Below this introduction is an Index and Summary of the institutions, companies, and individuals interacted with during this investigation.

My name is Scott Jewers. I am a technical expert with 18 years of experience in systems analysis, programming, and IT.

Nearly every factual claim in this record can be checked by a third party against a source that does not depend on my word — institutional correspondence, audio recordings, timestamped emails distributed to over a hundred recipients in real time, government procurement records, land registry events, and the institutions' own internal notes. The material is organized institution by institution below.

During an investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I found my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS — an address I had never been to, 40+ km from my home, confirmed across a device restart and in both Grindr and Google Maps. That address is a former Department of Natural Resources property. Its land registry events align with the EMIC Consulting contracts published on the Government of Canada's own procurement portal — EMIC being the firm whose director previously worked for SCL Group, the parent company of Cambridge Analytica, and whose contracted work is described as "Target Audience Analysis," a methodology NATO and the UK Parliament document as psychological warfare. The first EMIC contract began July 5, 2019 — the day Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Police for Halifax Regional Police. The second began September 15, 2020 — the date of an ESDC jurisdiction letter that then went missing from my mailbox. The GPS anomaly appeared shortly after I documented phishing emails traced to an IP range owned by the Royal Military College of Canada, with the headers preserved and published. Every element of this — the registry events, the contract dates and dollar figures, the IP range ownership, the letter's date — is independently checkable.

The military contracts associated with this house allowed for Target Audience Analysis (TAA), which is considered psychological warfare and weapons-grade communications tactics — deployed not only against me but against the Canadian public, and more specifically Nova Scotia, from 2020 to the present. They used "Howling Wolves," which mirrored my work at the time, adding to their goal of making it look like I was watching them, so as to justify their retaliation.

On August 2, 2022, I went to Halifax Regional Police Headquarters to file a complaint against Chief of Police Dan Kinsella. Instead, I was falsely arrested and subjected to physical and psychological torture, including a sexual assault while in the custody of the Nova Scotia Health Authority. The attending officers acknowledged, in HRP's own report, that "we as police do not investigate other officers." HRP's own report records the arrest as "noneventful without any notable resistance or use of force." I was held in handcuffs more than ten hours and denied a lawyer on five separate occasions. Direct evidence, including audio recordings and detailed record reviews, shows that HRP and NSHA staff fabricated records and retaliated against me for reporting serious abuse. The sexual assault, reported within twelve hours to a distribution list of roughly 118 recipients and to NSHA, CPSNS, and the RCMP, has never been investigated by any institution at any level.

The records produced to justify that detention do not survive contact with the evidence. Mount Hope's own internal note of August 3, 2022 confirms my bookbag — wallet, driver's licence, health card, banking information, and cash — arrived with another patient before I had seen a doctor. Psychiatrist Kristen Holm's written record states I focused on "Bell Media, Irving, and Stephen Harper"; the audio recording of the same conversation has her saying "McNeil" by name — Stephen McNeil, brother of former HRP Acting Chief Robin McNeil — at the thirteen-minute mark. That single substitution changed the subject of the conversation in the written record, so that every regulator and police force reviewing it afterward was reviewing a different conversation than the one that occurred.

The RCMP then leaned on those fabricated records and fabricated their own records to justify their retaliation. There are audio recordings and detailed reviews of records that clearly show the abuse. All records and reviews are provided below for independent verification, and can be accessed through the Detailed Index.

The detailed evidence includes evidence of IMSI catchers; massive property spikes correlating with engagement by government and media; companies associated with the case reporting their phone systems hacked; and Valent Legal being hacked and targeting me the day I was falsely arrested and tortured, using links that looked like they were from the Government of Canada.

Before I was arrested on August 2, 2022, I released The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA on July 11, 2022 — 400+ data points, largely hyperlinked, outlining connections between these events. Instead of taking my complaint, HRP stated they were getting me paperwork to file a complaint, then came back and arrested me. Within three months, HRP would hold a historic vote of no confidence against that same Chief — with 84% of members voting and 96.6% voting no confidence — while there are direct connections to the FBI, along with connections to Postmedia, Torstar, and J.D. Irving. During this vote, the EMIC contracts were deleted from the Government of Canada website and only added back after I stated in the email thread that they existed in the Wayback Machine and are legally admissible in court.

To defend against the continued attacks from the RCMP, HRP, and NSHA, www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com was launched June 30, 2023.

My evidence, analysis, and pattern-matching consistently indicate foreign interference in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian federal elections involving actors in — but not limited to — China, Russia, and the United States, as well as domestic interference and the protection of foreign nationals. The evidence further indicates that certain portions of the Canadian Government and its institutions planted evidence on my personal devices, including setting my GPS location to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS — what appears to be a government-owned household (asset) associated with EMIC, which is in turn associated with Cambridge Analytica — to make it appear I was at that location. This occurred just after I found military IP addresses assigned to the Royal Military College of Canada connecting to my systems, along with the associated shell companies and the redeployment of that IP.

The review bridges Bill C-18 (the Online News Act) with the Mueller Report, Cambridge Analytica (EMIC), Postmedia, Torstar, and Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, through the Russian war with Ukraine. It also tracks David Pugliese — a journalist with the Ottawa Citizen and National Post (Postmedia) — years before he was accused of being a Russian spy in October 2024. His posting pattern shows serious statistical evidence that he began a directed attack toward Irving in 2018, correlating with Bill C-18 and the special interests associated with Postmedia and their American handlers at the time. It further details how certain actors appear to have attempted to take over and threaten Canadian media with the direct intention of harming Canada, which is also related to the events involving David Pugliese.

This case will cover police retaliation and abuse and associations with the drug trade in Nova Scotia; sexual assault and the cover-up perpetrated by multiple RCMP officers; the direct fabrication of records by multiple institutions; and retaliation by the OIPC, the Government of Nova Scotia, CSIS, the RCMP, J.D. Irving, CPSNS, and the CRCC for reporting these events, defending myself, and simply asking for an investigation.

In relation to this case, there have been several high-profile resignations that correlate with key disclosures within TWNN: Stephen McNeil (August 6, 2020), Kevin McCoy, Kevin Mooney (June 23, 2022), Jamie Irving, Dan Kinsella (September 6, 2023), David Vigneault (July 4, 2024), and Justin Trudeau (January 6, 2025).

CSIS has formally accepted the case under reference Attachment5566 (February 21, 2025). The RCMP has been formally asked to investigate under file 2025-21595; however, they have retaliated several times, directly covering up the sexual assault and abuse. Elections Canada has been notified but has not responded.

Detailed Index:

9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS – Connecting Spyware and Multiple DND operations
1. Postmedia, Mark Norman, the Mueller Report and the May 2019 Convergence - connecting to EMIC
2. EMIC, Cambridge Analytica, SCL Group, Government of Canada and J.D Irving.
Cox & Palmer, Stephen McNeil, and Irving Shipbuilding — The CPSNS/NSHA Privacy Breach, the Unassessed Conflict of Interest, and the Escalation Record
CPSNS (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia) / NSHA (Nova Scotia Health Authority)
RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service)
HRP Professional Standards / HRP (Halifax Regional Police)
CRCC (The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP)
OIPC (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia)
OPC / ESDC — The Privacy Regulator That Closed the File Before the Call, Files PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, and P-2025-00180
McInnes Cooper and David Fraser — The Conflict of Interest, the Spyware Testimony, and the Simmonds Connection
Target Audience Analysis (TAA) 1% Events
Individual Reviews:
1. Irving
  1. Jodi Posavad (3^rd Party HR)
  2. Jamie Irving
  3. Jordan
  4. Jim Rennie
2. HRP
  1. Robin McNeil
  2. Jim Perrin
  3. Dan Kinsella
  4. Don MacLean
  5. Dean Simmonds
3. CSIS
  1. Daniel Rogers
  2. David Vigneault
4. Government
  1. Tim Houston (NS PC)
  2. Justin Trudeau (Liberal)
  3. Jagmeet Singh (NDP)
  4. Pierre Polievere (CPC)
  5. Ian Ranking (NS Liberal)
  6. Claudia Chender (NS NDP)
  7. Zack Churchill (NS Liberal)
  8. Harjit Sajjan (Liberal)
  9. Stephen McNeil (NS Liberal)
5. Media
  1. Steve Murphy (CTV)
  2. Brett Ruskin (CBC)
  3. David Pugliese (Postmedia)
6. NSHA
  1. Karen Oldfield
  2. Kristen Holm
  3. Shante A Blackmore
  4. Karen Hornberger
  5. Nancy Murphy
7. RCMP
  1. Dennis Daley
  2. Mike Duheme
  3. Brenda Lucki
  4. Jessica Welke
  5. Justin Hall
  6. Chad Samford
  7. Zach
  8. Sherry
  9. Krista
  10. Attewell
  11. Shelly Mews
  12. Stevens
8. CPSNS
  1. Crystal Morgan
  2. Suzanne Husbands
  3. Cindy Campbell
  4. Douglas Grant
  5. Michelle Oulette
9. CRCC
  1. Paul
  2. David
  3. Carole
10. OIPC
  1. Julie
  2. Tricia Ralph
  3. David Nurse
  4. Jason Mighton
11. Lawyers
  1. Angela Simmonds (McInnes Cooper)
  2. David Fraser (McInnes Cooper)
  3. Colin Clarke (Cox & Palmer)
  4. Jane Bates (Cox and Palmer)
12. David Pecker
13. Dylan Howard
14. Daniel Rotstein
15. Donald Trump
16. Kevin Mooney
17. Kevin McCoy

9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS – Connecting Spyware and Multiple DND operations

Postmedia, Mark Norman, the Mueller Report and the May 2019 Convergence – Connecting with EMIC

Following Chatham Asset Management's acquisition of approximately 65% of Postmedia's variable voting shares on October 6, 2016, a series of independently documented events occurred involving Postmedia, the National Enquirer, Vice Admiral Mark Norman, and later developments arising from the Mueller investigation.

Approximately two weeks after Chatham's acquisition, about October 19, 2016, David Pecker, Chairman and CEO of American Media Inc. (AMI), joined the Postmedia Board of Directors.

https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/10/19/executive-from-national-enquirer-parent-joins-postmedia-board.html

Through Chatham's ownership position, this placed the publisher of the National Enquirer within the governance structure of Canada's largest newspaper chain. Pecker would later be identified throughout the Mueller investigation in relation to documented "catch-and-kill" practices used during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

On October 13, 2016 there were would be a land registery event for 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS, “Crown Release DNR”. This wold become important, as in 2020, i would find my phones GPS location set to this household. Reasonably, spyware.

On January 16, 2017, Vice Admiral Mark Norman was temporarily relieved of his duties as Vice Chief of the Defence Staff. His suspension ultimately resulted in a lengthy RCMP investigation and criminal prosecution that attracted significant national media attention, including extensive reporting by Ottawa Citizen defence journalist David Pugliese, a Postmedia journalist. In this case, Spyware was suspected.

Meanwhile, scrutiny surrounding Postmedia itself continued On December 4, 2017, Postmedia CEO Paul Godfrey gave a video interview addressing the Torstar newspaper asset swap, government funding for the newspaper industry, and the Competition Bureau investigation.

https://youtu.be/UwIWpGWKzUQ

On November 22, 2018, the Competition Bureau obtained court orders requiring senior executives from Postmedia and Torstar to appear for examination regarding the 2017 newspaper asset swap. The orders required examinations within 120 days.

https://cba.org/Sections/Competition-Law-and-Foreign-Investment-Review/Member-Articles/An-update-on-the-Torstar-Postmedia-investigation

https://thetyee.ca/News/2021/03/01/Emails-Confirm-Torstar-Postmedia-Knew-Both-Planned-Cuts

Exactly 120 days later, on March 22, 2019, the Ontario Superior Court extended that deadline. The same day, Special Counsel Robert Mueller submitted the Mueller Report to the U.S. Attorney General. The report specifically references David Pecker and Dylan Howard in connection with AMI's "catch-and-kill" practices and campaign-related coordination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_report

Because Pecker simultaneously served on Postmedia's Board of Directors following Chatham's acquisition, these events form a documented chronological overlap between Canadian and American media developments.

A second convergence regarding both Mark Norman and Mueller Report occurred in May 2019. On May 8, 2019, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada stayed the criminal charges against Mark Norman, effectively ending the prosecution. May 9, 2019 is also the same day, U.S. President Donald Trump asserted executive privilege over portions of the Mueller Report, restricting disclosure of underlying materials to Congress.

One week later, on May 15, 2019, Trump granted a full pardon to Conrad Black, founder of the National Post and a central figure in the historical lineage of the Postmedia network. The proximity of these events—the end of the Mark Norman prosecution, executive privilege over the Mueller materials, and Conrad Black's pardon—occurred within a seven-day period.

By may 27, 2019 my wallet would be stolen from my car and end of with Halifax Regional Police (HRP). HRP Would state its part of something ongoing, while it would ultimately be under the control of Jim Perrin, who would soon after get lucrative job transfer to J.D Irving. By July 5, 2019, Dan Kinsella would be sworn in as Chief of Police for Halifax Regional Police and the EMIC Contracts would start.

EMIC Contract and Land Registry Events 9330 Highway #7 Stillwater NS: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2019-07-05_EMIC%20%20%20%20%20AMI%20%20%20%20%20Postmedia%20showing%20matching%20October%202016%20dates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bde6y2mc)

Showing EMIC Matches Date Dan Kinsella Sworn In as Chief: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2019-07-05_EMIC%20Dan%20Kinsella%20Land%20Registration%20Dates.png (https://tinyurl.com/26tvzcu8)

EMIC, Cambridge Analytica, SCL Group, Government of Canada and J.D Irving.

Detailed Index

EMIC (Emic Consulting) is directly linked to SCL Group — the parent company of Cambridge Analytica — through its director, Gaby van den Berg, who previously worked for SCL Group, and through its use of SCL's Behavioural Dynamics Methodology. Cambridge Analytica was involved in a massive scandal that broke in March 2018, in which employees used vast amounts of citizens' information, combined with machine learning, to specifically change the outcomes of elections. The fallout from these events led to billions of dollars in fines for Facebook — including a $5 billion FTC penalty in July 2019 — and ongoing court battles in Canada as of July 6, 2026.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica

The core issue with J.D. Irving started during my employment period, February 4, 2019, until July 26, 2019. During an investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I found my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, Nova Scotia. On July 4, 2022, I correlated the EMIC contracts with this address.

