handed them the disclosure. The office labelled as secret the very thing I openly declared to them.
Nor is it unlawful. Canada is a one-party-consent jurisdiction: recording a conversation to which you are a party is expressly exempted from the interception offence by s. 184(2)(a) of the Criminal Code, which excludes a person who has the consent of a party "intended by the originator to receive" the communication. The offence in s. 184(1) applies to intercepting communications you are not part of — not to a participant recording their own call. I was a party to every call. The OIPC's assertion — "Unless you receive permission from the person you are speaking to, you do not have permission to record conversations" — is not the law. Indeed, "the person you are speaking to" is precisely who s. 184(2)(a) says need not grant permission when the recorder is a party to the call.
The office then defeats its own finding. Having called the recording "covert" and impermissible, the notice continues: "If the purpose of the recording is to ensure that you have something to reflect on, we recommend you communicate by emails only. This way, it will be recorded but will not be breaching someone's privacy." In one sentence the OIPC endorses the purpose (a reliable record) and the function (recording) it had just condemned — objecting only to the medium. It even supplies my legitimate reason for me: something to reflect on. That is not the description of unreasonable behaviour. It is the description of a person keeping a careful record, which the office concedes is reasonable in the same breath it files it under the Unreasonable Behaviour Policy. It is a direct contradiction and retaliation for lawful, common sense actions.
The Unsigned Letter
The notice makes personal-conduct allegations against a named citizen and closes: "Yours sincerely, The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia." No named author. No signature. The same letter objects that my package "contains multiple references [to] police investigations against two named OIPC staff members" — the naming of staff is treated as an aggravating feature of my conduct, while the office issues its own conduct findings against me anonymously. A body that considers the naming of its personnel intolerable, while declining to attach a single name to allegations it publishes against a citizen, is asserting an asymmetry, not a policy.
The letter is copied to Corporate Security and the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice therefore received the office's characterization of my conduct — including the claim of "references [to] police investigations against two named OIPC staff members" — without the two case numbers, RCMP 2025-21595 and CSIS Attachment5566, that would have allowed anyone at DOJ to verify what was actually submitted. The office distributed the accusation and withheld the means of checking it, from the one recipient whose function is to check.
OPC / ESDC — The Privacy Regulator That Closed the File Before the Call, Files PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, and P-2025-00180
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is the body a Canadian is supposed to turn to when their personal information is weaponized. This section documents six years of doing exactly that — and what the OPC's and ESDC's own correspondence records show happened each time. The full thread is preserved in sequence:
Full correspondence: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/OPC_ESDC_Correspondence.html (https://tinyurl.com/3d5etpmr)
It begins during the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding. On February 19, 2020, I made my first OPC inquiry — reference PRIVINFO-139143 — regarding my rights to my own HR record, the January 27, 2020 meeting recording, and the access logs. On February 28, 2020, I escalated to the Canadian Privacy Commissioner under PRIVINFO-139757.
This was against a wall Irving's Vice President of Human Resources, Jim Rennie, had already built. On February 25, 2020, Rennie confirmed in writing that Irving had "reviewed all of the e-mail submissions" I had sent, and concluded "there was no instance of harassment directed towards you," adding that I had "not provided any credible evidence of fraud nor of a breach of the Canadian Criminal Code" — this despite having been given the Jim Perrin security review (January 20, 2020) and the Jodi Posavad security review (January 31, 2020), which identified the Royal Military College IP address 216.208.235.222, the technical exploits, the February 21, 2020 PIPEDA request, and the deletion of information from the job postings raised on February 14, 2020. When I sought my own HR record, Rennie stated "there is no legal requirement in Nova Scotia to provide this information," and closed by stating Irving "want[ed] to reiterate that we have investigated your complaint and no further action will be taken," and that he and Irving Shipbuilding "will not be responding to further correspondence." On March 5, 2020, I emailed Rennie and J.D. Irving again, requesting clarification on their privacy policy and PIPEDA applicability; Rennie refused to clarify and reiterated that Irving Shipbuilding would no longer be in contact.
On March 4, 2020, Irving's Privacy Officer replied that "Irving Shipbuilding is a provincially regulated business. Thank you." — and the jurisdictional shell game was complete. On April 29, 2020, I filed the labour complaint with ESDC; on June 25, 2020, the formal PIPEDA inquiry; and on September 25, 2020, the full PIPEDA submission under file PIPEDA-040565. On October 20, 2020, in recorded calls, the OPC's own manager — insisting the matter wasn't federally regulated while conceding the Canada Labour Code provisions — told me "oh, you might get them there."
When I asked, by phone, for the legal authority behind the claimed exemption, Patrick of the OPC told me it was covered by an "Executive order," which I understood to mean an Order in Council. This was said verbally, on that call; on repeated follow-up, no order was ever identified or produced, and no such instrument can be found in the public record. If an Order in Council genuinely exempts Irving Shipbuilding from federal privacy jurisdiction, it has a date and a PC number, and both are discoverable — yet none has ever been named.
Here is the inconsistency the record cannot reconcile. On February 25, 2020, Rennie — the company's own VP of Human Resources, actively defending against my complaint — grounded Irving's refusal in provincial regulation, matching the Privacy Officer's March 4, 2020 line that "Irving Shipbuilding is a provincially regulated business." Neither ever cited an Order in Council or any federal exemption. Yet on October 20, 2020, the OPC's Patrick told me by phone that the matter was covered by an "Executive order." If such an instrument existed, it would be the single most decisive thing Irving's HR head could have named on February 25 to end the complaint outright — and he did not name it, because Irving's position was "provincially regulated," not "federally exempted." The two explanations cannot both be true: either Irving is provincially regulated (Rennie and the Privacy Officer, February–March 2020, no Order in Council involved), or it is federally exempted by an Order in Council (Patrick, OPC, October 2020, never produced). A real exemption is known to the party relying on it. This one changed depending on who was asked, and on what date — and vanished when asked to be produced.
