A copy of this Letter can be found Online at:
Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/yuafunmy
RECORD INTEGRITY AND EVIDENCE NOTICE
Identity Verification
Please be advised that I have done my best to confirm the identities of the individuals referenced without being intrusive. The names provided were given to me by members of the RCMP however its possible that some first and last names got switched around. Given the serious nature of these issues and the ongoing public safety concerns created by some of the officers involved, I have no other choice but to use the names as they were provided to me. If any name has been recorded incorrectly, I will apologize and correct the record immediately.
CRCC Submission Requirements
Paul from the CRCC advised on May 25, 2025, in response to my notice that I would be submitting individual complaints against other officers due to the lack of response from the CRCC:
“Thank you Scott Jewers. In the future, please limit your online public complaint submissions for each individual complaint to 6 pages. If your submission exceeds 6 pages, the Commission may refuse to accept it. For the current case we will make an exception.”
Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/mrxkc57f
However, on February 24, 2026, Paul also stated:
“45.68 The Commission may, if in its opinion it is appropriate to do so, merge two or more complaints for the purposes of an investigation, review, or hearing.”
Based on this direction:
- There are 14 different officers, at 6 pages per complaint, allowing for a total of 84 pages to be submitted. In total, there are approximately 48 pages in this document.
- The total video material amounts to 6 hours, 23 minutes, and 46 seconds. Divided across 14 officers, this equals approximately 27 minutes and 24 seconds of video evidence per officer, which remains well within the 60-minute limit per case that the CRCC has indicated it will accept.
Evidence Record
All videos provided to the CRCC were recorded live while calling the voicemail of Shelly Mews, which you can hear her voicemail read back her phone number to confirm (RCMP Special Victims Unit) at 902-220-2013. As a result, these recordings form part of the RCMP communication record and should be considered direct evidence by the CRCC.
- 2025-05-03 – Call to Curt Wallace and Shelly Mews RCMP Special Victim Unit asking to press charges 2025 05 03 - https://youtu.be/9tZoNy0to7k (15:08)
- S4E1 – Call to RCMP Requesting CSIS Progress Operation DUSKHOWL along the coast of Nova Scotia – https://youtu.be/yC-vKKCkaxA (8:35)
- S4E5 Call to RCMP The Fraud of Cory Bushell and the CRCC Review of False Arrest – March 13th 2023 – https://youtu.be/EkbkumKe-Hs (1:23:48)
- S4E6 Deep Dive into False Arrest, Torture, and Sexual Assault on August 2nd 2022 – https://youtu.be/KOE2qzYTpng (2:34:03)
- S4E7 Deep Dive of Police Abuse / cover up of sexual assault / Connecting Postmedia to Mueller Report – https://youtu.be/JzMIxrZlHNc (2:25:55)
Record Development
This case was originally opened with the CRCC in March 2023. Many of the additional evidence submissions and officer references were added afterward as the situation continued to develop.
Had the CRCC properly recorded the complaint, the abuse reported, and the subsequent retaliation at the time it was first raised, much of the additional documentation generated over the following three years (as of March 8, 2026) would not have been necessary. The volume of evidence submitted is therefore a direct result of the failure to properly address the complaint at the outset.
Independent Verification
Everything stated here can be fact-checked at:
www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com
Readers are encouraged to verify the information using multiple sources, including search engines such as Google, Bing, Wikipedia, and other research tools. Given the seriousness of the issues raised, any reviewer—including the CRCC—is encouraged to independently verify the evidence and recordings referenced here to ensure that the full factual record is properly considered.
Paul and CRCC
Thank you for your response. This reply provides the specific complaints regarding the individual officers you requested. However, I am increasingly concerned about the manner in which this complaint has been characterized and handled. For clarity, this message summarizes the conduct, omissions, and institutional concerns that have arisen during the 1,082+ days this matter has been before the CRCC without meaningful resolution.
1. Evidence Involving Corporal Atwell
The following excerpts come from an audio recording dated September 13, 2024 between myself and Corporal Atwell of the RCMP Musquodoboit Harbour detachment regarding a Facebook post referencing Jessica Welke (RCMP Sheet Harbour) and the alleged cover-up of sexual assault and abuse.
This conversation occurred after Corporal Atwell attended my home on August 22, 2024. During that visit he laughed in my face about the reported sexual assault and other abuse. He stated he would review the matter and follow up. He did not do so, and it appears he may have fabricated records to indicate otherwise.
Recording 1
Audio Recording 1 (0:46) Short URL: https://youtu.be/gDysMWEeueM
- Scott: "…Seemingly like this is interesting information I was giving you, right? I assumed that's what you were going to do."
- Corporal Atwell: "Sorry, no. I thought I was clear — the reason I was there was because of the Facebook complaints made about Jessica."
- Scott: "Right. Which was brought on because of the serious issues reported in the complaint. When you read that, you read there was a sexual assault — but you're okay with that and not okay with someone being upset about a police officer. That seems strange. Because anybody would know a sexual assault is exponentially worse than anything I said."
- Atwell: "Well I'm pretty confident in our members' abilities to investigate things, but I'll have a look…"
- Scott: "So… she didn't just do it because she was a police officer?"
Recording 2
Audio Recording 2 (0:39) Short URL: https://youtu.be/cC08LLQjN2o
- Scott: "That's what I mean. I reported it. When I reported it to the Civilian Review Board, the woman didn't record it. I brought it up with the corporal multiple times and he didn't record it either."
- Atwell: "I can guarantee the Civilian Review Board is pretty hard on us. They would have created a report every time someone calls."
- Scott: "But I'm telling you they didn't in this case. They didn't, sir, and I reported serious abuse towards me and my family."