Use www.viewpoint.ca (create a free account) to check the land registry records for 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater; they will show the events for July 5, 2019, but also that the address was owned by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
Check the Government of Canada proactive disclosure portal, which shows the start date of the EMIC contract with the Government of Canada as July 5, 2019 — Emic Consulting Ltd., $615,285.00, work description "Conduct of Training," additional comments "Target Audience Analysis, Ottawa, ON," Organization: National Defence:
https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/?search_text=EMIC
A second contract followed on September 15, 2020, for $653,462.05 — which correlates directly with mail that went missing from my mailbox.

Infographic showing associations of 9330 to EMIC Contracts: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2019-07-05_EMIC%20%20%20%20%20AMI%20%20%20%20%20Postmedia%20showing%20matching%20October%202016%20dates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bde6y2mc)

You will note that it was not disclosed until October 13, 2020 — by Emma Briant — that EMIC was continuing to work for governments; it was then subsequently reported on by David Pugliese of the Ottawa Citizen that EMIC had been contracted by the Government of Canada and that its behaviour-modification training was still in active use.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/canadian-military-spent-more-than-1-million-on-controversial-propaganda-training-linked-to-cambridge-analytica-parent-firms

During this investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I also uncovered phishing emails sent from an IP address (216.208.235.222) directly owned by the Royal Military College of Canada. They were received December 4, 2018 — just before the job interview at Irving Shipbuilding between myself, the manager, and the Director. Upon investigation in late 2019, the evidence indicated with a high degree of certainty that they were associated with shell companies used by intelligence agencies, while the IP address was also redeployed to a new geographic location. The server wasn't dead and allowed me to connect through a web browser. These connections would have set off flags inside their systems.

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-05-28_Military_IP_Marie_Sommer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/nnba9btk)

The original email headers can be found here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2018-12-04_Marie_Sommer_Email_Headers_RMC_IP_216.208.235.222_Irving_Shipbuilding_Pre_Interview.html (https://tinyurl.com/yxrducds)

This information was provided directly to CSIS within TWNN ALPHA, which was released July 11, 2022, and again on August 2, 2022 — before the false arrest by HRP and the subsequent sexual assault and torture.

This IP information was given to investigator Jim Perrin — former Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit with Halifax Regional Police — along with the third-party HR investigator hired to investigate, Jodi Posavad of Grassroots Consulting.
https://www.grassrootshrconsulting.ca/

You will see that a Security Review conducted on Jim Perrin was submitted on January 20, 2020, in which Jim Perrin failed his review:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-20_Security_Review_Jim_Perrin_Irving_Shipbuilding.html (https://tinyurl.com/nhcfd9ww)

We would have a recorded meeting on January 27, 2020, at Irving Shipbuilding; both Jim Perrin and Jodi Posavad failed the meeting catastrophically. By January 31, 2020, I had submitted a detailed security and technical review of Jodi Posavad — she failed horribly, while I provided suggested solutions to each problem found. This is also where I provided the military IP addresses. A copy of the review:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2020-01-31_Jodi_Posavad_Privacy_and_Security_Review_RMC_IP_Shell_Companies.html (https://tinyurl.com/y5ddjvbe)

After providing this, Jim Perrin stated I was no longer allowed to speak with Jodi Posavad, while he did not follow up as he had advised he would. In fact, during the investigation, I advised that they had used job terms from my work in their job postings; these then got changed. On February 14, 2020, I emailed director Jordan Jacobowski, advising him of this, asking him to confirm the information in the postings was now being deleted, and asking why Jim Perrin had not followed up as he had stated he would. In that email, I wrote to him directly:

"Hey XXXXX, I need you to do me a huge favor — as soon as possible and without question. This will help build trust between us."

The postings in question, identified by posting number and timestamp, are:

June 8, 2019 at 4:45 PM — posting #30461078
June 15, 2019 at 6:45 AM — posting #30521702
July 15, 2019 at 5:02 PM — posting #30797801

At this stage, not only had they dismissed the reported racism and harassment as some narrative invented to get them — they had now been dominated in their own recordings, caught changing evidence, alongside the military IP addresses used for phishing. There was also a long history of abuse involving this manager, while there were rumours going around that Irving Shipbuilding was hiring people specifically to blame.

By setting my phone's GPS location to that address, it would make it look like I was spying on these parties, while allowing them to justify further spying to dig for something to use against me — they could just present the data to a judge, who would never question it.

Now, in the dataset I put the date at February 25, 2020. This was not the date — it is for illustration — but it did occur well before June 10, 2020. Detailed logs have been provided to CSIS, August 2, 2022. The event occurred when I was on Grindr, on my phone; I noticed my location was set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS. I restarted my phone — same issue. Confirmed: it also showed there within Google Maps. I have never been to that household, or even close. I figured something was up at the time; however, Jim Perrin was not a trustworthy person. I thought perhaps there was a chance that DND or CSIS were running an investigation into Irving and Jim Perrin, as they would likely have also been concerned about their behaviour. I did not look up the owner until early 2022, and did not correlate EMIC until July 4, 2022.

Now, a small bit of information arises that potentially connects Dylan Howard — who was connected to Postmedia, David Pecker, and Daniel Rotstein — which you can also directly associate to this same property in 2016. AMI, on March 31, 2020, chose to not renew their contract; the next day, April 1, 2020, is when the Wikispooks article regarding Gaby Van Den Berg, Director of EMIC, gets created:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2020-04-01%20-%20Date%20Wikispooks%20article%20was%20published%20on%20Gaby%20Van%20Den%20Berg.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bdvmrd2f)

Shortly after the newspaper events, I would meet a person, which would then lead to what appears to be an extortion attempt aimed at me for $50,000. It involved them allegedly writing a book and using some stories about my life while they tried to get me to do what appeared to be "drugs", with a laptop camera pointed at me. They also made different references to the "royals", and how they had interacted with them. If you check Dylan Howard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_Howard), in August 2019 Howard signed an exclusive deal to publish his true crime titles with Skyhorse and Start Publishing. He published 8 books starting December 3, 2019 through October 5, 2020. One book was "Diana: Case Solved" (17 September 2019) and the other "Royals at War" (30 June 2020) — it is the only topic he duplicated, while "Royals at War" would coincide with meeting with this person. Dylan Howard had also allegedly been involved with events involving spyware going back to Harvey Weinstein.

Now, on June 10, 2020 — after the events with George Floyd on May 25, 2020 — I went out to protest racism locally. Everyone will tell you how respectful and kind I was; I never bothered anyone. I was there to hear all sides and make sure the community was having a discussion, good or bad. I live in Ecum Secum, Nova Scotia, which is 40+ km from an RCMP station or gas station. It is a remote area, yet two RCMP vehicles showed up, stalking me up and down the road. Multiple locals witnessed the events and were extremely concerned about the behaviour. One parked at the top of the hill pointing down, while the other kept driving back and forth:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-10_Police%20Stalking%20June%2010th%202020.JPG%20 (https://tinyurl.com/3t289xf9)

A journalist then showed up and asked if she could do a story. I was hesitant, but family convinced me to do it. She asked if she could take a picture of me, my dog, and my signs. I agreed. On June 17, 2020, the Guysborough Journal released the article — front page, which I didn't know was going to happen. However, on that same day, records indicate my internet was hard cut and required a technician to come work on the lines.

Page 1: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Front%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/rycaz93u)
Page 2: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-17_%20Guysborough%20Journal%20June%2017%202020%20Second%20Page.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yh72dy8x)

By August 5, 2020, I would send a dominating email — inside of it, I would howl — asking the Defence Minister to directly take action. Direct parts of the email were addressed to Jordan, Jodi, Jim, Irving, CSIS, DND, and Harjit Sajjan (then Defence Minister), speaking to systemic racism and abuse. The next day, then-Premier of Nova Scotia Stephen McNeil suddenly announced his resignation. As part of the escalation process, I had requested this investigation be escalated to government.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/2020-08-05_August%205th%202020%20Letter%20Before%20Stephen%20McNeil%20Resigned.docx (https://tinyurl.com/4w9f4utw)

Now, how this is connected to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS, and my phone's GPS location being set there: In the images on the front page of the Guysborough Journal, you will see me holding signs, with my dog — but in the background you will see a Department of Transportation (DOT) truck. The owner of 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS, holds a position at DOT as an Equipment Operator. Eventually, as journalists such as Brett Ruskin and David Pugliese made FOI requests regarding EMIC and Howling Wolves, they found DND had targeted Black Lives Matter protesters — and you will see me holding a sign stating "Black Lives Matter" and "I Can't Breathe" — while they then tried to blame Howling Wolves on Russian disinformation. Now, if you check the registered owner and their social media, they have pictures where they are at Irving Shipbuilding. They also have signed certificates from Justin Trudeau (former Liberal Party Leader and Prime Minister) dating to October 12, 2016, consistent with the land registry event "Crown Release – DNR" October 13, 2016. During my employment, someone randomly came up to me on the street and said, "I think you know Laurie Jewers." I stated that I didn't. They said, "I think you do." The top friend on the address owner's Facebook is Laurie Jewers.

But this doesn't end here. You see, at this same time, DND and the military were involved in the Howling Wolves training exercises in Nova Scotia — consistent with my work during the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, where I used animal behaviour, and specifically howling and wolves, multiple times, including December 10, 2019 in the initial complaint to Irving Shipbuilding, and again August 5, 2020, the day before Stephen McNeil would resign:

Image showing Howling and Stephen McNeil resigning: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-08-06_JDIrving-Stephen%20McNeil-Jim%20PerrinAugust%206th%202020%20Stephen%20McNeil%20resigns.jpg%20 (https://tinyurl.com/2xfbrswm)

Multiple news organizations ran stories on it, including American and global news agencies:

Infographic showing multiple articles as well as the Wolf Letter: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_12/2020-08-03%20-%20Infographic%20of%20Howling%20Wolves%20Articles%20linking%20to%20EMIC%20Contracts.jpg%20 (https://tinyurl.com/3xu4sj7j)

You will see the Wolf Letter is actually dated August 3, 2020, just two days before I sent my letter. You will see it uses the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) letterhead; the 9330 address was owned by DNR, and 9330 shows "Crown Release – DNR" on October 13, 2016, while it is just a few buildings down the road from the DNR office.

But it doesn't stop here.

You see, as part of the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, on February 21, 2020, I made a PIPEDA request for all my information using the official template, including who accessed my files and when, as well as the audio recording made January 27, 2020. On March 5, 2020, the Vice President (VP) of Human Resources, Jim Rennie, would respond stating they were not a FWUB. However, PIPEDA is applicable to all companies who send information between provinces; J.D. Irving is located in New Brunswick, while Irving Shipbuilding is located in Nova Scotia. Other provisions seem to make it directly applicable, especially in regards to ships and Marine Installation Structures. A detailed breakdown of PIPEDA provisions right to the Charter level was released to the main email thread August 10, 2021:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/March24th2021_PIPEDA.html (https://tinyurl.com/3tfevx9c)

I had continued to speak with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) and Employment and Social Development Canada; OPC had advised that they shared resources with ESDC when determining jurisdiction. ESDC would send me a letter regarding this. The letter was dated September 15, 2020; however, I never received it. I contacted ESDC, who confirmed they had sent it — and so it went missing from my mailbox. Now, if you check the government site, https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/, for EMIC, there is a second contract. It started September 15, 2020. There is a residence, which you can see from my place, that is not locally owned/maintained, which then has a land registration event for September 14, 2020:

Infographic showing Missing Letter Date, EMIC Contract #2, and Land Registration events September 2020: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)

Now, as requested in my submissions during the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I gave them six months to correct the behaviour. Six months after the resignation announcement of Stephen McNeil on August 6, 2020 — on February 5, 2021 — Kevin McCoy, then President and CEO of Irving Shipbuilding, stepped down.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/added_2025_02/2021-02-05_Kevin%20McCoy%20President%20of%20Irving%20Shipbuilding%20Stepped%20Down%20Kevin%20Mooney%20would%20take%20over%201%20day%20before%20Stephen%20Mcneil%20leaves%20office.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/f8uphjwj)

The next day, on February 6, 2021, Stephen McNeil formally left office, while Jodi Posavad implemented the security changes recommended January 31, 2020:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_McNeil

What you will also notice in the infographic is land registry events for February 4, 2021. During this period, when setting up a cell repeater, I would use an application called LTE Discovery to point out the direction of the cell towers. During this setup, I got what may have been a hit from two IMSI catchers:

Infographic on IMSI Catchers: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2021-02-01_IMSI%20Catcher%20infographic.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3vy8f89e)

I would release TWNN ALPHA on July 11, 2022. On August 2, 2022, I physically walked to CSIS, dropped off additional evidence, and then walked to Halifax Regional Police (HRP). HRP would call themselves a conflict of interest, state they were getting evidence to file a complaint, and just came back and falsely arrested me. I would then be subjected to torture and a sexual assault while multiple parties generated fabricated reports. Afterwards, HRP officers would hold a historic vote of confidence in their Chief, Dan Kinsella. On November 2, 2022, about 84% of members would vote; 96.6% voted no confidence:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-police-union-no-longer-has-confidence-in-chief-1.6638316

The reason this is important: within a week or so before the vote, after it was known to be occurring, the EMIC contracts — of which EMIC Contract #1 matched the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief — got removed from the government website. I would email the main email thread October 26, 2022 and November 6, 2022, advising dozens of parties, including the RCMP, that they were deleted but available in the Wayback Machine and so legally admissible in court; shortly after, they became available again:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-2_Proof%20EMIC%20contracted%20existed%20August%2029th%202022%20and%20Sepotember%2015th%20but%20as%20of%20October%2026th%202022%20they%20cant%20be%20found.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24y5d68m)

Premier Tim Houston would then show up at St. Martha's Hospital in Antigonish on January 29, 2023, the morning my mother died.

I would send Emma Briant a LinkedIn message March 4, 2024, asking for assistance with the Howling Wolf events and EMIC in Nova Scotia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Briant
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2024-03-04_LinkedIn_Message_To_Emma_Briant_About_EMIC_No_Response.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/56yx5t9t)

During this period, different news organizations would continue to investigate and follow up on the DND and Howling Wolves events in Nova Scotia, including Brett Ruskin of CBC — who apparently got over 1,000 pages through FOI from DND — but also David Pugliese. On October 2, 2024, David Pugliese would release an article about the details, while also stating Emma Briant was taking DND to court over the Howling Wolves event in Nova Scotia:
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/legal-action-under-way-to-force-canadian-forces-to-release-propaganda-documents

While they revealed:

“Godin wrote that Eyre wanted to “discuss how the wolf letter issue could be removed from being conflated with” the $1-million training course on influence techniques that Briant had revealed as well as previous articles on military pandemic propaganda plans.”