The refusals were not occasional — they were systematic, and they are tallied by date and timestamp. The OPC rejected at least six written requests (June 25, September 26, October 29, November 30, 2020; March 10 and March 23, 2021) to reconcile its own published position — that businesses operating in Canada and handling personal information across provincial or national borders are subject to PIPEDA regardless of where they are based — with the facts of a New Brunswick-registered company operating in Nova Scotia, exchanging data with its parent, international partners, and the Government of Canada. The OPC rejected at least seven written requests to clarify the phrase "without restricting the generality of the foregoing" in the federal-undertaking definition — the exact words PIPEDA omits and the Canada Labour Code contains. ESDC rejected at least eight written requests to define "the day on which the subject-matter of the complaint arose," and at least five more to clarify basic date ranges. Twenty-six written requests, minimum, across two federal bodies, all refused — while Canada's national shipbuilder, building warships under Provision 91(7) of the Constitution Act in the largest ship-construction building in North America, was held to be beyond federal privacy jurisdiction.
On March 19, 2021, the OPC issued its position under PIPEDA-040565: Irving Shipbuilding is not a federal work, undertaking, or business, and contracting with the federal government to build ships does not, by itself, make it one. The full provision-by-provision review that position never answered — PIPEDA against the Canada Labour Code, the Constitution Act, and the Oceans Act — was provided to the OPC, ESDC, privacy lawyer David Fraser, and the main email thread on August 5, 2020, and stands for anyone to evaluate:
PIPEDA applicability review: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-08-05_JDIrving-OPC-ESDC-Government-Stephen%20McNiel-David%20Fraser_OPC%20and%20ESDC%20-%20PIPEDA%20Review%20Image%20-%20Copy.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/ymvtm34v)
And the ESDC letter regarding the jurisprudence decision on the OPC and PIPEDA — dated September 15, 2020 — is the physical mail that went missing from my mailbox, on the same date the second EMIC contract commenced.
The OPC cannot claim it lacked notice of what followed. My email of August 2, 2022 — the day of the false arrest — drew auto-replies from Commissioner Daniel Therrien's own office at 1:36 PM. On August 31, 2023, at 10:59 PM, I submitted the detailed evidentiary response on file PIPEDA-045577, requesting it be forwarded directly to Commissioner Philippe Dufresne: the wallet, the GPS set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, both EMIC contracts matching the two residences, the military IP address, the IMSI catcher, the Burchell's LP and Valent Legal hacking incidents, the Google Analytics spikes, the EMIC contracts deleted from the government website and restored only after I cited the Wayback Machine, and the OPC's own 2020 conduct — stating plainly that this was roughly 20% of the evidence, and asking that someone call me. The OPC's automated acknowledgment arrived at 11:00 PM, one minute later. Follow-ups on September 13, September 27, October 5, and October 19, 2023, and replies through May 3, 2024, produced no substantive engagement with a single enumerated event. Nobody ever called.
On May 15, 2025, I submitted a 51-page complaint — twelve numbered privacy failures, from the May 27, 2019 wallet theft to the January 15, 2024 CPSNS disclosure of my confidential medical information to Cox & Palmer — to the OPC and more than 77 other recipients. What happened on June 4, 2025 is documented minute by minute in the OPC's own words. At 12:34 PM, Senior Advisor Brad Carrier closed file PA-070308 at the intake stage by email, citing section 29 of the Privacy Act, asserting that none of the issues raised fell within it — without addressing any of the twelve points, without one word about CSIS despite the national security content, and signing off "Take care" on a file containing allegations of torture and sexual assault. Point 12 alone — a regulator disclosing my medical information to a conflicted law firm — is a disclosure-of-personal-information matter on its face, squarely within section 29. At 1:12 PM, I returned his call. The recording captures him eating lunch while I described the sexual assault and the national security breaches, stating "we don't initiate investigations," confirming "I'm having a bite of something, yeah," and answering my request for escalation with: "I don't have a manager, Scott." At 1:27 PM, I formally requested escalation to Commissioner Philippe Dufresne. At 1:37 PM, Carrier emailed that he had "already brought this matter... to a manager." Both statements cannot be true. Either he has no manager and no escalation occurred, or his written claim is contradicted by his own recorded words from twenty-five minutes earlier. The file was closed before the call was ever placed — the conversation was never about review. It was about making sure the door could not be reopened. The full review was released publicly on June 8, 2025:
S4E3 — OPC Official Brad Carrier Ate Lunch While Citizen Reported National Security Breach, Sexual Assault, and Torture: https://youtu.be/BE9Bs7owK5k
So on January 24, 2026, I filed request P-2025-00180 under the Privacy Act: all OPC records relating to me and my files — the internal notes, the intake records, the staff communications discussing jurisdiction, PIPEDA applicability, and decisions not to proceed; all communications with ESDC, Irving Shipbuilding, and provincial commissioners; all records involving Bobby Rousson and Brad Carrier; every exemption, executive instrument, or Order in Council relied upon; and the workflow metadata showing when my files were created, accessed, escalated, deferred, or closed, and by whom. The request is aimed at the two moments the OPC never documented: the 2020 exemption that was cited by phone but never produced, and the June 4, 2025 escalation that was claimed but denied on tape. The internal record either substantiates them — or proves they were invented.
The OPC's response, dated January 27, 2026, asked me to supply the file numbers — for files the OPC itself opened, numbered, and closed — before it would begin processing, with a 30-day abandonment clause attached, and advised that complaints against the OPC itself must be mailed to the Privacy Commissioner Ad Hoc at a post office box in Fredericton, reachable by Gmail. On February 19, 2026, Gordini Valery wrote to acknowledge that the January notice itself contained an error, and that the OPC was still waiting on me to proceed. The file numbers they asked me to supply are these: PRIVINFO-139143. PRIVINFO-139757. PIPEDA-040119. PIPEDA-040565. PIPEDA-045577. PA-070308. A privacy regulator that requires the citizen to recite its own file history, routes complaints against itself to a P.O. box, and closes files before returning calls has answered the question I put to it directly and never received a reply to: who, exactly, is a Canadian supposed to turn to? The request is active. The metadata will answer what the correspondence would not — which is precisely why the correspondence was kept off the record.