These recordings directly raise concerns about whether the sexual assault report and related abuse were properly documented or investigated. They also reveal that Corporal Atwell dismissed my account using the same logic later demonstrated by Carol, David, and Paul at the CRCC — simply assuming I must be mistaken because the institution would never behave that way. This document demonstrates that Carol, David, and Paul did exactly what I described, not once but multiple times. That pattern of institutional dismissal across both the RCMP and the CRCC is not coincidental; it is the mechanism by which serious allegations are suppressed.
2. CRCC Contact and File Closure
On August 16, 2024, David from the CRCC contacted me by telephone. During that call I wept and explained how extremely stressful the situation had been, pleading with him to please do something. When I described the behaviour of the original CRCC agent, David responded by stating "Carol wouldn't do that" — and then repeated the same conduct himself, failing to document the reported abuse during the call.
Following the conversation, I received the following email from the CRCC:
"…you expressed a desire to be contacted by the newly-assigned public complaint investigator, the Commission contacted the RCMP's National Public Complaint Directorate to request that Sgt. Trevor Allen contact you. Your file has now been closed."
On September 23, 2024, I responded, again advising the CRCC that the reported abuse — including the sexual assault — had not been referenced anywhere in their response. I also stated at that time that I had "evidence of individuals possibly trying to change the outcome of elections."
September 23, 2024 Correspondence Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/2uk3dbaj Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/May10th2025_CRCC_Detailed_Submission.html
It is important to note the timeline: my correspondence raising these issues was sent on September 23, 2024. Tim Houston ignored his own fixed-election-date legislation and called a snap election on October 27, 2024, which took place on November 26, 2024. I could not have known about this election when I wrote. At the same time, Tim Houston had been tagged on Facebook and X regarding all updates to this matter and was therefore aware of the allegations being raised.
3. CRCC Questions and Subsequent Delay
On October 30, 2024, Paul from the CRCC sent a list of questions. Notably, those questions explicitly acknowledged that a sexual assault had been reported. Examples include:
"You stated that you reported the premier showing up the morning your mother passed away. The Commission would like to express its sincere condolences on the passing of your mother."
"You stated that you reported a 'sexual assault'."
I decided to wait, expecting the RCMP and CRCC to act reasonably. No contact was received from Sgt. Trevor Allen, Cory Bushell, or the CRCC. As a result, I submitted a detailed response on May 10, 2025.
May 10, 2025 Detailed Submission to CRCC Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/ykjvbzma Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/May10th2025_CRCC_Detailed_Submission.html
4. RCMP Investigation Outcome
On June 6, 2025, the RCMP issued a response indicating the case had been closed after more than 800 days — without ever contacting me and without any reference to the reported sexual assault. The letter stated:
"Mr. Jewers, I would like to offer a sincere apology for the length of time it took to finalize this public complaint. It is beyond the mandated response time to complete a Public Complaint investigation and to provide a Final Report. We will strive to provide a timelier response in the future."
Notably, no written statement of any kind appears to have been taken from Jessica Welke. Instead, it appears she was informally advised that a serious complaint was coming, while the official record produced by the RCMP contained significant inaccuracies and omissions.
On July 9, 2025, I submitted a detailed rebuttal identifying several material inaccuracies and formally requesting a CRCC review.
July 9, 2025 Rebuttal and CRCC Review Request Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bde4y9hb Full URL: https://thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html
The result is a system that effectively provides plausible deniability: the RCMP can point to the CRCC, the CRCC can point back to the complainant, and the victim continues to bear the consequences while the underlying misconduct remains unaddressed.
5. Follow-Up Attempts
Following the June 6, 2025 RCMP letter, I sent periodic follow-ups requesting confirmation of receipt and asking basic procedural questions. These included:
- Has the RCMP letter been isolated from the submitted rebuttal and review request?
- Has this case been escalated to a CRCC Director?
- Has it been escalated to Commissioner Mike Duheme or Commissioner Dennis Daley?
- Has this case been escalated to CSIS (requested September 11, 2025)?
- Given documented RCMP false statements, career stakes, and audio recordings of RCMP threats against me, how can I receive a fair investigation — particularly where there has already been an uncontestable cover-up of serious abuse, including a violent sexual assault involving both RCMP and CRCC conduct?
At the close of each follow-up I stated clearly:
"I will continue to submit these questions weekly until they are answered."
A review of my emails will show I contacted the CRCC approximately every 16 days — consistent with the standard professional practice of following up roughly every two weeks. This was a basic, responsible record of contact attempts, not harassment.
Despite this, no response was received from the CRCC or from Paul for more than eight months. If the CRCC had simply acknowledged receipt of my submissions or indicated the matter was under review, the situation would not have escalated. Instead, the absence of any response occurred while I was repeatedly flagging ongoing public safety concerns.
6. February 10, 2026 Response
When Paul finally responded on February 10, 2026, the reply did not address the substance of the complaint. Instead, it focused on the number of follow-up emails I had submitted:
"While you are certainly entitled to an update on your complaint, I would note that you have submitted numerous unsolicited emails and attachments to this Commission since May 25, 2025, despite the fact our Commission asked in its October 20, 2024 email that 'you only answer the questions asked and do not supply information beyond the questions that are being asked.'"
It is worth noting that Paul does not assert that I did anything improper between October 20, 2024 and May 25, 2025 — a period of approximately seven months. Only after the RCMP closed the case without investigation, without contacting me, and without addressing the sexual assault allegations did I resume regular contact. The Commission's own records indicate it had asked Sgt. Trevor Allen to contact me directly. He did not.
7. RCMP Letter Confirmation
Paul subsequently requested that I provide a copy of the June 6, 2025 RCMP letter. After clarification of which letter was being referenced, he wrote:
"We already had a copy of that letter in our possession."
That statement confirms the CRCC was aware of the contents of the RCMP letter indicating the case had been closed without investigation despite the existence of a reported sexual assault and a CSIS case number. There would have been no way for me to know that when he asked for it. The fact that he asked for it anyway, and the CRCC already had it, raises additional procedural questions about how this matter has been handled internally.