Within 22 days, on October 24, 2024, Chris Alexander, former CPC Cabinet member, would go into Parliament as part of the foreign interference committee and accuse David Pugliese of being a Russian asset, providing documents allegedly found in a Ukrainian archive:

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/postmedia-reporter-says-kgb-allegations-are-ridiculous-and-entirely-false

https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2024-10-24_%20Alleged%20evidence%20that%20David%20Pugliese%20of%20Ottawa%20is%20a%20KGB%20Agent%20Page%201.jpg
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2024-10-24_%20Alleged%20evidence%20that%20David%20Pugliese%20of%20Ottawa%20is%20a%20KGB%20Agent%20Page%202.jpg

David Pugliese was the only journalist TWNN specifically followed and consistently noted issues with. What is most concerning here is the overlap of August 4, 2020, where David Pugliese would also push for investigation into Mark Norman; this also correlates with DND Howling Wolves and Stephen McNeil, while David Pugliese consistently reported on EMIC:
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/government-officials-claimed-ontario-police-were-investigating-military-efforts-to-allegedly-hide-documents-in-mark-norman-case-that-turned-out-to-be-false

Now, by December 27, 2024, I would email the foreign interference committee, discussing EMIC, foreign interference, and David Pugliese, noting the move was almost too perfect because it covered for all parties while making it look like some kind of investigation was done into David Pugliese. I stated I was genuinely impressed, as it was basically perfect:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2024-12-27_Foreign_Interference_Commission_Regarding_2019_And_2021_Federal_Elections.html (https://tinyurl.com/ycydnnuu)

Multiple TAA 1% events would follow.

By October 3, 2025, it would come out that the documents that were used to accuse David Pugliese appeared to be fabricated.
https://thewalrus.ca/a-veteran-reporter-was-branded-as-a-russian-spy-the-proof-didnt-hold-up/

CPSNS (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia) / NSHA (Nova Scotia Health Authority)

Detailed Index

NSHA / CPSNS — The Fabricated Records, the Uninvestigated Sexual Assault, and the Regulator That Protected Them

On August 2, 2022, Halifax Regional Police arrested me at the moment I attempted to file a complaint against their Chief and delivered me, in handcuffs, to the QEII Emergency Department of the Nova Scotia Health Authority. Everything that followed occurred under NSHA care, and everything that followed is documented — in audio recordings, contemporaneous emails, and NSHA's own internal records — in my formal complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia dated March 27, 2026, requesting independent investigation of both the physicians involved and the College itself:

Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-27_CPSNS_Formal_Complaint_and_Request_for_Independent_Investigation.html (https://tinyurl.com/4jys92vj)

While in continuous custody, I was kept awake for approximately 24 hours, held in handcuffs for roughly eleven of them, denied access to a lawyer on five separate occasions — "Honey, there is no phone" — and compelled to discuss the very allegations involving the officers present, under the explicit threat that refusal meant involuntary admission. My bookbag — containing my wallet, driver's licence, health card, banking information, and cash — was transferred to Mount Hope before I had even seen a doctor, transported with another patient who was self-admittedly under the influence and who told me the next morning that officers had gone through my wallet. Mount Hope's own internal note, dated August 3, 2022, confirms it: "The client's belongings including wallet was brought to the unit with the previous client mistakenly." That is a reportable Personal Health Information breach under NSHA's own policy, signed by its own Provincial Director of Privacy, Karen Hornberger. It was never reported. It was never investigated. That same morning, August 3, 2022, I reported in writing — to a distribution list of approximately 118 recipients — that I had woken to a man standing over me. I repored to kristen Holm that iw as touched and told “they knoew they arent supposed to touch you” and so it didnt happen. The reported sexual assault has never been investigated by any institution at any level but has been reported to NSHA, CPSNS and RCMP.

The records produced to justify all of this do not survive contact with the evidence. Nancy Murphy, the admitting Emergency physician, recorded that I lived with my parents — I co-owned a home with my severely disabled mother, whom I cared for — recorded claims I never made, recorded nothing about The Wolf and the Neural Network, nothing about HRP declaring themselves a conflict of interest, and later admitted to the College in writing: "on review, I find Mr. Jewers' particular chart is incomplete." The record states I was found "protesting" outside Halifax Regional Police — a characterization that appears nowhere in HRP's own report, was never said by me, and was never corrected by anyone. While there is absolutely no record from any HRP officer about why i was brought in, and so no statement to hold them legally accountable.

The most serious fabrication belongs to Kristen Holm, psychiatrist at Mount Hope. Her written record states I "kept going back to connections between Bell Media, Irving, and Stephen Harper." The audio recording of August 5, 2022 proves the conversation was about Stephen McNeil and Postmedia — Holm says "McNeil" by name, on tape, at the thirteen-minute mark, while telling me my connections were delusions:

Audio, exact timestamp: https://youtu.be/9dGY_N9ni1w?si=1SJPE4w_8YvLiwoo&t=811

Two days earlier, on August 3, 2022, I had emailed 118 recipients: "i only talked about mcneil and postmedia." Neither Stephen Harper nor Bell Media were focused on in the 400+ data points of TWNN ALPHA, released July 11, 2022 and were hardly ever mentioned except in passing research details. This is not a transcription error. Stephen McNeil is the brother of Robin McNeil — former Acting Chief of HRP during the period my wallet was taken, and central to the conflict of interest I was arrested for trying to report. By substituting the names, the written record changed the subject matter of the conversation itself, which means every lawyer, regulator, and police force that later reviewed that record was investigating a different conversation than the one that occurred. Holm's own recorded words — "It wasn't about your behaviour, it was about what you were talking about" — confirm that the content of my speech was the basis of my detention. Then the record changed what I was talking about.

When I filed complaints, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia relied on those same records to dismiss them. Registrar and CEO Douglas Grant — trained in both law and medicine — stated there was "no evidence to suggest" my belongings were moved before my transfer, while the Mount Hope note stating exactly that sat in the materials he claimed to have reviewed in their entirety. While prior, i had supplied the page numbers of the informaiton to CPSNS 5 times and even called Crystal Morgan, lead Invetsigator to ask her if i could supply the section to OIPC. He acknowledged in writing that Murphy's charting was incomplete "particularly in cases where her medical-legal decisions, such as the need for involuntary treatment, may be challenged" — then dismissed the complaint on the basis of that same incomplete record. On January 15, 2024, CPSNS transmitted my personal and confidential information to Colin Clarke of Cox & Palmer — the firm where Stephen McNeil holds a senior position, and which has itself acknowledged a conflict of interest regarding J.D. Irving through its shipbuilding work. When the College asked on February 20, 2024 whether I wished to appeal, I responded the same day, repeatedly, stating the conflict had to be resolved before any appeal could proceed and that the disclosure violated Section 46 of the Medical Act. Suzanne Husbands replied: "I confirm you have not requested an appeal. These files are now closed." My recorded voicemails to Crystal Morgan on February 23 and February 29, 2024 and to Cindy Campbell on March 11, 2024 were never returned. On April 29, 2024, Douglas Grant disclosed additional information to Cox & Palmer — after the conflict had been explicitly raised:

Full record of the Husbands correspondence: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/February20th2024_CPSNS_Suzanne_Husbands_Retaliated.html (https://tinyurl.com/t77wfjhh)

The pattern repeated on March 13, 2023 — the day I filed my Form 5 complaint with HRP Professional Standards. Within hours, I was apprehended again under the IPTA. The QEII triage note claims I had been "sending vague threatening emails... with some threats to doctors" — while the same note records me as calm and cooperative, with good eye contact and good affect. No threat has ever been quoted, dated, or produced by NSHA, the RCMP, or any reviewing body, despite all correspondence existing in email. The note never identifies who initiated the Section 14 request; Corporal Jessica Welke told me directly that it originated from a director within NSHA.

During this apprehension, Hana Marie Weimer denied me a lawyer and refused to allow me to audio record — and did not document that I had asked. She told me that if I did not speak about the issue, I would simply be locked up. I advised her of my bias, that I was aiming for 70%, and of The Wolf and the Neural Network. I told her about the sexual assault, the relation, and my bookbag; about Tim Houston and the neighbours reporting lights in my house; and about the rape calls. Her response: "Obviously you are making this all up."

On August 1, 2023, I filed my complaint against Nancy Murphy with CPSNS. On August 31, 2023, a bailiff served me with a trespass notice from NSHA claiming I had been at their properties — I live 150 kilometres away, was nowhere near them, and the same person appears to have completed the entire form, including signing for the witness. The trespass notice was dated August 22, 2023.

Fifteen days after that notice was dated, on September 6, 2023, Dan Kinsella announced his retirement as Chief of Police. He left office September 15. If a resignation had been tendered internally on or around August 22, a two-week gap before the public announcement would be standard institutional practice — time to brief the Board of Police Commissioners, arrange an interim, and control the messaging. I am not asserting that occurred. I am noting that the dates are consistent with it: the same date appears on a fabricated trespass notice and, working backward from the announcement, on a plausible internal resignation. Readers can weigh the alignment themselves.

This is the closed loop, documented end to end: HRP's false arrest signalled to NSHA that I was not credible; NSHA's fabricated records signalled the same to the RCMP, the CRCC, and CPSNS; and each institution relied on the last institution's characterization rather than the underlying evidence, so that no one — across at least fifteen individuals in four institutions — ever examined what actually happened. The conditions themselves — prolonged sleep deprivation, deprivation of food and water, detention in handcuffs, a sexual boundary violation, and an assessment conducted and relied upon under those conditions — are set against the legal definition of torture under section 269.1 of the Criminal Code and the UN Convention Against Torture in the full complaint, and at minimum meet the threshold of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, incompatible with the evidentiary requirements of the IPTA and Section 7 of the Charter.

This matter has been delivered to Health Canada with a formal request for external investigation of the named physicians and of Douglas Grant's conduct as Registrar, to the RCMP with a request for criminal investigation, to the CRCC, to NSIRA, to CSIS under Attachment5566, and to media and political offices across Canada. The audio recordings exist. The internal notes exist. The emails are timestamped and were distributed to over a hundred recipients in real time. Every claim in this section can be checked against the record — which is precisely why the record had to be changed.

RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)

Detailed Index

When the CRCC asked me to submit individual complaints against the officers involved, I did — against fifteen of them, on their own rules. On May 25, 2025, CRCC Manager Paul instructed in writing that submissions be limited to six pages per officer; on February 24, 2026, he cited the Commission's authority under section 45.68 to merge complaints. Fifteen officers at six pages each allows ninety pages. The submission runs approximately forty-eight, with roughly twenty-seven minutes of video evidence per officer — well within the CRCC's own stated limits. Many of the evidence videos were recorded live while calling the voicemail of Shelly Mews of the RCMP Special Victims Unit, making the recordings part of the RCMP's own communication record. Shelly Mews never responded to a single one, while there is direct evidence she was deleting the voicemails — deleting evidence to cover up her own fabrications and retaliation in this matter.

The full submission, delivered March 16, 2026 to the CRCC, CSIS under Attachment5566, NSIRA, every provincial premier, federal party leaders, and newsrooms across Canada:
Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-16_CRCC%20Detailed%20submission%20regarding%20mutiple%20officers.html (https://tinyurl.com/yuafunmy)

The record establishes that none of this was unknown. When contacted, the RCMP stated in September 2021 that they were aware of and monitoring the complaint thread. When I emailed hundreds of recipients on October 26, 2022 and November 6, 2022 advising that the EMIC contracts were being removed from the federal government website, RCMP officers attended my residence because of those emails. The officers who attended, and the officers who reviewed the emails, acknowledged that nothing in them was threatening and that they raised a legitimate concern.

On July 27, 2023, I attended both the Sheet Harbour and Sherbrooke detachments in person, on camera, and submitted detailed evidence; neither detachment made a record or ever contacted me. On March 13, 2024, I stood across from the Sheet Harbour detachment with two signs — "How did my GPS get set to 9330 Stillwater NS" and "Sheet Harbour RCMP Framed and Terrorized Me and My Disabled Mother" — and members of the public stopped to tell me they had been framed by that detachment too. The failure to act was not the result of a lack of notice. It was a choice.

The officer sections follow one skeleton: a recorded interaction, a specific commitment, and the documented breach. Corporal Jessica Welke — commanding officer of Sheet Harbour, the supervisor of nearly every other officer named — is on the May 24, 2023 recording hearing me state "I have to officially press charges," hearing me report that I had been told that if I even mentioned J.D. Irving I would be arrested and pumped full of drugs — at which moment an unidentified voice in the background responds "GOOD" — and saying, verbatim, "I will call you Monday." Jessica Welke never called. Three days after I publicly flagged the recording, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team contacted me instead.
https://youtu.be/6bxtmFj8EVk

On February 12, 2023, after rape calls were reported, along with a vehicle then parked outside my elderly aunt's house, Constable Justin Hall asked me himself, at my aunt's residence, "Scott, you don't think this is related to that other stuff going on, do you?" — proof he could connect the pattern — and opened nothing. Prior to this, Constable Chad Sanford had stated openly that they were looking for a reason to charge me, and asked what it would take to end the matter. I told him: open a case, and have Commissioner Brenda Lucki's office contact me. Neither happened.

The rape calls were not anonymous noise. The caller's phone number was provided to the RCMP, and it belongs to the same individual alleged in an earlier reported incident to have killed a dog. The vehicle recorded on video outside my elderly aunt's house appears to belong to a member of the same family. Part of the abuse reported to the RCMP also included a photograph of an RCMP vest found at a suspected drug pickup location, alongside statements made to me directly by community members — repeated openly across this community for years — that the local RCMP has been bought off. I make no assertion about any private individual's guilt; that is what investigations are for. What the record documents is that a named suspect, a phone number, video evidence, and a photographed vest were all placed in the RCMP's hands, and produced no case, no record, and no follow-up of any kind — while what followed instead, on tape, was Sheet Harbour members threatening me and fabricating records. Whether that pattern reflects the long-documented practice of police tolerating compromised parties in exchange for looking away, readers can weigh for themselves. What is documented is the inputs the RCMP received, and the absence of any output.