The Missing ESDC Letter — Its connection to EMIC, J.D Irving, DND, Postmedia and Spyware
The ESDC/OPC letter setting out the jurisdiction determination on my PIPEDA complaint — the document at the center of the year-long "is Irving federally regulated" question — never reached me. It went missing from my mailbox. Its date is September 15, 2020.
Three separate things attach to that date or the days around it:
- The letter itself is dated September 15, 2020 — the physical mail that disappeared before I could receive it, the one document that would have set out in writing the jurisdictional basis I spent twenty-six written requests trying to get defined.
- EMIC Contract #2 commenced September 15, 2020 — the same date. The first EMIC contract matched the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Police; the second matches the date of the letter that went missing.
- The land transfer events for Residence B fall in the same window, and the DND "wolf letter" — the military information operation that caused public panic about wolves on the loose, later found by the Department's own investigation to have lacked oversight — was dated September 19, 2020, four days later.
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-propaganda-exercise-that-caused-panic-about-wolves-on-the-loose-lacked-oversight-investigation-finds
Detailed infographic — Residence B, EMIC Contract #2, and the ESDC letter, all showing the September 15, 2020 date:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)
The non-arrival is not only my account. After the September 15, 2020 letter failed to reach me, ESDC sent its subsequent correspondence by registered mail, requiring me to attend the post office and sign for it in person. An institution does not switch to registered, signature-required delivery for no reason — the switch is ESDC's own implicit acknowledgment that ordinary delivery had failed. The missing letter is documented from both sides: my report that it never arrived, and ESDC's own change in delivery method that followed.
Outside parties would have to argue that I somehow knew about the overlapping dates with EMIC and the howling wolves, and simply decided to claim this letter — or letters — never made it to me. I checked with neighbours and others: no one out here has ever had mail go missing. In 38 years, I have never had mail go missing.
The fact of it is this. Anyone watching my systems would have seen the arguments — the inconsistencies between Jim Rennie's and the OPC's statements, how PIPEDA is written, and that it all looks applicable. We know my phone's GPS location was set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, and that its land transfers match the first EMIC contract, so we know these parties could reasonably see my systems. What they could not see was the decision by ESDC/OPC. And had that decision sided with me, they would have had to give me the audio recording — which would have gone very badly for Irving, DND, the Government, Jim Perrin, and, as we now know, EMIC. They could not monitor OPC and ESDC. The only way they could literally have known the state of that case was by having a copy of the letter. That is a fact. And here, all these dates match.
How could the VP of Human Resources have a different answer than the OPC and ESDC on jurisdiction? Why did ESDC not allow me to open a case, or answer basic questions about which time frames it was using? It is reasonable to assert that they did not want to answer the question. And here is the thing: if there is an Order in Council, what is the date it was created? Was it created only after my February 21, 2020 requests? I told them they had a serious hole and needed to plug it — but my request was already in, and then this occurs. The behaviour looks like them fixing a massive gap that had been identified in the investigation.
Cox & Palmer, Stephen McNeil, and Irving Shipbuilding — The CPSNS/NSHA Privacy Breach, the Unassessed Conflict of Interest, and the Escalation Record
The conflict is documented in the regulator's own transmission records. On January 15, 2024, CPSNS disclosed my personal and confidential information to Colin Clarke of Cox & Palmer via TitanFile — the firm where Stephen McNeil, former Premier of Nova Scotia and brother of former HRP Acting Chief Robin McNeil, holds a senior position, and which has itself acknowledged a conflict of interest regarding J.D. Irving through its work involving Irving Shipbuilding.
When I raised that conflict on the same day CPSNS asked whether I wished to appeal, the files were closed instead. On April 29, 2024 — after the conflict had been explicitly raised — Douglas Grant disclosed additional information to the same firm.
After CPSNS was informed of the conflict and privacy concerns, they initially attempted to claim that I had not reported a sexual assault against a physician. The record clearly shows the allegation was against a physician. CPSNS did not investigate the reported sexual assault, nor did it provide a single support resource or referral.
When Suzanne Husbands was advised of the significant conflicts of interest, she did not conduct what I believe was a proper conflict assessment. Instead, she reprimanded me for taking steps to protect myself from what I believe was abuse and misconduct committed by CPSNS staff. This occurred after I had reported a sexual assault that was not investigated, while also reporting what I believe were multiple fabricated records, retaliation by NSHA and CPSNS, and ongoing threats.
Suzanne Husbands advised that I had until the end of the day on February 20, 2024 to request an appeal. However, at 12:16 PM, she replied stating, "I can confirm you did not request an appeal." At that moment, the review process was effectively terminated, despite my responses raising the privacy breach, conflict of interest, and requests for escalation already being in CPSNS's possession. A deadline described as "end of day" but enforced at 12:16 PM is, in my view, not a genuine deadline.
I continued contacting CPSNS regarding these issues. Eventually, Michelle Ouellette repeated the position that Suzanne Husbands had given me until the end of the day on February 20, 2024 to request an appeal and that I had failed to do so. The record shows that confirmation of "no request" was issued at 12:16 PM, at which point the opportunity for review had already been removed while my responses addressing the privacy concerns and requesting escalation were already in hand.