8. Website Traffic Observations
During this period I also observed unusual traffic activity on my website, www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, which hosts much of the supporting material for this matter.
After emails were sent to the CRCC and other Canadian recipients, I observed measurable spikes in connections originating from Canada, the United States, China, Singapore, and Brazil. These spikes occurred even when no new content had been posted publicly. To rule out social media as the cause, I intentionally separated or delayed social media posts and in some cases sent emails on weekends. This caused the traffic patterns to break apart and become more specific, suggesting the activity was not caused by a single source and was likely not the result of ordinary public browsing.
This analysis and associated data were shared in real time with the CRCC, NSIRA, and CSIS. To ensure CSIS could properly access and review the information, the hosting server was moved to Canada so that full comparative data could be gathered between Canadian and U.S. deployments. The pattern of activity continued to the present day but briefly stopped when the server was relocated.
Analytics Reference 1: Spikes Correlating with CRCC Follow-Ups — October/November 2025 Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/3d3r8utd Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2025-11-06_2%20Google%20Analytic%20Spikes%20correlating%20with%20CRCC%20case%20follow%20ups%20and%20no%20social%20meida%20posts%20only%20email.jpg
Analytics Reference 2: Spikes from China, Brazil, and Singapore — October 2025 Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/3t8zukbs Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2025-10-23_Showing%20spikes%20from%20China%20Brazil%20and%20Signapore.jpg
Analytics Reference 3: Spikes from as Early as August 3, 2025 Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/y5abjype Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2025-10-18_Map%20of%20Google%20Analytic%20Spikes%20correlating%20with%20CRCC%20case%20follow%20ups%20until%20october%2018th%202025.jpg
Director Daniel Rogers of CSIS was also provided full access to the materials through Attachment 5566. The CRCC was repeatedly advised that a CSIS case number existed and that the matter could be escalated within the CRCC on that basis alone.
9. Systemic Concerns
Despite the evidence provided, the CRCC did not acknowledge the seriousness of the allegations or address the concerns raised regarding the RCMP's handling of the complaint.
The individuals involved at the CRCC are not the victims in this situation. At minimum, the record suggests a failure to properly respond to credible allegations involving sexual assault, institutional retaliation, and potential national security implications.
More concerningly, there is evidence that raises serious questions as to whether relevant information may have been intentionally suppressed in order to avoid scrutiny of potential misconduct involving CRCC personnel.
More broadly, this raises concerns about systemic failures within oversight mechanisms. When institutions fail to address serious allegations, the result is not only harm to the individual involved but also a broader erosion of trust in the systems designed to protect the public. Historically, systemic issues often arise when institutions repeatedly target or dismiss the concerns of individuals who lack the power or resources to defend themselves.
As part of my technical, ethical, and security evaluation — which will be formally submitted to the Department of National Defence (DND) and CSIS as part of my thesis — I have assessed the CRCC's conduct in this matter. Based on the record, the CRCC's response raises significant concerns regarding its handling of issues with potential national security implications.
The Record Would Not Exist Without Institutional Failure
It is important to state clearly for the record that the volume of documentation, recordings, video submissions, and follow-up correspondence that the CRCC has characterized as excessive would not exist had the RCMP or the CRCC done their jobs at any point during the 1,082+ days this matter has been open.
Had the RCMP Sheet Harbour detachment opened a case when the sexual assault was first reported, there would have been no need for body camera attendance, repeated calls requesting a case number, or years of public documentation.
Had the CRCC properly recorded the sexual assault allegation during the first call with Carol, this matter would have been resolved at the earliest stage.
Had David recorded the allegation when I wept on the phone and pleaded with him to act, the subsequent correspondence would not have been necessary.
Had Paul escalated the matter when the CSIS case number was provided, or when the sexual assault was explicitly acknowledged in his own October 2024 questions, the follow-up emails he later described as unsolicited would never have been sent.
Had Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen conducted a meaningful investigation rather than opening and closing a file in four days after 800 days of inaction, the detailed rebuttal submitted on July 9, 2025 and the subsequent long-form video documentation would not have been required.
Every recording, every video, every email, and every public post exists because an institution that was obligated to act did not. The documentation is not the problem — it is the evidence of the problem. The CRCC's attempt to reframe that documentation as misconduct on the part of the complainant is itself a continuation of the same pattern identified throughout this submission: shifting institutional failure onto the individual who experienced it.
The CRCC then compounded this by attempting to reprimand me for providing detailed, organized, and evidence-based follow-up correspondence — correspondence that was, in effect, doing the investigative work the CRCC was mandated and failed to do. Characterizing a complainant's sustained effort to have a violent sexual assault investigated as "unsolicited emails" while simultaneously failing to acknowledge the substance of a single one of those submissions is not a neutral administrative position. It is a choice. And it is a choice that, in the context of this record, raises serious questions about whether the CRCC was operating in good faith at any point during this process.
The CRCC is not the victim in this matter. The individuals at the CRCC who received emails are not the injured party. The person who reported a violent sexual assault, was laughed at by an RCMP officer, was told "Good" when describing threats made against them, was subjected to repeated mental health interventions instead of criminal investigation, and spent over 1,082 days attempting to have that allegation properly recorded — that is the injured party. The record should reflect that distinction clearly and without ambiguity.
10. Requests for Escalation
Given the concerns outlined above, I am formally requesting that this matter be:
- Escalated to CRCC Human Resources
- Reviewed by Chairperson Michelaine Lahaie
- Considered for self-reporting to CSIS under case reference Attachment 5566
I have also asked CSIS to engage with the CRCC to provide guidance on the appropriate handling of matters that involve potential national security considerations.