Sergeant Stevens — assigned by the CRCC itself — appears on three recordings: September 27, December 12, and December 13, 2023. On the September 27 call, he defines his mandate in his own words: "My role is to investigate wrongdoing by RCMP when it comes to you." On December 12, he confirms he received and reviewed the CRCC submissions and video links, writes down the central question — how my GPS location was set to 9330 Highway 7, Stillwater, NS — and acknowledges the core allegation on tape: "you tried to open the case and... you were denied that... it's something that I would look into." He records my requested resolution, including the resignations requested, and closes with a commitment: "somebody will be in touch with you." Nobody ever was. Given the documented threats and the arrest that followed my last attempt to sit down with officers, I declined to provide a statement in a room at a detachment; Stevens accepted that on the recording and stated he would "paint the full picture" for the decision-makers regardless.

On December 13, I asked him directly: as a citizen reporting threats against children, the targeting of a disabled woman, planted GPS data, and police stalking — if he doesn't investigate these, who do I take them to? His answer, twice on the same call, was: the police — the police of jurisdiction, with the caveat that no single police service would deal with all of it. That is the circularity documented throughout this record: the misconduct being reported is the police refusing to take the report. Also on that recording, I recount the Welke house visit — her berating me until the accompanying officer put his hand on her shoulder and told her to stop, and her response upon hearing the GPS evidence: "maybe you're not supposed to know." Stevens confirms on the same call that he had read the CRCC submissions, including the account of the night my mother died — meaning none of it can later be claimed as unknown to the investigation.

Transcripts of Calls with Sgt Stevens:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-09-27_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/2w6ks989)

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-12-12_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/4pmrav5t)

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-12-13_Transcript_Call_To_RCMP_Seargent_Stevens_CRCC.html (https://tinyurl.com/5drau9jd)

Corporal Attewell attended my home on August 22, 2024 over a Facebook post about Jessica Welke and laughed at the sexual assault and other abuse reported. On the September 13, 2024 recordings he confirms the post — not the assault — was the reason for his visit, and guarantees that "the Civilian Review Board... would have created a report every time someone calls." The CRCC's own documented conduct — Carole, David, and Paul, across three years — proves that guarantee false. When pressed again on the sexual assault, he states, "Well, I'm pretty confident in our members' abilities to investigate things, but I'll have a look" — and never does. There was no case and he knew this, but the statement shows his explicit trust in RCMP members, and his explicit presumption against me, the victim. He later claimed he tried to call me back; he did not — I have the phone records. He then claimed I did pick up when he called. I live in Ecum Secum, where there is effectively no cellular service, a fact known to every officer who has attended my residence, including him.

At this stage, you will also see calls with the CRCC where they state "Carole wouldn't do that," and where David himself did not record the sexual assault and abuse. Instead, they stated they had requested that their Complaints Directorate have Trevor Allen contact me. The CRCC knows he never did — a clear pattern of abuse by the RCMP. When I escalated the matter showing this had occurred, the CRCC knew they had a serious issue on their hands and branched the case to hide their misconduct and blame the complainant. This abusive process would then be exploited by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen on June 1, 2025.

On February 14 and February 21, 2025, after I called dispatch requesting a case number for a violent sexual assault — and stated on that call my concern that police retaliation might follow — Constables Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, and Zachary Lechene arrived at my door with the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team as a buffer instead of a case number. On the recording, Pye asks "Who are your abusers?" — after years of documented contact with her own detachment — and characterizes me as uncooperative seconds after being told I had given statements to fourteen officers across this record and posted every piece of evidence publicly. Lechene, asked directly whether officers would be standing at my door at all if a case number had simply been issued, answers: "Not sure." Both visits ended with the officers observed in their vehicles discussing how the incident would be recorded. No case was opened. The sexual assault was not documented.

Inspector Cory Bushell and Sergeant Trevor Allen later named Stevens a conflict of interest in their own report — and then relied on his record as though the conflict changed nothing.

On February 27, 2025, Shelly Mews of the Special Victims Unit contacted me under case 2025-21595, contact 902-220-2013. She attempted to arrange that I sit in a room with Attewell — the officer whose conduct I was reporting — in Musquodoboit Harbour, and took on the same tone about contacting me. It was clear she was leaning on his fabricated records, along with the Sheet Harbour detachment's. Given this involved multiple officers covering up sexual abuse and retaliation, I made it clear I wanted the case escalated to Commissioners Mike Duheme and Dennis Daley, as I explicitly and repeatedly requested. I left a voicemail requesting someone contact me to verify Shelly Mews was in fact an RCMP officer and that a case was in fact actually open. I would be contacted by someone named Curt Wallace, who left three voicemails in the same day while I was away. They made no mention of Shelly Mews, never listed a case number, and provided no contact information. Here are recordings of his voicemails:
https://youtu.be/ENnW9Z-K1rw

Effectively, nothing allowing you to identify them as any police member, or to contact them back — consistent with RCMP behaviour of falsely claiming they weren't contacted back. I immediately called Shelly Mews and left voice messages; nothing was returned. Later, when contacted by Cpl. Joseph Fraser (RCMP) on June 1, 2026, he would advise: "Sgt Curt Wallace is with HRP and thus, I cannot investigation his conduct" [sic].

Shelly Mews created a fork. She knew Wallace could not be investigated by the RCMP and would cause serious confusion — confusion the RCMP would blame me for — which is reasonably why Curt Wallace never left contact information. This is how officers fabricate false records and abuse the process, and it is consistent with Attewell's false claims about trying to contact me, which Shelly Mews tried to rely on.

From that period onward, I did my season videos while calling Shelly Mews. In one instance her voicemail box filled with my recorded evidence, and was then cleared — received, and deleted:
https://youtu.be/GurTUG-7eoU

Without the audio recordings, the record would suggest I was unresponsive, while she could claim the messages were too long, too short, or whatever fit a narrative of Shelly Mews simply being a victim. As of June 10, 2026 — approximately 454 days — nobody has contacted me regarding 2025-21595. My aunt contacted the RCMP/HRP out of concern; they then contacted me and left a voicemail advising they were still waiting for a statement from me and that the case was still assigned to Shelly Mews. So if Shelly Mews had a problem with me, why not reassign the case? Why not sincerely try to contact me? It is reasonable to conclude she knew about her misconduct, and keeping the case allows her to bias whichever officer it eventually gets assigned to.

That is precisely how this pattern operates. And after more than 800 days, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen opened the investigation on June 1, 2025 and closed it on June 4, 2025 — four days, no contact with me, no written statement from any officer, including Welke. They fabricated an entire record, never recorded the website or the evidence submitted, and never once referenced the sexual assault — yet it is listed directly in CRCC correspondence to the RCMP, very clearly, on September 6, 2023, was told to Carole directly, was known to the multiple RCMP members who attended my house regarding the sexual assault, and was reported to NSHA and CPSNS from the start in all complaints — reported within 12 hours of it occurring on August 2, 2022, on an email thread to dozens of media outlets, lawyers, government officials, and the RCMP and HRP directly. They acknowledged that their response was well outside their mandated timeline, fabricated records that make no sense, and just closed the case. This is after the CRCC themselves explicitly stated they had requested their Complaints Directorate have Trevor Allen contact me.

Set the input record against the output record. Stevens is on tape receiving the GPS question, acknowledging the denied-case allegation — "you tried to open the case and... you were denied that... it's something that I would look into" — recording the requested resolutions, and committing to "paint the full picture" up the chain. The four-day closure contains none of it: no GPS question, no denied-case finding, no sexual assault, no contact with the complainant. Between what Stevens is recorded receiving and what Bushell and Allen produced, the information vanished at one of exactly three points — Stevens's write-up, Bushell and Allen's review, or the CRCC's handling of the file. All three belong to them. The recordings mean the disappearance is not a matter of my word; it is a measurable gap between a documented input and a documented output.

A detailed rebuttal was submitted to the CRCC on July 9, 2025:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html (https://tinyurl.com/uawbhwr8)

Video Review of the Document:

https://youtu.be/EkbkumKe-Hs

Detailed evidence was then submitted to the CRCC, along with a review request for 2023-1031. Information was provided to the CRCC for 2024-005807. Paul, the Manager, did not respond until February 10, 2026 — two days before the CRCC Review's 120-business-day service standard would have been exceeded for 2023-1031. At this stage, the CRCC was in a lot of trouble for allowing this to occur. Obviously, the CRCC had made serious mistakes with 2023-1031, and the RCMP exploited those mistakes. The CRCC branched to 2024-005807 to try to cover this up and obscure the issue — because if 2024-005807 then showed critical issues with 2023-1031, it would show definitively that the CRCC caused serious problems, consistent with my submissions. So Paul and the CRCC waited until they knew they could use 2023-1031 to retaliate and claim the CRCC had done some kind of review — which is why the response came two days before the service standard expired. In total, it was about nine months, or 276 days, without a response: clearly excessive. Paul then reprimanded me for asking for updates, even though he knew a violent sexual assault had been reported repeatedly, and that the RCMP officers — whom the CRCC themselves had requested the Complaints Directorate have contact me — never did, and fabricated a false report. He and the CRCC knew they could use the fabricated record to retaliate; if not, they would have to admit fault for what they did. And so Paul used that opportunity to fabricate an internal record in which the CRCC were somehow the victims of receiving detailed evidence, to justify their inaction.

Detailed submissions were then made to the CRCC, along with requests to add the additional officers.

In my submission to the CRCC, you will see that complaints were lodged against fifteen different officers: Jessica Welke, Justin Hall, Chad Sanford, Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, Zachary Lechene, Sergeant Stevens, Corporal Attewell, Shelly Mews, Curt Wallace, Cory Bushell, Trevor Allen, Mike Duheme, Dennis Daley, and Brenda Lucki.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-16_CRCC%20Detailed%20submission%20regarding%20mutiple%20officers.html (https://tinyurl.com/yuafunmy)

On June 1, 2026, I was contacted by Cpl. Joseph Fraser, who requested details regarding the officers. However, in his response to me, he listed only the following: Cst. Matthews, Sgt. Attewell, Insp. Bushell, Ret. Sgt. Allen, Sgt. Stevens, Sgt. Mews, Cpl. Hall, Cpl. Sanford, and Cpl. Welke. The list omits Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, and Zachary Lechene entirely, while also omitting their senior commanders: Mike Duheme, Dennis Daley, and Brenda Lucki.

The CRCC removed the officers for whom there are direct audio recordings of them discussing the sexual assault and using Jessica Welke's name directly. These officers were requested to investigate the sexual assault and abuse, knew Jessica Welke was being accused of covering it up, and never opened cases themselves. Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen confirmed this: in their reports, they only looked at open cases with the Sheet Harbour detachment and never mentioned the sexual assault — yet those officers are on video recording directly speaking about it and retaliating. Those officers were also aware of the person saying "GOOD" when the abuse was reported — reasonably one of those officers themselves.

While they also removed Mike Duheme and Dennis Daley, while they have delivery confirmations of emails delivered to their addresses, as well as assistants that were not responded to, inline with the reported behaviour.

https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2026-03-23_Delivery%20confirmation%20from%20Dennis%20Daley%20states%20he%20is%20retiring.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yvpjdkfk)

Meanwhile, the list includes "Cst. Matthews" — with an assigned allegation of "Improper Arrest." Neither exists in my complaint. The full submission is public and searchable: the name Matthews appears nowhere in it, and it contains no allegation of improper arrest against any RCMP member — the false arrest documented in this record is attributed to HRP. A misread name cannot generate a matching allegation. This entry therefore did not originate from my intake: it originated either from invention or from another complainant's file — and either origin is the CRCC's to explain. It also directly contradicts Fraser's own written answer that the determinations were made "based on your intakes." As of this writing, no explanation has been offered. Verify it yourself: the submission is linked above — search it for "Matthews."

A detailed response was then sent to Cpl. Joseph Fraser on June 30, 2026, asking about the discrepancies, along with the basic questions listed below.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-06-30_RCMP_CRCC_Joseph_Fraser_Response_To_2026-06-01_Questions_.html (https://tinyurl.com/4knrexdf)

Joseph Fraser responded on July 6, 2026:

Did you remove the officers from the complaint, or did the CRCC? I'd ask that you please explain this in detail.
— "CRCC provided me with the complaints and subject members that they are accepting. Nothing further to explain there. They are the reviewing body and based on your intakes, they make the determination."
Did you choose the provisions listed against each officer in your emails to me, or did the CRCC?
— "I chose the allegations as each subject officer requires a specific allegation assigned to them. What I chose, was the most fitting on our list of allegations."
Did the CRCC advise you of the CSIS case number?
— "I was provided your intake and your 1000 page support docs."
As a Canadian citizen, and you as an RCMP officer, I have reported sexual assault, the planting of GPS evidence, threats against children, fabricated records, and direct threats, supported by audio recordings and detailed technical records. These issues remain unresolved and uninvestigated, and I understand that falls outside the scope of what you are investigating. Can you please advise me as to which police service I should be reporting this abuse to, and provide me with their contact number.
— "Where did the sexual assault take place? The police of jurisdiction will depend on this. Once I receive this information, I will be able to point you in the right direction."
To add the officers clearly and intentionally omitted by the CRCC, who do you recommend I contact to have them added to this investigation?
— "You would have to contact the CRCC directly through the e-mail that you have. You would quote your current intake number that was provided."

As you can see, he confirms the CRCC did in fact remove the officers — the very officers whose inclusion would have shown that the CRCC caused serious issues with both ongoing cases — and advises contacting the CRCC to have this clarified. That much is basic and makes sense. But the rest shows you something very specific about how this record was used. He cites the volume of the submissions rather than answering basic questions. He states that he is the one who chose the provisions used in assessing the officers' conduct. When asked the point-blank question of whether the CRCC provided him with the CSIS number, he dodges — implying it was buried and he didn't see it — when CSIS clearly considered the national security issues reported serious enough to generate a case number. That alone tells you the RCMP should have taken those issues and deferred the case appropriately.

The full list of provisions Fraser assigned — which he confirmed in writing were his own choices — is published here:

https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-06-01_Provisions_And_email_From_Cpl_Joseph_Fraser.html (https://tinyurl.com/33t39ham)

Read what it contains and what it omits. Failing to investigate the sexual assault is formally charged against four members: Welke, Sanford, Hall, and Mews. Failing to return calls is charged against Welke, Mews, and Attewell — allegations that track this record's phone logs and recordings precisely, down to Attewell's "Improper Attitude — by laughing at you," which is on the September 13, 2024 tape. The intake was therefore read closely enough to extract recorded specifics. And yet: no provision anywhere addresses the GPS manipulation, the recorded threats, the "GOOD" response, the fabricated records, or the retaliation — the core of the complaint. Attewell carries no provision for failing to investigate the sexual assault, despite being recorded saying "I'll have a look" and never doing so. Stevens, Allen, and Bushell receive only the unspecified "Public Complaint Process." A reading careful enough to charge laughter cannot have missed the GPS question. What was included measures how deliberate the exclusions were.