When this discrepancy was pointed out to Michelle Ouellette, she declined to engage further. In my view, this repeated the same conduct as Suzanne Husbands and reflected a broader pattern of refusing to address the underlying privacy breach and conflict of interest — while failing to inform Cox & Palmer, yet using the fabricated record to have Cox & Palmer retaliate against a complainant. For reference, the correspondence with CPSNS and Michelle Ouellette can be found here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-05-11_CPSNS_Michelle_Ouellette_PHIA_Privacy_Conflict_Concerns_RCMP_CSIS.html (https://tinyurl.com/4z53u9wt)
On April 1, 2026, formal privacy letters were mailed by Canada Post — stamped, tracked, and photographed — to Cox & Palmer and Valent Legal, with identical copies sent by email to Colin Clarke and Jane Elise Bates, Cox & Palmer's designated Privacy Officer.
Delivery confirmation — Jane Bates, Privacy Officer, April 1, 2026:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-04-01_Delivery_Confirmation_CoxAndPalmer_Privacy_Officer_Jane_Bates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/mr4cyjdn)
Physical letters stamped by Canada Post:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-04-01_Privacy_Letters_Sent_To_CoxAndPalmer_And_Valent_Legal.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/5s5f4r55)
Email text as sent April 1, 2026:
https://tinyurl.com/bdd8auy7
On May 10, 2026, recorded calls were placed to the voicemail boxes of Colin Clarke and Jane Bates regarding the conflict of interest (https://youtu.be/aFOFetsvZyg and https://youtu.be/NDka76yN9IE).
On May 11, 2026, a further letter was sent to CPSNS, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, the RCMP, and CSIS (https://tinyurl.com/yuemdsv3), together with a video reviewing the voicemail messages (https://youtu.be/NWqosz3LZL8). No response was received from any of the parties.
On May 18, 2026, the Season Finale (S4E12) was released, combining the recorded voicemail messages left for Michelle Ouellette, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, and the Cox & Palmer main office with a four-part formal letter:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-05-18_Requests_To_RCMP_Criminal_Investigation_Calls_To_CPSNS_CoxAndPalmer.html (https://tinyurl.com/4uuvwfdw)
Full video: https://youtu.be/XWkU9dzkcbA
As part of those submissions, Commissioner Mike Duheme, Commissioner Dan Morrow, and their respective offices were added to the correspondence, requesting investigations into what I believe was the cover-up by CPSNS. Sections were also directed to W5, The Fifth Estate, CTV, Global, Postmedia, and CBC, requesting they investigate what I believe to be serious misconduct by CPSNS and the issues surrounding Cox & Palmer.
Under Attachment5566, CSIS was requested to investigate the matter and extend that investigation to Colin Clarke and Jane Bates. I further requested that, if Cox & Palmer did not respond within five days, the investigation be expanded to include all senior partners of the firm.
A dedicated section addressed Stephen McNeil directly. Similar concerns were raised in the recorded voicemail messages, requesting that he come forward if he possessed knowledge relevant to the conflict of interest — or risk further damage to Cox & Palmer should these issues remain unaddressed.
Cox & Palmer had already been provided with the correspondence exchanged with CPSNS and therefore knew that CPSNS had stated it was Cox & Palmer's responsibility to determine whether a conflict of interest existed. They were also aware of the concerns I had raised regarding the disclosure of my personal information, the potential conflicts involving Stephen McNeil, and the firm's acknowledged work involving Irving Shipbuilding.
They were specifically provided with Michelle Ouellette's May 8, 2026 response, which states:
"With respect to allegations of sexual assault by a different physician, your option is to file a formal complaint. You will need to know and provide their identity on the complaint form before we could consider it. The physician named on the complaint will likely retain legal representation through CMPA, which could possibly result in CMPA assigning the case to Cox & Palmer. It is the duty of lawyers to determine if they have conflicts of interest."
As a result, Cox & Palmer was aware that CPSNS had placed responsibility for assessing any conflict of interest on the firm itself. By not addressing the conflict-of-interest concerns that I raised, I remained unable to proceed with filing an additional complaint regarding the reported sexual assault, because I could not reasonably risk further personal and confidential information being disclosed to the same law firm that employs Stephen McNeil and has acknowledged conflicts involving Irving Shipbuilding.
The concern is straightforward. If the same firm continues to represent the physicians while simultaneously receiving my confidential information from CPSNS, any disputed account of the events — including the reported sexual assault — would naturally be advanced in the interests of their existing clients. Until the conflict and privacy issues are independently addressed, I do not believe it is reasonable to expose additional personal and confidential information to the same parties.
On June 5, 2026, I received a registered mail response from Cox & Palmer, signed by Patrick Fitzgerald, general counsel to the firm.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_07/2026-06-05_registered_Mail_From_Cox_And_Palmer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/32nrfwr6)
The response acknowledged receipt of the physical and electronic correspondence sent to Colin Clarke and Jane Bates on April 1, 2026, the subsequent voicemails, and the correspondence to third parties on which those individuals were copied. It confirmed that "Cox & Palmer received information about you as part of its representation of two doctors against whom you made complaints" to CPSNS — but stated that this information "is protected by solicitor-client privilege" and that the firm "cannot provide access to or further information about that information as requested," closing that it would "continue to protect your personal information in accordance with its internal policies and legal obligations."
The response did not address whether the conflict of interest had been assessed after it was raised, why additional disclosures continued after the conflict had been identified, whether the concerns involving Stephen McNeil or the firm's acknowledged Irving Shipbuilding conflict had been reviewed, or whether CPSNS should have continued disclosing my information after those concerns had been raised. But as the firm confirms it received the calls and correspondence, all of this information was in its possession — so at this stage it is reasonable to conclude that Cox & Palmer Intake, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, and Patrick Fitzgerald are all aware of it.
The response is dated approximately 65 days after my April 1, 2026 privacy correspondence, despite my understanding that PIPEDA generally requires organizations to respond to requests concerning an individual's personal information within 30 days. As a result, while the letter confirmed that Cox & Palmer had received my correspondence and my information from CPSNS, it left unresolved the central issues that had prompted my privacy complaint and escalation.