Finally, I am requesting that a representative of the CRCC contact me by telephone to confirm that someone other than Carol, David, or Paul has reviewed this matter and is aware of the complaint.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Scott Jewers
RCMP Sheet Harbour / RCMP Sherbrook Detachments
August 2, 2022 — Neighbouring Property Incident
During the period in which I was falsely arrested, detained, and subjected to abuse, a secondary incident occurred involving RCMP officers attending my neighbour's property after dark. Approximately two days into these events, my neighbour observed two RCMP officers behind their house late at night using flashlights. When confronted, the officers stated that their phone had dialed 911 and suggested the cause may have been water in the lines. This location is the same area where I had previously reported what I believed to be interference consistent with a possible IMSI catcher incident, first reported in January or February 2021.
Tiny URL: https://tinyurl.com/3vy8f89e
Additionally, I am in possession of images of an RCMP vest from RCMP Sheet Harbour found at a suspected drug drop site in November 2018 (Image 1).
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/yux2xdd4
October 26 and November 6, 2022 — EMIC Contracts and RCMP Acknowledgment
On October 26, 2022 and November 6, 2022, emails were sent to hundreds of recipients including the Halifax Regional Police, advising that EMIC contracts were being removed from the federal government website. These contracts correspond with the start date of Dan Kinsella's tenure as Chief of Police and were only added back to the website weeks after the vote of no confidence. Those emails raised these concerns broadly and provided context regarding the issue.
The RCMP subsequently attended my residence as a result of receiving those emails. During that interaction they acknowledged they had reviewed the content and confirmed that nothing in the emails was threatening and that the messages appeared to be raising a legitimate concern. Despite that acknowledgment, RCMP officers continued attending my residence and engaging in conduct I believe constitutes harassment and retaliation — while the underlying concerns about the deleted contracts and their connection to the matters I was reporting were never properly investigated.
Deleted contracts (publicly searchable):
Full URL: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/?sort=contract_date+desc&search_text=EMIC&page=1
Images of emails and recipients — October 26 and November 6, 2022:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/4zpbn3pr
I also directly requested that RCMP Sheet Harbour escalate the matter to Commissioner Brenda Lucki's office, which should have initiated review through senior command channels. This did not occur. Instead, officers continued to attend my property while denying my right to have the sexual assault allegations, the retaliation, and the related national security concerns properly investigated through any formal process.
July 27, 2023 — In-Person Evidence Submission
On this date I attended both RCMP Sheet Harbour and RCMP Sherbrooke in person, on camera, to provide detailed evidence including direct reference to the website documenting these events. Despite this, neither detachment contacted me afterward or made any proper record of the interaction or the evidence provided. This visit is documented and demonstrates that I have been forthcoming and have made repeated good-faith efforts to work with police to resolve these matters.
Full URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9qzi7-6Ag8 (Length: 25:49)
March 13, 2024 — Public Demonstration Outside Sheet Harbour Detachment
On the anniversary of my second false arrest and torture, I attended Sheet Harbour on foot carrying two signs that read:
"How did my GPS get set to 9330 Stillwater NS"
and
"Sheet Harbour RCMP Framed and Terrorized Me and My Disabled Mother"
I stood directly across the street from the RCMP Sheet Harbour detachment for an extended period. During that time, multiple members of the public stopped to express support. Several individuals also stopped to state that they themselves had been framed by the Sheet Harbour detachment. This interaction with the public is consistent with a broader community concern about the conduct of that detachment that exists independently of my own complaint.
Full URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IGtnHlru40 (Length: 0:30)
Notice of Institutional Awareness
It is not possible that RCMP Sheet Harbour was unaware of the abuse being reported. The public website, www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, has been continuously accessible and organized chronologically since its creation. Any officer, supervisor, or reviewer could access the full evidentiary record at any time and navigate directly to any date. The website was referenced directly during the July 27, 2023 in-person attendance at both detachments, was publicly tagged in social media posts directed at RCMP accounts, and was provided to the CRCC, NSIRA, and CSIS as part of formal submissions.
The RCMP's own acknowledgment — that the October and November 2022 emails were received, reviewed, and found to contain no threats — confirms that officers were actively monitoring communications related to this matter at an early stage. The suggestion that the same institution was simultaneously unaware of the sexual assault allegations, the retaliation being documented, and the national security concerns being raised is not credible. Officers attended my residence as a direct result of those emails. The institutional awareness was established by their own conduct.
The combination of in-person evidence submission on camera, sustained public documentation, direct social media tagging of RCMP accounts, a public demonstration held directly outside the detachment, and the RCMP's own confirmed receipt and review of related correspondence makes any claim of institutional ignorance implausible. The failure to act was not the result of a lack of notice. It was a choice.
RCMP and Institutional Awareness — General
Since 2023, the RCMP, CSIS, elected officials, and members of the media have been repeatedly and directly tagged in posts across Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube. These tags were active and specific, directly referencing the evidence, recordings, and issues being raised. The volume, consistency, and visibility of this public documentation make it highly unlikely that the matter was unknown to the relevant institutions and individuals.
The repeated public notification over an extended period demonstrates that these organizations and individuals had ample and ongoing opportunity to review the evidence being presented. The fact that certain aspects of the matter received selective attention while the core allegations — particularly those involving sexual assault, retaliation, and institutional cover-up — were not properly examined is itself a finding that warrants scrutiny. Where an institution demonstrably had notice of a serious allegation and chose not to act on it, the failure to act cannot later be characterized as an oversight.
Given the extent of the documentation and the sustained nature of the public record, it is reasonable to conclude that the seriousness of the situation was known. The responses that followed — including the substitution of mental health interventions for criminal investigations, the production of incomplete records, and the failure to open a case regarding a reported violent sexual assault — appear to have further compounded the harm while the underlying abuse was ignored, suppressed, or deliberately left uninvestigated.
The following accounts were directly tagged in connection with this matter. This list is non-exhaustive and is provided to establish the breadth of institutional and public notice that existed prior to and throughout the period covered by this complaint.