Note also what this provisions list does to the RCMP's own prior review. In June 2025, Bushell and Allen closed their investigation in four days without once referencing the sexual assault. In 2026, Fraser — working from the same complainant and the same record — formally assigned "failing to investigate sexual assault" to four RCMP members. Both documents are RCMP work product. If the allegation was derivable from the record in 2026, it was in the record in 2025. Either the four-day closure did not read the file, or it read the file and omitted the allegation. There is no third option, and both belong to the RCMP.

When asked who to take these issues to — which included rape calls, the killing of a dog, GPS data being planted, threats against children, fabricated records, retaliation by the RCMP, and sexual assault, as the shortlist — he leaves out all of those issues and responds only about the sexual assault, deferring on jurisdiction rather than answering the question asked. The provisions he assigned follow the same contour: recorded specifics charged where they implicate least, the core allegations charged against no one. The CRCC completed the pattern by removing from the complaint the officers who are on recordings directly discussing the sexual assault and Jessica Welke — Pye, Charant, and Lechene — so those recordings can never be put to a subject member on the record, along with the senior commanders: Duheme, Daley, and Lucki.

None of this is merely administrative. The RCMP Act imposes a duty on every member to ensure misconduct is not concealed (section 36.2(e)) and makes investigation of Code of Conduct contraventions mandatory, not discretionary (section 40(1) — "shall"). The Code of Conduct requires every member present to report contraventions (section 8.3). The good-faith immunity protecting CRCC staff (section 45.5) does not survive a documented pattern of non-recording, misrepresentation, and dismissal without assessment. And the Supreme Court's test for misfeasance in public office — Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, a case about police officers deliberately failing their statutory duties — applies directly. These recordings, phone records, and analytics exist independently of my account. The factual record can be verified by anyone. The question — stated to the CRCC in the submission itself — is whether the institutions responsible for that verification are willing to do so.

CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service)

Detailed Index

Late 2021, I would contact CSIS regarding the core issue and make myself available. I would call them regarding what would become the Ukraine War; I asked them to run the biggest test they've run in 70 years.

August 2, 2022, I would walk to CSIS at 1505 Barrington St, Halifax, NS B3J 3Y6, and drop off additional information in a wallet tin.

January 29, 2023, the morning my mother passed and Premier Tim Houston showed up at the hospital, neighbours reported lights in my house. Meanwhile, another family associate was at a nearby Tim Hortons and stated someone came in talking about being from CSIS and then just walked out.

March 13, 2023, I would walk to CSIS and drop off additional information before walking to HRP to file my Professional Standards complaint against the HRP officers who falsely arrested me August 2, 2022, along with Dan Kinsella.

July 31, 2023, I released a video directed at David Vigneault, then Director of CSIS:
https://youtu.be/C7OpBEBV_vg

June 30, 2024, I would release a new version of TWNN with tagging and other advanced features. I would state to friends and family that we would have a response within 4 days; 4 days later, on July 4, 2024, then-Director of CSIS David Vigneault would resign.

February 12, 2025, I would make a video directed to Daniel Rogers, Director of CSIS, asking him to question Sam Altman on AI building nuclear weapons.
https://youtu.be/f4oJj3mpTY8

February 21, 2025, I would call CSIS. They would open a case, Attachment5566, and ask me to make a more detailed submission to Attachment5566@smtp.gc.ca. A detailed submission was made February 22, 2025. Going forward, this address was added to all communication:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2025-02-22_Emailed_CSIS_As_Requested_Under_Attachment5566.html (https://tinyurl.com/mrabp5mk)

January 7, 2026, I would release a video that was completed January 6, 2026. This gave Daniel Rogers, and only Daniel Rogers, rights to access all data regarding www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, including analytics.
https://youtu.be/JzMIxrZlHNc

By narrowing down the email recipients, especially in the email to Joseph Fraser, it is most likely the analytic spikes are being caused by CSIS, W5, CBC, or the RCMP. Most reasonably, CSIS.

As of July 13, 2026, I am currently in the process of setting up a direct meeting with Daniel Rogers.

HRP Professional Standards / HRP (Halifax Regional Police)

Detailed Index

The HRP record runs from the March 27, 2019 Wortley Report to the present, and centres on the false arrest of August 2, 2022 and the Professional Standards process that followed.

The background begins with the Wortley Report exposing street checks and systemic racism within HRP. On April 18, 2019 — eight days after my April 10, 2019 complaint to Irving Shipbuilding — Interim Chief Robin McNeil stated it would be "disingenuous" to apologize for street checks, and Superintendent Jim Perrin, then Commander of the Criminal Investigation Unit, acknowledged "bias" but would not apologize. On May 27, 2019, my wallet was taken from my car and surfaced in HRP custody; when I retrieved it on June 5, 2019, HRP stated the file was part of something "ongoing" — a status capable of silently blocking security clearance. In November 2019, Jim Perrin transferred to J.D. Irving as Physical Security Manager, in the same 24-hour window as Dan Kinsella's street-check apology announcement and the Torstar Halifax closure. Perrin then ran Irving Shipbuilding's investigation of my complaint. The EMIC contracts began July 5, 2019 — the day Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief. A June 2022 FOI request to HRP about the wallet came back locked "for someone else's privacy" on June 23, 2022 — the day Irving Shipbuilding CEO Kevin Mooney stepped down.

On August 2, 2022, I attended HRP headquarters to file a complaint against Chief Dan Kinsella, presenting TWNN-ALPHA — 400+ chronologically ordered, hyperlinked data points, with delivery confirmations showing it had sat in HRP's mailbox since July 11, 2022. The attending officers acknowledged on the record that "we as police do not investigate other officers." Sgt. Dooks told me paperwork was being retrieved so I could file — then returned and arrested me under s. 14 of the IPTA. HRP's own report confirms the arrest was "noneventful without any notable resistance or use of force." I was held in handcuffs more than ten hours, denied a lawyer on five occasions, and delivered to NSHA in custody — where I was sexually assaulted and false records were produced (detailed in the NSHA/CPSNS section). My bookbag, containing my wallet, health card, and banking information, was transported to Mount Hope with another patient before I saw a doctor — confirmed by Mount Hope's internal note of August 3, 2022. HRP cannot say, to this day, which officer removed my handcuffs.

On November 2, 2022, HRP members held a historic no-confidence vote in Chief Kinsella: 84% voted, 96.6% no confidence. During the same period, the EMIC contracts were deleted from the federal disclosure site — reported to dozens of parties October 26 and November 6, 2022 — and later restored. On March 13, 2023, after ample warning, I walked to CSIS and then HRP and filed my Professional Standards complaint (Form 5) without incident; hours later, the RCMP apprehended me under the IPTA, and NSHA staff alleged unspecified "threats" no one could produce. On September 6, 2023, Kinsella announced his retirement, effective September 15 — a decision that, assuming standard two weeks' notice, dates to the same period the fabricated NSHA trespass notice of August 22, 2023 was generated.

The Professional Standards file (PC-23-0049), handled by Sgt. Jonathan Jefferies, Insp. Ron Legere, and Commissioner Patrick H. Curran, is documented stage by stage in the April 7, 2026 detailed complaint. The arresting officers were removed from a complaint about a false arrest without explanation — three written requests asking why (April 18, 2023, resent twice) were never answered, and no statements were ever taken from them. TWNN-ALPHA was omitted from the investigative record by name. Legere's Form 11 of July 7, 2023 introduced fabricated claims. Curran misstated the Form 5 filing date, reframed the torture allegation as exclusively medical, denied any "evidence or allegation" of HRP involvement in the bookbag transfer despite the allegation appearing in the title of the April 3, 2023 submission, and closed the file on April 17, 2024 with a single sentence in response to a detailed rebuttal. His own dismissal concedes the investigation could not identify which officer removed my handcuffs. The matter has been raised with CSIS under Attachment5566 and referred to the RCMP and the Crown Prosecutor of Nova Scotia with a request for criminal investigation of Curran, Legere, and Jefferies.

Full sections: detailed events (Perrin/McNeil/Kinsella), the false arrest of August 2, 2022, the continued retaliation, and the PC-23-0049 review, with all supporting documents:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-07_Detailed_Complaint_HRP_Professional_Standards.html
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-04-03_HRP_Professional_Standards_PC-23-0049_Full_Correspondence_Thread_Scott_Jewers_Jonathan_Jefferies_Patrick_Curran_Ron_Legere.html

CRCC (The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP)

Detailed Index

Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-13_CRCC_Detailed_Review_and_Behavioral_Analysis.html (https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn)

CRCC / RCMP — The Oversight Body That Built the Record It Needed, Files 2023-1031 and R2024-005807

When the police are the subject of the complaint, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission is supposed to be the mechanism that works. This section documents what actually happened when I brought the CRCC a reported sexual assault, fabricated institutional records, GPS evidence planted on my phone, and three years of documented RCMP conduct — and how the CRCC's own intake record became the instrument by which none of it was ever investigated.

It begins with the intake. On March 27, 2023, I explained the full context to CRCC intake officer Carole — the reported sexual assault of August 3, 2022 at Mount Hope Hospital, the false arrest of August 2, 2022, the break and enter with multiple witnesses, the GPS manipulation to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, RCMP engagement dating back to September 2021, and Premier Tim Houston's presence at the hospital the morning my mother passed away, January 29, 2023. Her intake record of April 12, 2023 omitted the sexual assault entirely, omitted The Wolf and the Neural Network – ALPHA by name, inverted my stated position — recording that I felt police "had no reason to respond" to NSHA when my complaint was explicitly about leadership-level decisions and not frontline officers — collapsed four separate RCMP attendances of August 16, August 17, November 24, and December 21, 2022 into composite entries, and anchored the entire file to the March 13, 2023 IPTA apprehension, creating a false origin point through which every substantive allegation could be reframed as a mental-health matter. That record became the baseline for every actor who followed. Her omissions became their baseline. Her framing became their framework.

What the record could not erase is on audio. On May 24, 2023, I called Corporal Jessica Welke of the Sheet Harbour RCMP, with my aunt present, and formally requested to press charges regarding the March 13, 2023 false arrest. The call was recorded in full, posted publicly, and provided to the CRCC and to Sergeant Jeff Stevens. At the moment I stated that I had been told that if I even mentioned J.D. Irving I would be arrested and pumped full of drugs, an unidentified voice is audibly heard in the background responding "GOOD" — at timestamp 6:17 of the recording. Welke committed to calling back the following Monday. She never did. Three days after I publicly flagged the recording, on May 27, 2023, the Mobile Mental Health Crisis Team contacted me. Welke's own recorded words show she was attempting to arrange a meeting with her superiors about these issues and that nobody was getting back to her:

Transcript: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2023-05-24_Transcript_Of_Call_Jessica_RCMP_Sheet_Harbour_May_24_2023_3_16pm.html (https://tinyurl.com/3jmabkzp)
Audio and video: https://youtu.be/RQ9PlsVuZiI

The reporting was consistent, formal, and confirmed received. The CRCC's own transmission records show detailed submissions — including the sexual assault — formally sent to the RCMP on May 25, 2023, June 22, 2023, September 6, 2023, December 19, 2023, April 3, 2024, and April 11, 2024, and the CRCC's own September 6, 2023 response acknowledges the sexual assault in writing. Sergeant Stevens, across recorded calls of September 25, September 27, December 12, and December 13, 2023, documented on audio the GPS data, possible interference with federal investigations, and the threats toward children and a disabled woman, and stated he was forwarding them to the appropriate authorities.

When CRCC agent David called on August 16, 2024, I described the sexual assault again in detail and asked why no one had followed up on Carole's omissions. His recorded answer was "Carole wouldn't do that." He then repeated her conduct exactly — no documentation of the assault, and the file closed on October 7, 2024, after I had re-particularized everything in writing on September 23, 2024.

Then came the fragmentation. On October 30, 2024, CRCC Complaint Intake Manager Paul confirmed in writing that he had reviewed all prior submissions and issued five pages of questions — including Question 3, which directly addressed the sexual assault. On May 10, 2025, I delivered a 51-page, evidence-based response answering every question he posed: the date, the location, the full reporting chain, and the specific retaliation that followed. He confirmed receipt the same day. He then did not respond for over eight months — until February 10, 2026, two days before the CRCC Review's 120-business-day service standard would have been breached. In between, rather than correcting file 2023-1031, he opened a separate file, R2024-005807, for the substantive allegations — structurally severing the evidence from the file that would decide the outcome. When I submitted my detailed video rebuttal of July 9, 2025, running 83 minutes and 48 seconds, a 60-minute video limit was produced only after the fact — despite my explicit prior request for submission standards — creating a retroactive basis to exclude the evidence that contradicted the record. And through all of it, the CRCC confirmed there is no sitting Chairperson: both files sit in limbo, with no oversight of any of it.

The RCMP executed on the record it was handed. After the case had been open more than 800 days, Inspector Cory Bushell, Sergeant Trevor Allen, and Ignatius Hall opened the investigation on June 1, 2025 and closed it on June 4, 2025 — four days — without ever contacting me. Their Final Report of June 6, 2025 relied exclusively on the IPTA framing introduced on April 12, 2023, used Carole's incorrect dates and quotes, took no written statement from Jessica Welke despite her involvement dating to August 17, 2022, never referenced the May 10, 2025 submission, never addressed the "GOOD" recording, cited Sergeant Stevens while omitting everything Stevens had documented on audio, and attributed to me a statement about the May 24, 2023 call that the public recording proves was never made. A report that ignores a provided recording and inserts a characterization the recording contradicts is not an incomplete report. It is an inaccurate one. My full written and video rebuttal:

July 9, 2025 — Detailed Rebuttal to RCMP: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html (https://tinyurl.com/bde4y9hb)

And here is the contradiction the CRCC cannot resolve. On October 30, 2024, Paul's own questions — drawn from his confirmed review of file 2023-1031 — directly addressed the sexual assault, the Premier's presence at the hospital, and the threats. On April 8, 2026, the CRCC Review stated in writing that file 2023-1031 did not include the sexual assault, election interference, or national security concerns. Both positions rest on the same record. Both cannot be true. One of them is false — and the transmission records, the September 6, 2023 acknowledgment, and Paul's own question list establish which.