McInnes Cooper and David Fraser — The Conflict of Interest, the Spyware Testimony, and the Simmonds Connection
David Fraser of McInnes Cooper is one of Canada's leading privacy lawyers, based in Halifax, and a regular media voice on surveillance and spyware. He has been on the distribution thread since the beginning of this matter. This section documents the conflict of interest he declared, the assistance his office declined at the moment I needed it most, the public testimony he gave on the exact subject I had been documenting six days after I was falsely arrested, and the fact that the evidence was placed directly in front of him.
On August 17, 2021, I wrote to Fraser seeking help: "I don't have a lot of money, but I'm willing to pay you to educate me and listen to my story. I can almost guarantee that the underbelly of this issue is unlike anything you or anyone else might expect — and it's fully quantified... So please be blunt; I can handle it and I need your honesty." On August 18, 2021, he replied: "From what I've been able to discern from the message, my firm would have a conflict of interest in providing you with advice in these circumstances. Sorry I can't help." He did not identify the source of the conflict. The declaration is documented here alongside his participation in the July 30, 2020 White Hatter privacy video — the same video deconstructed in my December 23, 2021 security review as an example of inadequate privacy-assessment methodology.
I engaged with Fraser's public work across four detailed reviews, each posted in full:
First review — August 27, 2021: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/August27th2021_AI_Review_%20David_Fraser_Whitehatter_Daniel_Therrien.html (https://tinyurl.com/5hd6cup5)
Second review — December 23, 2021 (within the JD Irving Security Review, including the section documenting how Jodi Posavad failed her security review and the serious privacy issues associated): https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December23rd2021_JDIrving_Security_Review.html
Third review — December 20, 2022: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December20th2022_David_Fraser_Third_Review.html (https://tinyurl.com/ztr8f6uj)
Fourth review — January 4, 2023: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/January4th2023_David_Fraser_Fourth_Review.html (https://tinyurl.com/4ywc5kxy)
Across those reviews I engaged Fraser directly and on his own terms. His yearbook carries the line "What the hell do you think this is, public school?" — a private-school quote that reveals a certain contempt for the everyday public. So throughout the reviews I put the question back to him: how am I doing, for public school? I have no legal background and no firm behind me — I am a self-taught systems analyst from Ecum Secum — and across four detailed reviews I matched and, on the substance, outworked one of the country's leading privacy lawyers in his own field. The point is not personal. It is that the analysis stands on its merits regardless of who produced it, and that the people best positioned to engage it declined to.
This matters because of what Fraser knew and when. He has publicly commented on Cambridge Analytica. EMIC is Cambridge Analytica's sister operation through SCL Group, running Target Audience Analysis contracts in Nova Scotia. On July 30, 2022, I placed it directly in front of him — a single graphic sent to the thread carrying his own yearbook quote alongside the EMIC contract and its director, Gaby van den Berg — ensuring he saw the company, the director, and the connection to the very subject he had spoken about publicly. He cannot claim he was unaware. With all of this evidence listed and delivered, one of the country's foremost privacy experts, commenting publicly on exactly this field, did nothing.
Reference — yearbook quote, EMIC contract, and director Gaby van den Berg on a single graphic: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2022-07-30_David_Fraser_Kevin_McCoy_EMIC_Gaby_Van_Den_Berg_Public_School_Video_Relationships.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/27hh5kuk)
Then came August 2, 2022. While I was falsely arrested and detained, both I and my aunt called David Fraser's office for assistance. His office pushed back before he eventually responded with a general list of lawyers who might handle an IPTA matter. The Mount Hope contact form, in my own hand, lists him by name:
Mount Hope contact form — David Fraser: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2022-08-05_Mount_Hope_Contact_Form_David_Fraser_RCMP_Spyware_Pegasus_Inquiry.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/vf427wpu)
The timing of what followed is the core of this section. On August 8, 2022 — six days after my arrest — the Canadian Press reported that the RCMP had used spyware in 32 investigations since 2017, and that MPs had been told the force's use of such tools was broader than previously reported, with Pegasus specifically discussed. On August 8–9, 2022, David Fraser appeared on CTV National News speaking to the RCMP's spyware use during the parliamentary inquiry into that very subject — spyware, and the setting of device data, being precisely what I had been documenting within TWNN, including the GPS manipulation to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater and the Valent Legal and Burchells incidents. The lawyer whose firm had declared a conflict of interest in advising me, and whose office referred me elsewhere while I was detained, went on national television days later to discuss the exact category of conduct at the centre of my case — after the evidence had already been placed directly in front of him.
The pattern extends to Angela Simmonds. On January 8, 2022, I emailed her office seeking representation regarding the matter with J.D. Irving; her office replied that the message had gone to spam and that, as an MLA, she could not provide legal assistance. On March 13, 2023 — the day I attended HRP to file my Professional Standards complaint and was arrested a second time — her husband, Dean Simmonds, came out, asked if everything was going okay, and then asked everyone else; he was aware I was there. On or about April 5, 2023, Angela Simmonds joined McInnes Cooper as a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor (https://hrlawcanada.com/2023/04/angela-e-simmonds-joins-mcinnes-cooper-as-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-advisor/). Both Simmonds knew of the core issue and knew I had been falsely arrested twice — and Angela Simmonds then joined the same firm whose privacy lead had declared a conflict of interest in advising me, placing her within that conflict as well.