X (formerly Twitter)
@TimHoustonNS @zachchurchill @Canada @rcmpgrcpolice @RCMPNS @HfxRegPolice @hfxgov @CBCNS @CBCNews @CTVNews @davidpugliese @nationalpost @postmedianet @globalhalifax @globalnews @csiscanada @PierrePoilievre @liberal_party @CPC_HQ @NDP @Brett_CBC @NSHAcentral @ChenderClaudia @ElectionsCan_E @CBC @NSInfoPrivacy @DalhousieU @stfxuniversity @smuhalifax @MarkJCarney @CanadianForces @privacyprivee @althiaraj @chantalhbert @acoyne @RosieBarton @vassykapelos @erinotoole @ThomasMulcair @cathmckenna @telfordk @CanadianGreens @ElizabethMay @melaniejoly @ctvqp @charlieangusndp @MichaelCooperMP @MelissaLantsman @AndrewScheer @j_pedneault @citizenlab
@TimHouston @zachchurchill @JustinTrudeau @Canada @rcmpgrc @RCMPNS @HalifaxRegionalPolice @hfxgov @CBCNovaScotia @CBCNews @CTVNews @davidpugliese @nationalpost @postmedia @globalhalifax @globalnews @csiscanada @PierrePoilievre @liberal_party @CPC @NDP @Bell @Brett_CBC @JeffBezos @elonmusk @MarkZuckss @BillGates @nshealth @MHAhelpNS @UNHumanRights @hrw @ChenderClaudia @ElectionsCanada @CBC @CBCRadio @NSInfoPrivacy @EmmaLBriant @DalhousieU @stfxuniversity @smuhalifax @MarkJCarney2025 @CanadianForces @privacyprivee @jonathan.pedneault.9 @ElizabethMaySGI @CTVQuestionPeriod @GreenPartyofCanada @CBCPolitics
The inclusion of this list in a formal submission to the CRCC is intentional. It establishes that the public record was not limited to communications with the RCMP and the CRCC directly. Elected officials at both the provincial and federal level, national media organizations, academic institutions, international human rights bodies, and intelligence oversight agencies were all placed on notice through sustained and documented public activity. The absence of any meaningful institutional response — particularly from bodies with a statutory mandate to act on credible allegations of the kind being raised — is itself part of the record.
Jessica Welke (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
The following section documents a series of recorded interactions with Jessica Welke of RCMP Sheet Harbour, during which I made repeated attempts to formally pursue charges. Throughout these interactions I was calm, respectful, and attempting to work through proper channels. The conduct documented below is consistent with the broader pattern of retaliation and institutional dismissal reported to the CRCC.
Full call recording (12:04): Full URL: https://youtu.be/RQ9PlsVuZiI
Recording 1 — May 24, 2023 (0:12)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/6bxtmFj8EVk
During this call I described threats that had been made against me, specifically that I had been told that if I mentioned JD Irving I would be arrested and forcibly medicated. A background voice from RCMP Sheet Harbour responded to this disclosure with a single word: "Good." This response was unprompted, captured on recording, and raises serious concerns about the attitude of RCMP Sheet Harbour officers toward the threats and abuse being reported. It is consistent with the retaliatory conduct documented throughout this complaint.
Transcript excerpt:
- Scott: "And they told me, Jessica, that if I even mention JD Irving, they will have me arrested and pumped full of drugs."
- RCMP Sheet Harbour — Background Voice: "Good."
Recording 2 — Requesting to Press Charges (0:08)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/_Qer2Xpg5-Q
This recording captures me clearly and calmly stating my intention to formally press charges after reviewing the evidence.
Transcript excerpt:
- Jessica: "So."
- Scott: "I've gone over the evidence again, and I'm quite confident in what occurred. The only option I can see at this point is that I have to officially press charges."
Recording 3 — Jessica Welke Confirms She Will Call Monday (0:14)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/si2NulrqwMM
In this recording Jessica Welke explicitly confirmed she would call me the following Monday. That call never occurred. Instead, I was subsequently contacted by the MHMCT, which I believe was coordinated to continue the false narrative and enable further retaliation rather than address the complaint.
Transcript excerpt:
- Jessica Welke: "Okay."
- Scott: "Okay, so alright — thank you for taking my call and thank you for hearing me."
- Jessica Welke: "Of course, no problem Scott. I will call you Monday."
- Scott: "Okay, thank you. Have a good day and have a good weekend."
- Jessica Welke: "You too."
- Scott: "Bye bye."
Recording 4 — Loss of Trust and Fear of Retaliation (1:31)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/MZQ3Sqx4mKY
This recording captures me describing the psychological impact of the ongoing conduct and my complete loss of confidence in the ability or willingness of police to protect me. I describe feeling terrorized, explaining that a knock at my door had become a source of fear rather than safety, and that I had reached the point where calling the police was my last resort rather than my first.
Transcript excerpt:
- Scott: "I am at the stage now that I have absolutely been terrorized and that is how I feel. I get a knock at my door and I think — is it them coming to arrest me again?"
- Aunt: "False arrest."
- Scott: "And do another false arrest."
- Jessica: "Mmm hmm."
- Scott: "I'm actually terrified at this point. Jessica, if something happened, I can't call the police."
- Jessica: "Well, you can."
- Scott: "No, I can't. If I can't get answers from you and you can't answer basic questions, then I have to see the actions as malicious. And if you find something out about me or someone in my family, it is so reasonable that they will be targeted that it's scary. When there are SUVs stalking your cousin's children so badly that they get reported as pedophiles — that is really serious. That is coming from a group of people who don't have ethics and don't care about anybody, and that came from the police side of this. So I really can't contact the police. If something really bad happened, I don't even know what to do. My last option right now would be to call the police. And it's not because of you — but I have completely lost all faith in that process. The way I view it is that it is not there to help people. It is there to hurt people. Because I have been nothing but hurt by that process."