The full correspondence record is preserved in sequence:

All CRCC interactions: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/All%20CRCC%20Follow%20ups.html (https://tinyurl.com/369htxj7)
RCMP correspondence: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/RCMP_Correspondence.html (https://tinyurl.com/mrsvpd84)

As it stands on April 13, 2026: 802 days of RCMP silence between March 27, 2023 and June 6, 2025 before a four-day investigation closed the file; over 1,000 days open at the CRCC; an eight-month silence broken two days before a service-standard breach; a reported sexual assault that has never been investigated by any institution at any level; and a review process with no Chairperson to answer to. This matter has been referred to the RCMP with a request for criminal investigation of CRCC conduct, to CSIS under Attachment5566 with a request for security-clearance review, to NSIRA and the Government of Canada with a request for immediate intervention, and to media across Canada with full ATIP access offered. The intake record was constructed on April 12, 2023. Everything since has been built on it — which is precisely why it was never corrected.

OIPC (Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia)

Detailed Index

Full section: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/OIPC_Event_Summary.html (https://tinyurl.com/msu9225z)

The OIPC record spans February 28, 2020 to the present. It begins with the jurisdictional question: on February 28, 2020, OIPC Investigator Julie Young advised that the office had no jurisdiction over Irving Shipbuilding or PIPEDA, directing the matter to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada — a position she confirmed in writing on December 6, 2022.

The provincial file arises from August 2–3, 2022, when, following a false arrest by HRP, my bookbag — containing my wallet, health card, driver's licence, banking cards, and cash — was transported to Mount Hope and delivered to another patient. Mount Hope's own internal note of August 3, 2022 records the error, and the patient told me he and two HRP officers had gone through the bag. NSHA Privacy Director Karen Hornberger's May 25, 2023 response characterized the breach as a matter of "patient belongings," closed the case without investigation, and deferred me to the OIPC. On May 30, 2023, NSHA File 2023-074 became OIPC File 23-00201. In parallel, the OIPC declined (March 29 and April 3, 2023) to answer whether patients may record their own medical interactions — a right nothing in PHIA restricts and s. 184(2)(a) of the Criminal Code expressly protects. A February 22, 2024 letter to then-Commissioner Tricia Ralph, with the complete documentary record, went unanswered while File 23-00201 sat in a multi-year backlog documented by the OIPC's own 2023-2024 Annual Report.

On July 11, 2024, Julie Young provided the OIPC's criteria for expediting a file; I submitted the request on the July 25, 2024 deadline, engaging every criterion point by point. On August 27, 2024, Senior Investigator Jason Mighton denied it in a single line — "these criteria have not been met" — with no finding on any individual criterion. Effective November 1, 2025, the OIPC eliminated applicant expedite requests entirely.

On July 16, 2025, following the OIPC's own posted instructions, I delivered five privacy complaint forms — GPS/9330 Highway #7, the missing ESDC mail, NSHA trespass and identity theft, Curran/Legere/Jefferies disclosures, and Valent Legal — to the office's mail slot. On August 13, 2025, the OIPC responded not with an investigation but with an "Unreasonable Behaviour Policy Written Notice": unsigned, copied to Corporate Security and the Department of Justice, declaring future communications would be unread, unanswered, and unretained. The full section documents that each of the notice's grounds fails on its own text — the "78-page package" was thirty-five pages of the OIPC's own form plus attachments the form itself mandates; the email-volume finding rests on a quantity the office admits it stopped measuring in May 2023; the five complaints were jurisdictionally sound, with components outside the OIPC's mandate already filed in their correct venues (CRCC 2023-1031/R2024-005807; OPC PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, P-2025-00180; HRP Professional Standards; CPSNS); the alleged "threat" was a promise of a permanent public record; and the "covert" recording was disclosed in writing and lawful under s. 184(2)(a). The notice's characterization of my conduct was distributed to the DOJ without the case numbers — RCMP 2025-21595 and CSIS Attachment5566 — that would have allowed anyone to verify it.

The net effect of the OIPC record: a documented PHI breach unaddressed since 2022, an expedite process engaged and then abolished, five complaints rejected without differentiation or referral, and reported abuse answered with a conduct finding against the person reporting it.

OPC / ESDC — The Privacy Regulator That Closed the File Before the Call, Files PIPEDA-040565, PIPEDA-045577, PA-070308, and P-2025-00180

Detailed Index

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is the body a Canadian is supposed to turn to when their personal information is weaponized. This section documents six years of doing exactly that — and what the OPC's and ESDC's own correspondence records show happened each time. The full thread is preserved in sequence:
Full correspondence: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/OPC_ESDC_Correspondence.html (https://tinyurl.com/3d5etpmr)

It begins during the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding. On February 19, 2020, I made my first OPC inquiry — reference PRIVINFO-139143 — regarding my rights to my own HR record, the January 27, 2020 meeting recording, and the access logs. On February 28, 2020, I escalated to the Canadian Privacy Commissioner under PRIVINFO-139757.

This was against a wall Irving's Vice President of Human Resources, Jim Rennie, had already built. On February 25, 2020, Rennie confirmed in writing that Irving had "reviewed all of the e-mail submissions" I had sent, and concluded "there was no instance of harassment directed towards you," adding that I had "not provided any credible evidence of fraud nor of a breach of the Canadian Criminal Code" — this despite having been given the Jim Perrin security review (January 20, 2020) and the Jodi Posavad security review (January 31, 2020), which identified the Royal Military College IP address 216.208.235.222, the technical exploits, the February 21, 2020 PIPEDA request, and the deletion of information from the job postings raised on February 14, 2020. When I sought my own HR record, Rennie stated "there is no legal requirement in Nova Scotia to provide this information," and closed by stating Irving "want[ed] to reiterate that we have investigated your complaint and no further action will be taken," and that he and Irving Shipbuilding "will not be responding to further correspondence." On March 5, 2020, I emailed Rennie and J.D. Irving again, requesting clarification on their privacy policy and PIPEDA applicability; Rennie refused to clarify and reiterated that Irving Shipbuilding would no longer be in contact.

On March 4, 2020, Irving's Privacy Officer replied that "Irving Shipbuilding is a provincially regulated business. Thank you." — and the jurisdictional shell game was complete. On April 29, 2020, I filed the labour complaint with ESDC; on June 25, 2020, the formal PIPEDA inquiry; and on September 25, 2020, the full PIPEDA submission under file PIPEDA-040565. On October 20, 2020, in recorded calls, the OPC's own manager — insisting the matter wasn't federally regulated while conceding the Canada Labour Code provisions — told me "oh, you might get them there."

When I asked, by phone, for the legal authority behind the claimed exemption, Patrick of the OPC told me it was covered by an "Executive order," which I understood to mean an Order in Council. This was said verbally, on that call; on repeated follow-up, no order was ever identified or produced, and no such instrument can be found in the public record. If an Order in Council genuinely exempts Irving Shipbuilding from federal privacy jurisdiction, it has a date and a PC number, and both are discoverable — yet none has ever been named.

Here is the inconsistency the record cannot reconcile. On February 25, 2020, Rennie — the company's own VP of Human Resources, actively defending against my complaint — grounded Irving's refusal in provincial regulation, matching the Privacy Officer's March 4, 2020 line that "Irving Shipbuilding is a provincially regulated business." Neither ever cited an Order in Council or any federal exemption. Yet on October 20, 2020, the OPC's Patrick told me by phone that the matter was covered by an "Executive order." If such an instrument existed, it would be the single most decisive thing Irving's HR head could have named on February 25 to end the complaint outright — and he did not name it, because Irving's position was "provincially regulated," not "federally exempted." The two explanations cannot both be true: either Irving is provincially regulated (Rennie and the Privacy Officer, February–March 2020, no Order in Council involved), or it is federally exempted by an Order in Council (Patrick, OPC, October 2020, never produced). A real exemption is known to the party relying on it. This one changed depending on who was asked, and on what date — and vanished when asked to be produced.

The refusals were not occasional — they were systematic, and they are tallied by date and timestamp. The OPC rejected at least six written requests (June 25, September 26, October 29, November 30, 2020; March 10 and March 23, 2021) to reconcile its own published position — that businesses operating in Canada and handling personal information across provincial or national borders are subject to PIPEDA regardless of where they are based — with the facts of a New Brunswick-registered company operating in Nova Scotia, exchanging data with its parent, international partners, and the Government of Canada. The OPC rejected at least seven written requests to clarify the phrase "without restricting the generality of the foregoing" in the federal-undertaking definition — the exact words PIPEDA omits and the Canada Labour Code contains. ESDC rejected at least eight written requests to define "the day on which the subject-matter of the complaint arose," and at least five more to clarify basic date ranges. Twenty-six written requests, minimum, across two federal bodies, all refused — while Canada's national shipbuilder, building warships under Provision 91(7) of the Constitution Act in the largest ship-construction building in North America, was held to be beyond federal privacy jurisdiction.

On March 19, 2021, the OPC issued its position under PIPEDA-040565: Irving Shipbuilding is not a federal work, undertaking, or business, and contracting with the federal government to build ships does not, by itself, make it one. The full provision-by-provision review that position never answered — PIPEDA against the Canada Labour Code, the Constitution Act, and the Oceans Act — was provided to the OPC, ESDC, privacy lawyer David Fraser, and the main email thread on August 5, 2020, and stands for anyone to evaluate:
PIPEDA applicability review: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-08-05_JDIrving-OPC-ESDC-Government-Stephen%20McNiel-David%20Fraser_OPC%20and%20ESDC%20-%20PIPEDA%20Review%20Image%20-%20Copy.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/ymvtm34v)

And the ESDC letter regarding the jurisprudence decision on the OPC and PIPEDA — dated September 15, 2020 — is the physical mail that went missing from my mailbox, on the same date the second EMIC contract commenced.

The OPC cannot claim it lacked notice of what followed. My email of August 2, 2022 — the day of the false arrest — drew auto-replies from Commissioner Daniel Therrien's own office at 1:36 PM. On August 31, 2023, at 10:59 PM, I submitted the detailed evidentiary response on file PIPEDA-045577, requesting it be forwarded directly to Commissioner Philippe Dufresne: the wallet, the GPS set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, both EMIC contracts matching the two residences, the military IP address, the IMSI catcher, the Burchell's LP and Valent Legal hacking incidents, the Google Analytics spikes, the EMIC contracts deleted from the government website and restored only after I cited the Wayback Machine, and the OPC's own 2020 conduct — stating plainly that this was roughly 20% of the evidence, and asking that someone call me. The OPC's automated acknowledgment arrived at 11:00 PM, one minute later. Follow-ups on September 13, September 27, October 5, and October 19, 2023, and replies through May 3, 2024, produced no substantive engagement with a single enumerated event. Nobody ever called.

On May 15, 2025, I submitted a 51-page complaint — twelve numbered privacy failures, from the May 27, 2019 wallet theft to the January 15, 2024 CPSNS disclosure of my confidential medical information to Cox & Palmer — to the OPC and more than 77 other recipients. What happened on June 4, 2025 is documented minute by minute in the OPC's own words. At 12:34 PM, Senior Advisor Brad Carrier closed file PA-070308 at the intake stage by email, citing section 29 of the Privacy Act, asserting that none of the issues raised fell within it — without addressing any of the twelve points, without one word about CSIS despite the national security content, and signing off "Take care" on a file containing allegations of torture and sexual assault. Point 12 alone — a regulator disclosing my medical information to a conflicted law firm — is a disclosure-of-personal-information matter on its face, squarely within section 29. At 1:12 PM, I returned his call. The recording captures him eating lunch while I described the sexual assault and the national security breaches, stating "we don't initiate investigations," confirming "I'm having a bite of something, yeah," and answering my request for escalation with: "I don't have a manager, Scott." At 1:27 PM, I formally requested escalation to Commissioner Philippe Dufresne. At 1:37 PM, Carrier emailed that he had "already brought this matter... to a manager." Both statements cannot be true. Either he has no manager and no escalation occurred, or his written claim is contradicted by his own recorded words from twenty-five minutes earlier. The file was closed before the call was ever placed — the conversation was never about review. It was about making sure the door could not be reopened. The full review was released publicly on June 8, 2025:
S4E3 — OPC Official Brad Carrier Ate Lunch While Citizen Reported National Security Breach, Sexual Assault, and Torture: https://youtu.be/BE9Bs7owK5k

So on January 24, 2026, I filed request P-2025-00180 under the Privacy Act: all OPC records relating to me and my files — the internal notes, the intake records, the staff communications discussing jurisdiction, PIPEDA applicability, and decisions not to proceed; all communications with ESDC, Irving Shipbuilding, and provincial commissioners; all records involving Bobby Rousson and Brad Carrier; every exemption, executive instrument, or Order in Council relied upon; and the workflow metadata showing when my files were created, accessed, escalated, deferred, or closed, and by whom. The request is aimed at the two moments the OPC never documented: the 2020 exemption that was cited by phone but never produced, and the June 4, 2025 escalation that was claimed but denied on tape. The internal record either substantiates them — or proves they were invented.

The OPC's response, dated January 27, 2026, asked me to supply the file numbers — for files the OPC itself opened, numbered, and closed — before it would begin processing, with a 30-day abandonment clause attached, and advised that complaints against the OPC itself must be mailed to the Privacy Commissioner Ad Hoc at a post office box in Fredericton, reachable by Gmail. On February 19, 2026, Gordini Valery wrote to acknowledge that the January notice itself contained an error, and that the OPC was still waiting on me to proceed. The file numbers they asked me to supply are these: PRIVINFO-139143. PRIVINFO-139757. PIPEDA-040119. PIPEDA-040565. PIPEDA-045577. PA-070308. A privacy regulator that requires the citizen to recite its own file history, routes complaints against itself to a P.O. box, and closes files before returning calls has answered the question I put to it directly and never received a reply to: who, exactly, is a Canadian supposed to turn to? The request is active. The metadata will answer what the correspondence would not — which is precisely why the correspondence was kept off the record.

The Missing ESDC Letter — Its connection to EMIC, J.D Irving, DND, Postmedia and Spyware

The ESDC/OPC letter setting out the jurisdiction determination on my PIPEDA complaint — the document at the center of the year-long "is Irving federally regulated" question — never reached me. It went missing from my mailbox. Its date is September 15, 2020.