Both Dean Simmonds — a Halifax Regional Police superintendent — and Angela Simmonds were also at the centre of a documented RCMP conduct matter in July 2021. The couple, both Black, said they were racially profiled and ordered out of their vehicle at gunpoint with a C8 carbine during a traffic stop near North Preston. RCMP Inspector Jeremie Landry, then acting Halifax-district chief officer, emailed a select group of Halifax councillors on July 16, 2021 asserting that "at no time were any firearms pointed at them" — while the RCMP's own public statement conceded that "a gun was drawn but not pointed at anyone." The email was released to the public only after being almost entirely redacted by the RCMP, and drew concern from a former police commissioner about the force privately briefing select councillors on an active investigation (Halifax Examiner, October 1, 2021): https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/government/city-hall/rcmp-release-redacted-email-to-councillors-about-traffic-stop-involving-halifax-cop/
The result is a single firm — McInnes Cooper — through which two separate avenues of legal help closed: a declared conflict that was never explained, an office that referred me elsewhere while I was detained, public testimony on the exact subject of my case, evidence placed directly in the hands of a national privacy expert who did nothing, and a subsequent hire who already knew the whole history. Each fact is dated and independently verifiable. Together they document why, at every point I sought counsel on the privacy dimension of this matter, the door was already closed.
Postmedia, the Mueller Report, and the Consolidation of Canadian Media — Summary
This section documents a continuous thread running from October 6, 2016 through January 7, 2026, connecting the American ownership of Canada's largest newspaper chain, the Mueller investigation, the Mark Norman case, Bill C-18, and the events documented throughout this record involving J.D. Irving, EMIC, and the Halifax Regional Police.
The thread begins on October 6, 2016, when Chatham Asset Management — the American hedge fund that controlled the National Enquirer through American Media Inc. — acquired approximately 65% of Postmedia's variable voting shares, placing Canada's largest newspaper chain under the same ownership as the publisher at the centre of documented "catch-and-kill" operations tied to the Trump campaign. On October 12, 2016, a certificate signed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was issued to the registered owner of 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, Nova Scotia. On October 13, 2016, that property recorded a Crown Release from the Department of Natural Resources — its first recorded land event in approximately fourteen and a half years. On October 19, 2016, David Pecker, Chairman of AMI, joined the Postmedia Board of Directors. On January 13, 2017, Vice-Admiral Mark Norman was temporarily relieved as Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, publicly reported January 16, 2017. Norman's lawyers would later state that then-Treasury Board President Scott Brison had attempted to kill the Davie Shipbuilding deal on behalf of the Irving family — placing J.D. Irving directly within the national security thread. These dates are documented as temporal data points within a single convergence window; no causal relationship is asserted.
On November 27, 2017, Postmedia and Torstar completed a swap of 41 community and daily newspapers and announced, the same day, the closure of 36 of them — approximately 300 jobs lost and competition eliminated in specific geographic markets. On November 29, 2017, the Competition Bureau's Cartels Directorate opened a criminal investigation under section 45 of the Competition Act. On March 6, 2018, the Commissioner of Competition commenced a formal inquiry, followed within days by search and seizure warrants executed at the offices of Postmedia, Torstar, and Metroland. On March 22, 2018, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics adopted its motion to study the Cambridge Analytica and Facebook breach, hearing testimony that AggregateIQ operated as a franchise of SCL Group and that no federal privacy law applied to Canadian political parties.
On November 7, 2018, the Irving Shipbuilding position I would later hold was posted. On November 8, 2018, David Pugliese of the Ottawa Citizen (Postmedia) began the directed posting pattern targeting J.D. Irving and DND documented throughout this record as the DPPostingPattern. On November 21, 2018, Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced $595 million in support for Canadian journalism — the foundational origin of what would become Bill C-18. On November 22, 2018, the Competition Bureau served orders requiring Postmedia and Torstar executives to appear for questioning within 120 days. That deadline fell on March 22, 2019 — the same date the Mueller Report was submitted to Attorney General William Barr, a report referencing David Pecker and Dylan Howard, both connected to Postmedia through Chatham's ownership structure. The Ontario Superior Court extended the deadline repeatedly, ultimately to December 31, 2020 — carrying the executives past the Canadian federal election of 2019 and the American election of 2020. On January 7, 2021, the Bureau announced it would not bring the case to court, despite unsealed documents later confirming that the closures and terminations had been pre-coordinated under the internal code name "Lebron," directly contradicting the public statements of Postmedia CEO Paul Godfrey.
On March 22, 2019, the Mueller Report was submitted. On April 18, 2019, the redacted version was released publicly — the same day I received my first speeding ticket, eight days after my April 10, 2019 complaint at Irving Shipbuilding; the same day Acting Chief Robin McNeil stated an apology for street checks would appear "disingenuous"; and the same day Superintendent Jim Perrin publicly stated "bias exists" within policing. On May 8, 2019, Crown prosecutors stayed the charges against Mark Norman in Canada while, that same day, President Trump asserted executive privilege over Mueller Report materials. On May 15, 2019, Trump pardoned Conrad Black, founder of the National Post. On July 5, 2019, the first EMIC contract with DND commenced, Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Halifax Regional Police, and a mortgage was registered at 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater. On November 19, 2019, Jim Perrin transferred from HRP to Irving Shipbuilding, Torstar closed its Halifax office, and I received the Health Canada job email — all on the same date.
The Norman oversight chain collapsed completely. Information Commissioner Caroline Maynard referred evidence of a possible offence to the Attorney General in February 2019 — military officials had altered Mark Norman's name in their own records so it could not be located through Freedom of Information requests. On March 19, 2019, the RCMP declared itself in a conflict of interest and planned referral to the OPP — thirteen days after Ron Taverner withdrew from consideration as OPP Commissioner on March 6, 2019. By about August 4, 2020, the RCMP confirmed to David Pugliese that the referred case had never been started due to an "administrative error." No independent investigation ever took place at any node of the chain.