Summary
Jessica Welke and members of RCMP Sheet Harbour were aware that I was reporting serious abuse, that I wished to formally pursue charges, and that I possessed significant supporting evidence — including material I presented directly to her during an in-person interaction on March 31 / April 1, 2023. Despite explicitly confirming she would follow up, no contact was ever made. After waiting, I called Justin Hall that Monday and again requested that Jessica Welke contact me. He confirmed he would pass the message along. She did not call.
Given that the officers involved were fully aware of the seriousness of the allegations and my repeated requests to pursue the matter formally, this consistent failure to follow up — combined with the subsequent MHMCT contact — raises serious concerns about how RCMP Sheet Harbour handled these allegations and is consistent with a pattern of retaliation against someone attempting to exercise their legal rights and access due process.
Justin Hall (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
- Beginning in August 2022, Justin Hall attended my residence on multiple occasions during which I requested that a formal case be opened regarding the matters I was reporting. No such case was opened.
On one occasion he attended my aunt's residence after I reported receiving calls related to a sexual assault allegation and a suspicious vehicle that had been parked outside her home. During that interaction he asked directly: "Scott, you don't think this is related to that other stuff going on, do you?" This question is significant because it demonstrates that Justin Hall was personally aware of the broader context of what I had been reporting and was capable of connecting new incidents to the existing pattern — yet no formal action was taken.
On May 30, 2023, I contacted Justin Hall and advised him that Jessica Welke had confirmed she would call me. He stated he would pass the message along and have her contact me. She never did. This followed our May 24, 2023 call in which a background voice from RCMP Sheet Harbour responded to my description of the threats and abuse I had experienced with the word "Good" — a recording that is documented in the Jessica Welke section above.
Justin Hall was also present and aware during my attendance at RCMP Sheet Harbour on July 27, 2023, during which I appeared on body camera and submitted detailed evidence regarding these matters. Neither he nor any other officer at the detachment followed up or made a proper record of that interaction.
July 17, 2024
Following a public post I made regarding Jessica Welke and the sexual assault allegation — the same post that prompted Corporal Atwell's subsequent visit to my home — three separate police officers were present at locations where I regularly stopped while playing Pokémon Go. I had been using the game deliberately as a form of third-party GPS tracking, as the application logs location and timing data independently. The presence of three officers at my regular locations on that date, immediately following that specific post, is consistent with the pattern of surveillance and retaliation documented throughout this complaint.
Chad Samford / Sampson (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
On multiple occasions, Chad Samford attended my residence and stated openly that they were looking for a reason to charge me. During one of these interactions he asked directly what it would take to end the matter. I stated clearly that the answer was simple: open a case and have the office of Commissioner Brenda Lucki contact me directly, and I would stop. Neither of those things occurred.
Chad Samford was also present and aware during my attendance at RCMP Sheet Harbour on July 27, 2023, during which I appeared on body camera and submitted detailed evidence regarding these matters. As with the other officers at the detachment, no follow-up occurred and no proper record of that interaction was made.
July 17, 2024
Following the public post regarding Jessica Welke and the sexual assault allegation — the same post that prompted Corporal Atwell's visit — three separate police officers were present at locations where I regularly stopped while playing Pokémon Go, which I was using deliberately as a form of third-party GPS tracking. The presence of officers at those locations on that specific date is consistent with the broader pattern of surveillance and retaliation documented throughout this complaint.
Note Regarding Officer Conduct
I want to state clearly for the record that Chad Samford was, in my assessment, the most professional and reasonable officer I interacted with throughout this matter. In recognition of that, I have already advised RCMP leadership that given there are no outstanding concerns regarding his specific conduct, he would be deserving of a promotion. That assessment stands and is included here so the record accurately reflects the distinction between his conduct and that of others at the detachment.
Krista Pye (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
Krista Pye, accompanied by Sherry Charant (spelling uncertain), attended my residence unannounced and without being requested to do so. At the time, I had been making repeated requests for a case number regarding the matter I was attempting to formally report. They arrived without providing one, and characterized my conduct as "uncooperative" — despite the fact that my only requests were for a case number and for them to speak with Jessica Welke, to whom the original complaint had been made.
During that interaction, Krista Pye was informed about the recorded evidence, the alleged retaliation, and the abuse I had reported. The situation was clearly serious and directly implicated a corporal within that same detachment. Despite this, the interaction was not formally recorded or documented — a fact the CRCC should be able to verify through the subsequent inaction of Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen.
February 21, 2025
Krista Pye attended my residence a second time, on this occasion accompanied by Zachary Lechene (spelling uncertain) of RCMP Sheet Harbour. This visit followed a call I had placed to RCMP Sheet Harbour and Musquodoboit Harbour requesting a case number. During that call I was transferred to dispatch, where I advised that I was seeking a case number regarding a violent sexual assault and expressed concern that police retaliation might occur as a result of making the request.
Shortly afterward, Krista Pye and Zachary Lechene arrived at my residence. Rather than addressing the underlying complaint, their attendance appeared to use the MHMCT as a buffer. The involvement of MHMCT raises serious questions about who initiated that response, particularly given that Corporal Atwell — who is on audio record making dismissive statements about the allegations and asserting that Jessica Welke would never do what was alleged because she is a police officer — had already been made aware of the situation hours earlier.
During that interaction, neither Krista Pye nor Zachary Lechene permitted me to open a case or obtain a case number. Following the interaction, the two officers returned to their vehicles and were observed discussing how the incident would be recorded. The matter does not appear to have been documented in any RCMP report, nor does it appear to have been communicated to the MHMCT despite the seriousness of what had been disclosed. This is consistent with the subsequent inaction of Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen and further supports the conclusion that the matter was not properly recorded or pursued at any level of the detachment.
Audio Recording (0:29)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/OTUbijueHb8
Transcript excerpt:
- Krista: "…Your side of the story, and if you would like to give us a statement, we are more than willing to sit down with you and you can give us a statement."
- Scott: "I think you should go take a statement from my abusers at this stage, because all the information is posted to the internet — I had to do that."