Three separate things attach to that date or the days around it:

The letter itself is dated September 15, 2020 — the physical mail that disappeared before I could receive it, the one document that would have set out in writing the jurisdictional basis I spent twenty-six written requests trying to get defined.
EMIC Contract #2 commenced September 15, 2020 — the same date. The first EMIC contract matched the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Police; the second matches the date of the letter that went missing.
The land transfer events for Residence B fall in the same window, and the DND "wolf letter" — the military information operation that caused public panic about wolves on the loose, later found by the Department's own investigation to have lacked oversight — was dated September 19, 2020, four days later.
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-propaganda-exercise-that-caused-panic-about-wolves-on-the-loose-lacked-oversight-investigation-finds

Detailed infographic — Residence B, EMIC Contract #2, and the ESDC letter, all showing the September 15, 2020 date:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)

The non-arrival is not only my account. After the September 15, 2020 letter failed to reach me, ESDC sent its subsequent correspondence by registered mail, requiring me to attend the post office and sign for it in person. An institution does not switch to registered, signature-required delivery for no reason — the switch is ESDC's own implicit acknowledgment that ordinary delivery had failed. The missing letter is documented from both sides: my report that it never arrived, and ESDC's own change in delivery method that followed.

Outside parties would have to argue that I somehow knew about the overlapping dates with EMIC and the howling wolves, and simply decided to claim this letter — or letters — never made it to me. I checked with neighbours and others: no one out here has ever had mail go missing. In 38 years, I have never had mail go missing.

The fact of it is this. Anyone watching my systems would have seen the arguments — the inconsistencies between Jim Rennie's and the OPC's statements, how PIPEDA is written, and that it all looks applicable. We know my phone's GPS location was set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, and that its land transfers match the first EMIC contract, so we know these parties could reasonably see my systems. What they could not see was the decision by ESDC/OPC. And had that decision sided with me, they would have had to give me the audio recording — which would have gone very badly for Irving, DND, the Government, Jim Perrin, and, as we now know, EMIC. They could not monitor OPC and ESDC. The only way they could literally have known the state of that case was by having a copy of the letter. That is a fact. And here, all these dates match.

How could the VP of Human Resources have a different answer than the OPC and ESDC on jurisdiction? Why did ESDC not allow me to open a case, or answer basic questions about which time frames it was using? It is reasonable to assert that they did not want to answer the question. And here is the thing: if there is an Order in Council, what is the date it was created? Was it created only after my February 21, 2020 requests? I told them they had a serious hole and needed to plug it — but my request was already in, and then this occurs. The behaviour looks like them fixing a massive gap that had been identified in the investigation.

Cox & Palmer, Stephen McNeil, and Irving Shipbuilding — The CPSNS/NSHA Privacy Breach, the Unassessed Conflict of Interest, and the Escalation Record

Detailed Index

The conflict is documented in the regulator's own transmission records. On January 15, 2024, CPSNS disclosed my personal and confidential information to Colin Clarke of Cox & Palmer via TitanFile — the firm where Stephen McNeil, former Premier of Nova Scotia and brother of former HRP Acting Chief Robin McNeil, holds a senior position, and which has itself acknowledged a conflict of interest regarding J.D. Irving through its work involving Irving Shipbuilding.

When I raised that conflict on the same day CPSNS asked whether I wished to appeal, the files were closed instead. On April 29, 2024 — after the conflict had been explicitly raised — Douglas Grant disclosed additional information to the same firm.

After CPSNS was informed of the conflict and privacy concerns, they initially attempted to claim that I had not reported a sexual assault against a physician. The record clearly shows the allegation was against a physician. CPSNS did not investigate the reported sexual assault, nor did it provide a single support resource or referral.

When Suzanne Husbands was advised of the significant conflicts of interest, she did not conduct what I believe was a proper conflict assessment. Instead, she reprimanded me for taking steps to protect myself from what I believe was abuse and misconduct committed by CPSNS staff. This occurred after I had reported a sexual assault that was not investigated, while also reporting what I believe were multiple fabricated records, retaliation by NSHA and CPSNS, and ongoing threats.

Suzanne Husbands advised that I had until the end of the day on February 20, 2024 to request an appeal. However, at 12:16 PM, she replied stating, "I can confirm you did not request an appeal." At that moment, the review process was effectively terminated, despite my responses raising the privacy breach, conflict of interest, and requests for escalation already being in CPSNS's possession. A deadline described as "end of day" but enforced at 12:16 PM is, in my view, not a genuine deadline.

I continued contacting CPSNS regarding these issues. Eventually, Michelle Ouellette repeated the position that Suzanne Husbands had given me until the end of the day on February 20, 2024 to request an appeal and that I had failed to do so. The record shows that confirmation of "no request" was issued at 12:16 PM, at which point the opportunity for review had already been removed while my responses addressing the privacy concerns and requesting escalation were already in hand.

When this discrepancy was pointed out to Michelle Ouellette, she declined to engage further. In my view, this repeated the same conduct as Suzanne Husbands and reflected a broader pattern of refusing to address the underlying privacy breach and conflict of interest — while failing to inform Cox & Palmer, yet using the fabricated record to have Cox & Palmer retaliate against a complainant. For reference, the correspondence with CPSNS and Michelle Ouellette can be found here:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com /HTMLDocuments/2026-05-11_CPSNS_Michelle_Ouellette_PHIA_Privacy_Conflict_Concerns_RCMP_CSIS.html (https://tinyurl.com/4z53u9wt)

On April 1, 2026, formal privacy letters were mailed by Canada Post — stamped, tracked, and photographed — to Cox & Palmer and Valent Legal, with identical copies sent by email to Colin Clarke and Jane Elise Bates, Cox & Palmer's designated Privacy Officer.
Delivery confirmation — Jane Bates, Privacy Officer, April 1, 2026:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-04-01_Delivery_Confirmation_CoxAndPalmer_Privacy_Officer_Jane_Bates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/mr4cyjdn)
Physical letters stamped by Canada Post:
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-04-01_Privacy_Letters_Sent_To_CoxAndPalmer_And_Valent_Legal.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/5s5f4r55)
Email text as sent April 1, 2026:
https://tinyurl.com/bdd8auy7

On May 10, 2026, recorded calls were placed to the voicemail boxes of Colin Clarke and Jane Bates regarding the conflict of interest (https://youtu.be/aFOFetsvZyg and https://youtu.be/NDka76yN9IE).

On May 11, 2026, a further letter was sent to CPSNS, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, the RCMP, and CSIS (https://tinyurl.com/yuemdsv3), together with a video reviewing the voicemail messages (https://youtu.be/NWqosz3LZL8). No response was received from any of the parties.

On May 18, 2026, the Season Finale (S4E12) was released, combining the recorded voicemail messages left for Michelle Ouellette, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, and the Cox & Palmer main office with a four-part formal letter:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-05-18_Requests_To_RCMP_Criminal_Investigation_Calls_To_CPSNS_CoxAndPalmer.html (https://tinyurl.com/4uuvwfdw)
Full video: https://youtu.be/XWkU9dzkcbA

As part of those submissions, Commissioner Mike Duheme, Commissioner Dan Morrow, and their respective offices were added to the correspondence, requesting investigations into what I believe was the cover-up by CPSNS. Sections were also directed to W5, The Fifth Estate, CTV, Global, Postmedia, and CBC, requesting they investigate what I believe to be serious misconduct by CPSNS and the issues surrounding Cox & Palmer.

Under Attachment5566, CSIS was requested to investigate the matter and extend that investigation to Colin Clarke and Jane Bates. I further requested that, if Cox & Palmer did not respond within five days, the investigation be expanded to include all senior partners of the firm.

A dedicated section addressed Stephen McNeil directly. Similar concerns were raised in the recorded voicemail messages, requesting that he come forward if he possessed knowledge relevant to the conflict of interest — or risk further damage to Cox & Palmer should these issues remain unaddressed.

Cox & Palmer had already been provided with the correspondence exchanged with CPSNS and therefore knew that CPSNS had stated it was Cox & Palmer's responsibility to determine whether a conflict of interest existed. They were also aware of the concerns I had raised regarding the disclosure of my personal information, the potential conflicts involving Stephen McNeil, and the firm's acknowledged work involving Irving Shipbuilding.

They were specifically provided with Michelle Ouellette's May 8, 2026 response, which states:
"With respect to allegations of sexual assault by a different physician, your option is to file a formal complaint. You will need to know and provide their identity on the complaint form before we could consider it. The physician named on the complaint will likely retain legal representation through CMPA, which could possibly result in CMPA assigning the case to Cox & Palmer. It is the duty of lawyers to determine if they have conflicts of interest."

As a result, Cox & Palmer was aware that CPSNS had placed responsibility for assessing any conflict of interest on the firm itself. By not addressing the conflict-of-interest concerns that I raised, I remained unable to proceed with filing an additional complaint regarding the reported sexual assault, because I could not reasonably risk further personal and confidential information being disclosed to the same law firm that employs Stephen McNeil and has acknowledged conflicts involving Irving Shipbuilding.

The concern is straightforward. If the same firm continues to represent the physicians while simultaneously receiving my confidential information from CPSNS, any disputed account of the events — including the reported sexual assault — would naturally be advanced in the interests of their existing clients. Until the conflict and privacy issues are independently addressed, I do not believe it is reasonable to expose additional personal and confidential information to the same parties.

On June 5, 2026, I received a registered mail response from Cox & Palmer, signed by Patrick Fitzgerald, general counsel to the firm.
https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_07/2026-06-05_registered_Mail_From_Cox_And_Palmer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/32nrfwr6)

The response acknowledged receipt of the physical and electronic correspondence sent to Colin Clarke and Jane Bates on April 1, 2026, the subsequent voicemails, and the correspondence to third parties on which those individuals were copied. It confirmed that "Cox & Palmer received information about you as part of its representation of two doctors against whom you made complaints" to CPSNS — but stated that this information "is protected by solicitor-client privilege" and that the firm "cannot provide access to or further information about that information as requested," closing that it would "continue to protect your personal information in accordance with its internal policies and legal obligations."

The response did not address whether the conflict of interest had been assessed after it was raised, why additional disclosures continued after the conflict had been identified, whether the concerns involving Stephen McNeil or the firm's acknowledged Irving Shipbuilding conflict had been reviewed, or whether CPSNS should have continued disclosing my information after those concerns had been raised. But as the firm confirms it received the calls and correspondence, all of this information was in its possession — so at this stage it is reasonable to conclude that Cox & Palmer Intake, Colin Clarke, Jane Bates, and Patrick Fitzgerald are all aware of it.

The response is dated approximately 65 days after my April 1, 2026 privacy correspondence, despite my understanding that PIPEDA generally requires organizations to respond to requests concerning an individual's personal information within 30 days. As a result, while the letter confirmed that Cox & Palmer had received my correspondence and my information from CPSNS, it left unresolved the central issues that had prompted my privacy complaint and escalation.

McInnes Cooper and David Fraser — The Conflict of Interest, the Spyware Testimony, and the Simmonds Connection

Detailed Index

David Fraser of McInnes Cooper is one of Canada's leading privacy lawyers, based in Halifax, and a regular media voice on surveillance and spyware. He has been on the distribution thread since the beginning of this matter. This section documents the conflict of interest he declared, the assistance his office declined at the moment I needed it most, the public testimony he gave on the exact subject I had been documenting six days after I was falsely arrested, and the fact that the evidence was placed directly in front of him.

On August 17, 2021, I wrote to Fraser seeking help: "I don't have a lot of money, but I'm willing to pay you to educate me and listen to my story. I can almost guarantee that the underbelly of this issue is unlike anything you or anyone else might expect — and it's fully quantified... So please be blunt; I can handle it and I need your honesty." On August 18, 2021, he replied: "From what I've been able to discern from the message, my firm would have a conflict of interest in providing you with advice in these circumstances. Sorry I can't help." He did not identify the source of the conflict. The declaration is documented here alongside his participation in the July 30, 2020 White Hatter privacy video — the same video deconstructed in my December 23, 2021 security review as an example of inadequate privacy-assessment methodology.

I engaged with Fraser's public work across four detailed reviews, each posted in full:

First review — August 27, 2021: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/August27th2021_AI_Review_%20David_Fraser_Whitehatter_Daniel_Therrien.html (https://tinyurl.com/5hd6cup5)
Second review — December 23, 2021 (within the JD Irving Security Review, including the section documenting how Jodi Posavad failed her security review and the serious privacy issues associated): https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December23rd2021_JDIrving_Security_Review.html
Third review — December 20, 2022: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/December20th2022_David_Fraser_Third_Review.html (https://tinyurl.com/ztr8f6uj)
Fourth review — January 4, 2023: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/January4th2023_David_Fraser_Fourth_Review.html (https://tinyurl.com/4ywc5kxy)

Across those reviews I engaged Fraser directly and on his own terms. His yearbook carries the line "What the hell do you think this is, public school?" — a private-school quote that reveals a certain contempt for the everyday public. So throughout the reviews I put the question back to him: how am I doing, for public school? I have no legal background and no firm behind me — I am a self-taught systems analyst from Ecum Secum — and across four detailed reviews I matched and, on the substance, outworked one of the country's leading privacy lawyers in his own field. The point is not personal. It is that the analysis stands on its merits regardless of who produced it, and that the people best positioned to engage it declined to.

This matters because of what Fraser knew and when. He has publicly commented on Cambridge Analytica. EMIC is Cambridge Analytica's sister operation through SCL Group, running Target Audience Analysis contracts in Nova Scotia. On July 30, 2022, I placed it directly in front of him — a single graphic sent to the thread carrying his own yearbook quote alongside the EMIC contract and its director, Gaby van den Berg — ensuring he saw the company, the director, and the connection to the very subject he had spoken about publicly. He cannot claim he was unaware. With all of this evidence listed and delivered, one of the country's foremost privacy experts, commenting publicly on exactly this field, did nothing.

Reference — yearbook quote, EMIC contract, and director Gaby van den Berg on a single graphic: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2022-07-30_David_Fraser_Kevin_McCoy_EMIC_Gaby_Van_Den_Berg_Public_School_Video_Relationships.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/27hh5kuk)

Then came August 2, 2022. While I was falsely arrested and detained, both I and my aunt called David Fraser's office for assistance. His office pushed back before he eventually responded with a general list of lawyers who might handle an IPTA matter. The Mount Hope contact form, in my own hand, lists him by name:

Mount Hope contact form — David Fraser: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_04/2022-08-05_Mount_Hope_Contact_Form_David_Fraser_RCMP_Spyware_Pegasus_Inquiry.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/vf427wpu)

The timing of what followed is the core of this section. On August 8, 2022 — six days after my arrest — the Canadian Press reported that the RCMP had used spyware in 32 investigations since 2017, and that MPs had been told the force's use of such tools was broader than previously reported, with Pegasus specifically discussed. On August 8–9, 2022, David Fraser appeared on CTV National News speaking to the RCMP's spyware use during the parliamentary inquiry into that very subject — spyware, and the setting of device data, being precisely what I had been documenting within TWNN, including the GPS manipulation to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater and the Valent Legal and Burchells incidents. The lawyer whose firm had declared a conflict of interest in advising me, and whose office referred me elsewhere while I was detained, went on national television days later to discuss the exact category of conduct at the centre of my case — after the evidence had already been placed directly in front of him.