On February 17, 2022, Postmedia announced its agreement to purchase Brunswick News Inc. from J.D. Irving. Jamie Irving joined the Postmedia Board in April 2022, became Executive Chair on January 1, 2023 — serving alongside Daniel Rotstein, reported in connection with financial arrangements involving Donald Trump and Karen McDougal during the 2016 campaign — and was a prominent figure in the final push for Bill C-18. On June 22, 2023, Bill C-18 received royal assent; the same day, Jamie Irving resigned as Executive Chair. On June 27, 2023, Postmedia announced merger discussions with Nordstar involving the Toronto Star; on June 28, 2023, Prime Minister Trudeau announced Competition Bureau scrutiny; on July 10, 2023, the discussions collapsed. My questions to Sgt. Jonathan Jefferies of HRP Professional Standards naming J.D. Irving, Postmedia, and Torstar were submitted on April 18, 2023 — sixty days before any merger discussions were publicly reported and before royal assent. The questions were not reactive. They preceded the events.
The same predictive structure holds on David Pugliese. This record documented his posting pattern beginning November 8, 2018. On October 24, 2024, Pugliese was accused before Parliament's Foreign Interference Committee of being a Russian asset. On October 3, 2025, an independent forensic review concluded that the documents used to support that accusation were fabricated. Whatever the intent, that sequence resembles dual-purpose tradecraft — and it is why this record treats attribution with caution, including in its own analytics.
The most recent layer is live instrumentation. As documented on October 23, 2025, Google Analytics data shows traffic pulses coupled precisely to Main Email Thread sends and not to social media posts — verified by a skipped-send control on October 16, 2025 that produced no spike. During pulse windows, traffic distributed approximately 38% Canada, 38% China, and 18% Singapore, with Lanzhou and Toronto dominant at the city level, targeted retrieval of the document hub up approximately 1,600%, and — notably — no Russian footprint. Geography is treated as routing, not identity. On January 7, 2026, following the release of S4E7, CSIS Director Daniel Rogers was formally granted access to the site's analytics data, after the site's migration from U.S. to Canadian hosting — following which the anomalous traffic pattern ceased. As of January 6, 2026: 1,238 days since my disclosure to Jessica Welke on August 17, 2022; 802 days of RCMP silence between March 27, 2023 and June 6, 2025, after which the case was closed outside mandated timelines; 1,015 days open at the CRCC; and escalation to the Minister of Public Safety and NSIRA on September 16, 2025 without response.
Taken together: the ownership of Canada's largest media chain by the hedge fund controlling the National Enquirer, a criminal collusion investigation extended past two elections and then abandoned, a defence procurement scandal in which every oversight body failed with a structural explanation, legislation worth over $300 million annually to the same consolidated players, and the documented interlock of these national events with the specific dates of my employment, my complaints, and the contracts and land records of a single property in Stillwater, Nova Scotia. Each convergence is documented as a temporal data point. The pattern is the evidence — and it was mapped in real time, before the events caught up to it.
Target Audience Analysis (TAA) 1% Events
What is Target Audience Analysis:
Target Audience Analysis is not a theory. It is a documented NATO and UK Ministry of Defence methodology, described in NATO's own publications and examined by the UK Parliament.
As laid out by Dr. Steve Tatham — a 26-year UK Armed Forces veteran who commanded the UK PsyOps Group — in NATO's Three Swords Magazine (StratCom Centre of Excellence), TAA is the comprehensive study of a social group across a host of psycho-social research parameters for one purpose: determining how best to change that group's behaviour. It goes beyond opinion polling. It is designed to explain and forecast behaviour, and to produce actionable recommendations for influence campaigns. Critically, NATO's own literature states that TAA can be undertaken covertly — the audience is not necessarily aware they are research subjects, and the role of government or third parties can be made invisible.
- NATO TAA PsyOps section (screenshot): https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/NATO%20TAA%20PsyOps.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/mv63tyw3)
- Full NATO PDF: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2022-08-02_EMIC-TAA-DND-RCMP-HRP-Terrorism-Government-NATO-NSHA_NATO%20Target%20Audience%20Analysis%20TAA%20(Cambridge%20Analytica).pdf (https://tinyurl.com/3r4bvtj6)
The UK defines three tiers of TAA capability. Tier 3 is remote, open-source analysis of a target group — internet-based research aggregated for military usage. Tier 2 is primary research involving actual contact with the audience, largely attitudinal, and is typically undertaken by coalition PsyOps forces. Tier 1 is the full scientific instrument: a multi-source, verified diagnostic methodology conducted in-country, in the target's own language, used to identify the specific motivations behind an individual group's behaviour.
The methodology was developed over 25 years by the Behavioural Dynamics Institute and delivered through SCL Group — the parent company of Cambridge Analytica. When the UK Parliament's DCMS Committee examined SCL, whistleblower Brittany Kaiser testified that prior to 2015 the TAA methodology was considered a weapon — "weapons grade communications tactics" — such that the UK Government had to be notified if it was to be deployed in another country (Disinformation and 'fake news' report, para. 294).
- UK Parliament report: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/179110.htm (https://tinyurl.com/kwhesvay)
Why TAA applies here
EMIC contracts published on the Government of Canada's own procurement website document work of this nature, with dates and details that connect directly to events documented throughout this record (see EMIC Contract #1 and Contract #2, linked in the corpus). This is the reason TAA is treated as a live analytical category on this site rather than speculation: the capability exists, it is documented by NATO and the UK Parliament, it is designed to operate invisibly, and contracts consistent with its use appear on the public record in direct temporal proximity to these events.
The TAA 1% methodology
Because TAA is designed to be invisible, no single event can prove it. That cuts both ways — and it demands discipline. So this record deliberately under-claims rather than over-claims.
Each event listed below is assigned a 1% base probability of being an associated psychological operation event. That means each event, taken alone, is treated as 99% likely to be coincidence, noise, or ordinary explanation. No single entry is offered as proof of anything. The 1% assignment exists precisely to prevent over-association and stacking — the analytical failure mode where every anomaly gets absorbed into a narrative.
What the framework does allow is honest pattern analysis. Independent 1% events should be rare and randomly distributed. When they instead cluster tightly around specific dates — complaint filings, disclosures, FOI responses, legal contact — and repeatedly reference the same addresses, contracts, and thematic material, the aggregate probability that all of them are coincidence shrinks with each addition. The reader is not asked to believe any individual event. The reader is asked to look at the distribution.