- Krista: "Who are your abusers?"
- Scott: "You should go watch all the videos and you should go speak to Jessica."
- Krista: "Okay, so you are unwilling to give us a statement."
- Scott: "It is not unwilling, ma'am. I actually gave statements to 14 different officers, I posted the videos online, and I have asked you to please go after my violent abusers instead of coming here and harassing me."
The exchange is important on its own terms. Krista Pye's characterization of the interaction as uncooperative, immediately after being told that statements had already been given to 14 officers and that all evidence had been publicly posted, reflects the same pattern of institutional dismissal documented throughout this complaint. The question "Who are your abusers?" — asked at that stage, after years of documented contact with the detachment — raises its own serious questions about what was recorded and retained internally.
Sherry Charant / Chartrand (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
Sherry Charant / Chartrand attended my residence alongside Krista Pye and was therefore present for and aware of everything disclosed during that interaction — including the reported sexual assault, the related stalking concerns, and the allegation that a corporal within their own detachment was implicated in a potential cover-up.
Despite the seriousness of what was disclosed, no case number was created, the sexual assault allegation was not formally logged, and the interaction concluded without any record of the reported abuse being opened or pursued. This is not a procedural oversight in isolation — it occurred in the presence of two officers, one of whom had been explicitly told that 14 prior statements had already been given and that all supporting evidence had been posted publicly. The failure to document under those circumstances raises questions that go beyond individual conduct and are consistent with the broader pattern of deliberate non-documentation identified throughout this complaint.
Zachary Lechene (RCMP Sheet Harbour)
In February 2024, I contacted RCMP Sheet Harbour and reached Zachary Lechene. I advised him that serious incidents had occurred and requested that a case be opened. He stated that he was the only officer present at the time, that he was new, and asked if he could call me back. He never did. Audio recordings exist confirming this interaction.
February 21, 2025
Zachary Lechene attended my residence alongside Krista Pye following a call I had placed to RCMP Sheet Harbour and Musquodoboit Harbour requesting a case number regarding a violent sexual assault. During that call I had been transferred to dispatch, where I explicitly stated what I was reporting and expressed concern that retaliation might follow. Both officers arrived shortly afterward, and the interaction was handled through an MHMCT presence rather than as a response to the criminal allegation I had made.
By that point, both officers were fully aware of the history. Krista Pye had attended my residence the week prior regarding the same matter, had not opened a case, and had characterized me as uncooperative for requesting a case number. Corporal Atwell — who is on audio record dismissing the allegations and stating that Jessica Welke would never do what was alleged because she is a police officer — had also been made aware of the situation hours earlier. The question of who initiated the MHMCT response, and on what basis, has never been answered.
During the interaction, neither officer allowed me to open a case or obtain a case number. After it concluded, they returned to their vehicles and were observed discussing how the incident would be recorded. No case was opened. The sexual assault allegation was not documented. The matter does not appear to have been communicated to the MHMCT despite being the reason for the contact. This is consistent with the subsequent inaction of Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen.
Audio / Video Recording (1:51)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/gpQ1DNQGC4U
Transcript excerpt:
- Zachary: "So I'm going to give you this card — it's our Mobile Mental Health Crisis line. If at any time you feel like you need to talk to someone, or you're just feeling down, give that number a call."
- Scott: "I have no problems, actually. I have no history of mental health issues, just so you all know. Any issues you might have on record were put there by your officers and their inability to do their job. Had they simply opened a case, would we be standing here right now?"
- Zachary: "Not sure."
- Scott: "No, we wouldn't be — that's a fact. It's not a matter of not sure. If you came here with a case number, you would not be standing here right now. That is a matter of fact. Now listen — you have both been great and really nice. If you go back through the full history of this, you will see a complete record of support for police, respect, and dignity. I didn't do anything. You'll see that the police came after me. I would never even be talking to you if they hadn't done what they did. But I can't move on because the police came after me. And what I said to Justin and Chad — it's so disrespectful that they would send you out here without informing you of what actually happened, hoping you would act on bad instincts and go back and say this guy seemed agitated or uncooperative. That only works in the police's favour. The individuals who sent you know what happened. Dennis Daley is well aware of this. They are sending you here without informing you of the actual conditions of the complaint. That's the problem — and it's not with you personally. But if you don't see this as an act of intimidation, especially after the conversation we had the other day, and all I am asking for is a case number for a violent sexual assault — I am not the one being unreasonable."
The transcript is significant on multiple levels. Zachary Lechene's response of "not sure" when asked directly whether officers would be standing at my door had a case number simply been issued earlier is not a neutral answer — it is an acknowledgment that the situation was of the detachment's own making. The subsequent departure without documentation, after that exchange, reflects the same pattern of deliberate non-recording identified across every other interaction with RCMP Sheet Harbour documented in this complaint.
Sergeant Stevens (RCMP Musquodoboit Harbour) – Assigned by CRCC
Sergeant Stevens was assigned by the CRCC to handle the complaint. His involvement is directly relevant to the integrity of the subsequent record produced by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen, who later identified him as a conflict of interest in their report while simultaneously relying on his record as though it were accurate and uncontested.
March 13, 2024 — Recorded Interaction
Full URL: https://youtu.be/0FVfSFrlbXE (Length: 5:39)
This recording covers both the conduct of Carol at the CRCC and Sergeant Stevens' handling of the matter. During that interaction, Sergeant Stevens stated that none of the reported events could be addressed unless I sat in a room with him in person. I advised that this was not appropriate given the serious and documented pattern of police abuse and retaliation I had already experienced, and requested that digital submissions be accepted instead — specifically phone recordings that documented what had occurred. This request was not accommodated.