The pattern extends to Angela Simmonds. On January 8, 2022, I emailed her office seeking representation regarding the matter with J.D. Irving; her office replied that the message had gone to spam and that, as an MLA, she could not provide legal assistance. On March 13, 2023 — the day I attended HRP to file my Professional Standards complaint and was arrested a second time — her husband, Dean Simmonds, came out, asked if everything was going okay, and then asked everyone else; he was aware I was there. On or about April 5, 2023, Angela Simmonds joined McInnes Cooper as a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor (https://hrlawcanada.com/2023/04/angela-e-simmonds-joins-mcinnes-cooper-as-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-advisor/). Both Simmonds knew of the core issue and knew I had been falsely arrested twice — and Angela Simmonds then joined the same firm whose privacy lead had declared a conflict of interest in advising me, placing her within that conflict as well.

Both Dean Simmonds — a Halifax Regional Police superintendent — and Angela Simmonds were also at the centre of a documented RCMP conduct matter in July 2021. The couple, both Black, said they were racially profiled and ordered out of their vehicle at gunpoint with a C8 carbine during a traffic stop near North Preston. RCMP Inspector Jeremie Landry, then acting Halifax-district chief officer, emailed a select group of Halifax councillors on July 16, 2021 asserting that "at no time were any firearms pointed at them" — while the RCMP's own public statement conceded that "a gun was drawn but not pointed at anyone." The email was released to the public only after being almost entirely redacted by the RCMP, and drew concern from a former police commissioner about the force privately briefing select councillors on an active investigation (Halifax Examiner, October 1, 2021): https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/government/city-hall/rcmp-release-redacted-email-to-councillors-about-traffic-stop-involving-halifax-cop/

The result is a single firm — McInnes Cooper — through which two separate avenues of legal help closed: a declared conflict that was never explained, an office that referred me elsewhere while I was detained, public testimony on the exact subject of my case, evidence placed directly in the hands of a national privacy expert who did nothing, and a subsequent hire who already knew the whole history. Each fact is dated and independently verifiable. Together they document why, at every point I sought counsel on the privacy dimension of this matter, the door was already closed.

Target Audience Analysis (TAA) 1% Events

Detailed Index

What is Target Audience Analysis:

Target Audience Analysis is not a theory. It is a documented NATO and UK Ministry of Defence methodology, described in NATO's own publications and examined by the UK Parliament.

As laid out by Dr. Steve Tatham — a 26-year UK Armed Forces veteran who commanded the UK PsyOps Group — in NATO's Three Swords Magazine (StratCom Centre of Excellence), TAA is the comprehensive study of a social group across a host of psycho-social research parameters for one purpose: determining how best to change that group's behaviour. It goes beyond opinion polling. It is designed to explain and forecast behaviour, and to produce actionable recommendations for influence campaigns. Critically, NATO's own literature states that TAA can be undertaken covertly — the audience is not necessarily aware they are research subjects, and the role of government or third parties can be made invisible.

The UK defines three tiers of TAA capability. Tier 3 is remote, open-source analysis of a target group — internet-based research aggregated for military usage. Tier 2 is primary research involving actual contact with the audience, largely attitudinal, and is typically undertaken by coalition PsyOps forces. Tier 1 is the full scientific instrument: a multi-source, verified diagnostic methodology conducted in-country, in the target's own language, used to identify the specific motivations behind an individual group's behaviour.

The methodology was developed over 25 years by the Behavioural Dynamics Institute and delivered through SCL Group — the parent company of Cambridge Analytica. When the UK Parliament's DCMS Committee examined SCL, whistleblower Brittany Kaiser testified that prior to 2015 the TAA methodology was considered a weapon — "weapons grade communications tactics" — such that the UK Government had to be notified if it was to be deployed in another country (Disinformation and 'fake news' report, para. 294).

UK Parliament report: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/179110.htm (https://tinyurl.com/kwhesvay)

Why TAA applies here

Detailed Index

EMIC contracts published on the Government of Canada's own procurement website document work of this nature, with dates and details that connect directly to events documented throughout this record (see EMIC Contract #1 and Contract #2, linked in the corpus). This is the reason TAA is treated as a live analytical category on this site rather than speculation: the capability exists, it is documented by NATO and the UK Parliament, it is designed to operate invisibly, and contracts consistent with its use appear on the public record in direct temporal proximity to these events.

The TAA 1% methodology

Detailed Index

Because TAA is designed to be invisible, no single event can prove it. That cuts both ways — and it demands discipline. So this record deliberately under-claims rather than over-claims.

Each event listed below is assigned a 1% base probability of being an associated psychological operation event. That means each event, taken alone, is treated as 99% likely to be coincidence, noise, or ordinary explanation. No single entry is offered as proof of anything. The 1% assignment exists precisely to prevent over-association and stacking — the analytical failure mode where every anomaly gets absorbed into a narrative.

What the framework does allow is honest pattern analysis. Independent 1% events should be rare and randomly distributed. When they instead cluster tightly around specific dates — complaint filings, disclosures, FOI responses, legal contact — and repeatedly reference the same addresses, contracts, and thematic material, the aggregate probability that all of them are coincidence shrinks with each addition. The reader is not asked to believe any individual event. The reader is asked to look at the distribution.

Each event below is documented with dates, records, and links where available. Everything is cited so the pattern can be independently verified rather than taken on trust.

TAA Examples:

Detailed Index

The Following are considered associated TAA 1% Events.

Within the first few days after filing the complaint (approximately December 12, 2019, over a few days), my cousin and their neighbours, who live in Porters Lake, noticed a man in an SUV watching their children, who appeared to be taking pictures. They cornered him; he got out of his vehicle and stated he was a "private investigator." It was reported to the RCMP that there was potentially a pedophile targeting children. The neighbours were never contacted back.
December 10, 2019 — the day after I filed the complaint with Irving Shipbuilding, I had a job interview with the Government at 1505 Barrington Street in Halifax. This is also where the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) is located. Within 8 hours of that interview, two HRP officers pulled in behind me at a McDonald's as I was leaving the city, asking if I had seen a woman in a nightdress wandering around. My disabled mother, whom HRP had previously helped look for, was known for her nightdresses. <link>
December 12, 2019 — I was in contact with Irving Shipbuilding and advised them I would make myself available in the city. Instead, I stayed in Sheet Harbour with a friend; we went and got food and took the dogs for a walk. I decided to leave my phone behind. Upon arriving at the water's edge, a small plane came in and circled around us with a large camera. My friend stated, "Man, why are they flying so low? Do you see the big camera?" It could have been someone taking pictures of their property; however, given the full context, it's worth mentioning, and aviation records can confirm the event.
- 2019-12-10_HRP-DND-RCMP-EMIC-Government-Terrorism-Harjit Sajjan-Planecident_december 12th 2019 - google maps image of placecident.jpg (1494×849) (https://tinyurl.com/3rahpfje)
During this investigation at Irving Shipbuilding, I also uncovered phishing emails sent from an IP address (216.208.235.222) directly owned by the Royal Military College of Canada. They were received December 4, 2018 — just before the job interview at Irving Shipbuilding between myself, the manager, and the Director. Upon investigation in late 2019, the evidence indicated with a high degree of certainty that they were associated with shell companies used by intelligence agencies, while the IP address was also redeployed to a new geographic location. The server wasn't dead and allowed me to connect through a web browser. These connections would have set off flags inside their systems.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2026-05-28_Military_IP_Marie_Sommer.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/nnba9btk)
You will see, directly in my complaint of December 9, 2019, I was talking about howling and dogs, and through the investigation at Irving Shipbuilding I specifically used animal behaviour to describe their actions, alongside my detailed professional, technical, and ethical reviews. DND (EMIC,) apparently operating out of that address in Stillwater, NS, would then engage in wolves-howling psychological warfare and training.
While protesting racism locally, 40 km from an RCMP detachment, two RCMP vehicles showed up, stalking me up and down the road. It concerned locals, who were extremely alarmed by the behaviour. When my face appeared in the Guysborough Journal, my internet was hard cut and required a technician to fix it at the line.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-06-10_Police%20Stalking%20June%2010th%202020.JPG (https://tinyurl.com/3t289xf9)
I found my phone's GPS location set to 9330 Highway #7, Stillwater, NS. This address appears associated with EMIC.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2019-07-05_EMIC%20%20%20%20%20AMI%20%20%20%20%20Postmedia%20showing%20matching%20October%202016%20dates.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/bde6y2mc)
Physical mail went missing from my mailbox — the letter deciding jurisdiction from ESDC/OPC regarding my obtaining the audio recording from Irving Shipbuilding. The letter was dated September 15, 2020; the start date of the EMIC contract was September 15, 2022. The land events for Residence B are dated September 14, 2020.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2020-09-15_Residence%20B%20Matching%20Second%20EMIC%20Contract,%20%20ESDC%20mail%20went%20missing,%20McKoy%20and%20McNeil%20left%20Office,%20finding%20radio%20signals.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3z4xcxmz)
Google Analytics spikes directly correlate with disclosure in September 2021, jumping into the hundreds when I send emails. This correlates with other large spikes, notably July 28, 2022 — just before the hacking event involving Valent Legal, and my false arrest and torture.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_Google%20Analytics%20from%202021%20and%202022,%20dates%20showing%20my%20account%20locked%20and%20that%20they%20tried%20to%20delete%20EMCI%20contracts%20.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24rk38fv)
Burchell's Lightning Protection (BLP) reported that their phone systems were hacked and called me — at the same time I was discussing Burchells LLP (BLLP) on the main email thread, where you can see the spiking.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_August%2001%202022%20-%20Phishing%20Attempt%20From%20Valent%20Legal.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yc6k4576)
January 5, 2023 – An account named Judy Ross attempted to add me on Snapchat in early 2021. You will see her correlation with writing animal books — more specifically, howling wolves — which I would have read as a child. Another significant event occurred in 2023.
- https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2023-01-05_Showing%20TAA%20event%20with%20Judy%20Ross%20and%20Leyla%20Li.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yck326vu)
March 21, 2022 – I emailed the main email thread advising that I had correlated events with Postmedia and stated I would not stop until there were criminal charges. The next day, the Liberals and NDP announced a Supply and Confidence Agreement.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-03-22%20Where%20i%20said%20there%20would%20be%20charges%20then%20NDP%20and%20libs%20do%20confidence%20agreement.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/y8jvz9pe)
I received a response to my FOI regarding my wallet from HRP the same day Kevin Mooney stepped down as CEO and President of Irving Shipbuilding.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/added_2025_02/2021-02-05_Kevin%20McCoy%20President%20of%20Irving%20Shipbuilding%20Stepped%20Down%20Kevin%20Mooney%20would%20take%20over%201%20day%20before%20Stephen%20Mcneil%20leaves%20office.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/f8uphjwj)
August 1, 2022 — Valent Legal was hacked, and the attack targeted me with links designed to look like the Government of Canada. Valent Legal was the only legal entity where I had contacted an individual directly. Logs show their server was compromised, and they confirmed they did not send the email. (Consistent with the Burchell's hack in 2021.)
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_August%2001%202022%20-%20Phishing%20Attempt%20From%20Valent%20Legal.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yc6k4576)
Three months after my false arrest and torture, HRP held a historic, never-before-done vote of confidence in their Chief of Police, Dan Kinsella. 84% of members voted; 96.5% voted no confidence. During this period, the EMIC contracts were deleted from the government website. I emailed the main email thread twice, indicating to the RCMP that this had occurred and that the contracts were still available on the Wayback Machine, which is admissible in court. EMIC Contract #1 matches the date Dan Kinsella was sworn in as Chief of Police. The contracts only reappeared after my emails and the vote.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-2_Proof%20EMIC%20contracted%20existed%20August%2029th%202022%20and%20Sepotember%2015th%20but%20as%20of%20October%2026th%202022%20they%20cant%20be%20found.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/24y5d68m)
Judy Ross, and then Leyla Li, attempted to add me in early 2023 — Leyla Li being a top physicist and mathematician in the US. I had requested that a physicist and mathematician contact me. If you check the date on the certificate, I was contacted one day before the date it states it was issued.
- https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2023-01-05_Showing%20TAA%20event%20with%20Judy%20Ross%20and%20Leyla%20Li.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/yck326vu)
Premier Tim Houston showed up January 29, 2023 — the morning my mother passed away. Neighbours reported lights in my house, and a family friend stated someone approached them in line at Tim Hortons talking about being from CSIS, and then simply walked out.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/February17th2023_Mom_Passed_Away_Tim_Houston_Present_At_Hospitol.html (https://tinyurl.com/3zvtsfut)
I was served by a bailiff on August 31, 2023. NSHA was trespassing me from their properties. The letter stated that I was there and that they read the letter to me, providing me with the white, yellow, and pink copies. I was never there, never said I was going to be there, and live over 140 km away. There are no records of me ever causing any issues at NSHA. It was a full fabrication, and it appears the same person completed the entire form, including signing for the witness.
- https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2024_04/2023-08-31%20Blocked%20from%20Victoria%20General%20Served%20by%20Bailiff.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/kvf7pvj6)
I received cold calls from Procurement Canada linking back to a realty that may have facilitated the land transfers for 9330, as well as Robert Zed, Jodi Posavad's boss. Nobody on the line, no voicemails, and no follow-up calls. Gaps were specifically left for these players, and these calls filled them. I would the received a text from Beth Israel Lahey Health Behavioural Services which is also consistent with the cold calls.
- Procurement Canada: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2025-06-14_Infographic_Showing_Phone_Number_Associated_With_Call_Is_With_James_Rogers_Public_Services_And_Procurement_Canada.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/3zww9kcj)
- Robert Zed and Jodi Posavad
  - https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_05/2025-07-16_Drop_Of_Physical_Copies_Complaints_OIPC_Office.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/wmyxyf3)
- Beth Israel Lahey Health Behavioural Services
  - https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com//Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2025-06-27_Received_Text_Message_From_19782592846_Beth_Israel_Lahey_Health_Behavioral_Services.jpg (https://tinyurl.com/48tr6hn7)