Each event below is documented with dates, records, and links where available. Everything is cited so the pattern can be independently verified rather than taken on trust.
TAA Examples:
The Following are considered associated TAA 1% Events.
- Within the first few days after filing the complaint (approximately December 12, 2019, over a few days), my cousin and their neighbours, who live in Porters Lake, noticed a man in an SUV watching their children, who appeared to be taking pictures. They cornered him; he got out of his vehicle and stated he was a "private investigator." It was reported to the RCMP that there was potentially a pedophile targeting children. The neighbours were never contacted back.
- December 10, 2019 — the day after I filed the complaint with Irving Shipbuilding, I had a job interview with the Government at 1505 Barrington Street in Halifax. This is also where the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) is located. Within 8 hours of that interview, two HRP officers pulled in behind me at a McDonald's as I was leaving the city, asking if I had seen a woman in a nightdress wandering around. My disabled mother, whom HRP had previously helped look for, was known for her nightdresses. <link>
- December 12, 2019 — I was in contact with Irving Shipbuilding and advised them I would make myself available in the city. Instead, I stayed in Sheet Harbour with a friend; we went and got food and took the dogs for a walk. I decided to leave my phone behind. Upon arriving at the water's edge, a small plane came in and circled around us with a large camera. My friend stated, "Man, why are they flying so low? Do you see the big camera?" It could have been someone taking pictures of their property; however, given the full context, it's worth mentioning, and aviation records can confirm the event.
- During this investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I also uncovered phishing emails sent from an IP address (216.208.235.222) directly owned by the Royal Military College of Canada. They were received December 4, 2018 — just before the job interview at Irving Shipbuilding between myself, the manager, and the Director. Upon investigation in late 2019, the evidence indicated with a high degree of certainty that they were associated with shell companies used by intelligence agencies, while the IP address was also redeployed to a new geographic location. The server wasn't dead and allowed me to connect through a web browser. These connections would have set off flags inside their systems.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-05-28_Military_IP_Marie_Sommer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/nnba9btk)
- You will see, directly in my complaint of December 9, 2019, I was talking about howling and dogs, and through the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding I specifically used animal behaviour to describe their actions, alongside my detailed professional, technical, and ethical reviews. EMIC, apparently operating out of that address in Stillwater, NS, would then engage in wolves-howling psychological [SENTENCE INCOMPLETE — finish this one]
- While protesting racism locally, 40 km from an RCMP detachment, two RCMP vehicles showed up, stalking me up and down the road. It concerned locals, who were extremely alarmed by the behaviour. When my face appeared in the Guysborough Journal, my internet was hard cut and required a technician to fix it at the line.
- I found my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS. This address appears associated with EMIC.
- Physical mail went missing from my mailbox — the letter deciding jurisdiction from ESDC/OPC regarding my obtaining the audio recording from Irving Shipbuilding. The letter was dated September 15, 2020; the start date of the EMIC contract was September 15, 2022. The land events for Residence B are dated September 14, 2020.
- Google Analytics spikes directly correlate with disclosure in September 2021, jumping into the hundreds when I send emails. This correlates with other large spikes, notably July 28, 2022 — just before the hacking event involving Valent Legal, and my false arrest and torture.
- Burchell's Lightning Protection (BLP) reported that their phone systems were hacked and called me — at the same time I was discussing Burchells LLP (BLLP) on the main email thread, where you can see the spiking.
- An account named Judy Ross attempted to add me on Snapchat in early 2021. You will see her correlation with writing animal books — more specifically, howling wolves — which I would have read as a child. Another significant event occurred in 2023.
- I emailed the main email thread advising that I had correlated events with Postmedia and stated I would not stop until there were criminal charges. The next day, the Liberals and NDP announced a Supply and Confidence Agreement.
- I received a response to my FOI regarding my wallet from HRP the same day Kevin Mooney stepped down as CEO and President of Irving Shipbuilding.
- August 1, 2022 — Valent Legal was hacked, and the attack targeted me with links designed to look like the Government of Canada. Valent Legal was the only legal entity where I had contacted an individual directly. Logs show their server was compromised, and they confirmed they did not send the email. (Consistent with the Burchell's hack in 2021.)
- Three months after my false arrest and torture, HRP held a historic, never-before-done vote of confidence in their Chief of Police, Dan Kinsella. 84% of members voted; 96.5% voted no confidence. During this period, the EMIC contracts were deleted from the government website. I emailed the main email thread twice, indicating to the RCMP that this had occurred and that the contracts were still available on the Wayback Machine, which is admissible in court. EMIC Contract #1 matches the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Police. The contracts only reappeared after my emails and the vote.
- Judy Ross, and then Leyla Li, attempted to add me in early 2023 — Leyla Li being a top physicist and mathematician in the US. I had requested that a physicist and mathematician contact me. If you check the date on the certificate, I was contacted one day before the date it states it was issued.
- Premier Tim Houston showed up January 29, 2023 — the morning my mother passed away. Neighbours reported lights in my house, and a family friend stated someone approached them in line at Tim Hortons talking about being from CSIS, and then simply walked out.
- I was served by a bailiff on August 31, 2023. NSHA was trespassing me from their properties. The letter stated that I was there and that they read the letter to me, providing me with the white, yellow, and pink copies. I was never there, never said I was going to be there, and live over 140 km away. There are no records of me ever causing any issues at NSHA. It was a full fabrication, and it appears the same person completed the entire form, including signing for the witness.
- I received cold calls from Procurement Canada linking back to a realty that may have facilitated the land transfers for 9330, as well as Robert Zed, Jodi Posavad's boss. Nobody on the line, no voicemails, and no follow-up calls. Gaps were specifically left for these players, and these calls filled them.