Sergeant Stevens' response to the core allegations was particularly revealing. When I asked him directly who I should take the GPS manipulation issues to, he said: the police. When I asked who I should take the sexual assault allegation to, he said: the police. This response — directing a complainant who was reporting abuse by the police back to the police — reflects either a fundamental misunderstanding of his role as an assigned CRCC investigator or a deliberate deflection. Given the context and the pattern documented throughout this complaint, the latter raises serious concerns.
I advised Sergeant Stevens directly that the matters being reported extended through his own chain of command, including Commissioner Mike Duheme and Commissioner Dennis Daley, and connected to the resignation of Dan Kinsella as Chief of Halifax Regional Police. He was therefore fully aware of the seriousness and scope of what was being raised. He was also aware that the CRCC had already failed to properly record the complaint at the first point of contact with Carol, and that the record was therefore compromised from the outset.
I also advised Sergeant Stevens that as the assigned investigator, he would be directly liable for the case if it continued to be mishandled. I asked him directly whether he was prepared to file complaints against the officers involved, including his bosses and raised the conflict of interest with him during that same interaction. The recording referenced above captures a general account of these exchanges. Sergeant Stevens' responses are not captured in that recording — however, the substance of what was communicated to him is documented, and the subsequent record he produced, combined with Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen's later acknowledgment of the conflict of interest, is consistent with the concerns I raised with him directly at that time.
The Conflict of Interest Finding
Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen subsequently identified Sergeant Stevens as a conflict of interest in their June 2025 report. That finding is significant — but what followed it was not. Despite acknowledging the conflict of interest, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen continued to rely on Sergeant Stevens' record as though it were accurate and uncontested. No independent verification of his account was conducted. No acknowledgment was made of the circumstances under which that record was created — including his refusal to accept digital submissions, his direction of the complainant back to the institution being complained about, and the fact that the conflict of interest had been raised with him directly during a recorded interaction.
The implicit reasoning appears to have been that because Sergeant Stevens was a police officer, his record could be treated as reliable regardless of the acknowledged conflict. That reasoning is circular, unsupported by any independent verification, and entirely consistent with the broader pattern identified throughout this complaint — in which officers' accounts are accepted without scrutiny while documented evidence to the contrary is disregarded.
The conflict of interest was not a minor procedural footnote. It was an acknowledgment that the officer assigned to investigate the complaint was himself embedded in the institutional structure being complained about, operating within the same chain of command as the officers whose conduct was at issue, and had been directly advised of his own potential liability during the investigation. Naming that conflict and then doing nothing about it — while continuing to use his record as a foundation for the final report — is not a finding. It is a continuation of the problem under a different label, and it calls into question the integrity of every conclusion that Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen drew from that record.
Corporal Atwell (RCMP Musquodoboit Harbour)
August 22, 2024
Corporal Atwell attended my residence with a young female officer regarding a Facebook post I had made on July 12, 2024 concerning Jessica Welke, the sexual assault allegation, and the retaliation I had reported involving RCMP Sheet Harbour. During that interaction, Corporal Atwell laughed in response to my statements about the sexual assault. I want to be clear about the context of that day: I had spent the entire day out with my grandparents, both over the age of 85. They, along with my neighbours, can attest to my behaviour and activities.
During the interaction I raised serious concerns regarding the manipulation of my GPS location, threats involving children, and the sexual assault I had reported. Corporal Atwell stated that these matters were not an issue for the RCMP. I explained that altering someone's GPS location without authorization could constitute unauthorized use of a computer system, and that if I were to set his GPS location to a known drug house, I would likely face criminal charges. I asked who I should file complaints with and understood from the conversation that Corporal Atwell would follow up with me. He did not contact me afterward and did not record these concerns in his report.
Important Note Regarding Cellular Service
I live in Ecum Secum, an area with effectively no reliable cellular service. The only way I can sometimes receive a signal is by placing my phone directly on top of a signal repeater, and even then the connection is inconsistent. Every officer who has attended my residence, every local resident, and Bell technicians who service the area are all aware of this. This fact is directly relevant to any claims made by Corporal Atwell regarding attempted contact, and it underscores why any such claims must be verified through actual phone records rather than accepted on the basis of his statement alone.
Recording 1 — September 13, 2024 (0:46)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/gDysMWEeueM
This recording captures Corporal Atwell clarifying that the reason for his August 22 attendance was solely the Facebook post about Jessica Welke — not the underlying sexual assault allegation. This is significant because it confirms that he was aware of the sexual assault report, read it, and made a conscious decision to treat the Facebook post as the matter requiring a response while leaving the sexual assault unaddressed.
Transcript excerpt:
- Scott: "…Seemingly this is all interesting information I was giving you, right? I assumed that's what you were going to do."
- Corporal Atwell: "Sorry, no. I thought I was clear — the reason I was there that day was because of the Facebook complaints made about Jessica."
- Scott: "Right. Which was brought on because of the serious issues reported in the complaint. When you read that, you read there was a sexual assault — but you're okay with that and not okay with someone being upset about a police officer. That seems strange. Because anybody would know a sexual assault is exponentially worse than anything I said."
- Atwell: "Well I'm pretty confident in our members' abilities to investigate things, but I'll have a look…"
- Scott: "So… she didn't just do it because she was a police officer?"
Recording 2 — September 13, 2024 (0:39)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/cC08LLQjN2o
This recording captures Corporal Atwell asserting that the CRCC would never have failed to record a reported sexual assault — a claim that can be directly contradicted by the documented conduct of Carol, David, and Paul at the CRCC, all of whom failed to properly record the matter on multiple separate occasions. The recording also confirms that I was attempting to explain this failure to him in real time and was not believed.
(Note: When I refer to "the corporal" in the transcript below, I am referring to Sergeant Stevens of the CRCC, not an RCMP corporal.)
Transcript excerpt:
- Scott: "That's what I mean — I reported it. When I reported it to the Civilian Review Board, the woman didn't record it. I brought it up multiple times and he didn't record it either."
- Atwell: "I can guarantee the Civilian Review Board is pretty hard on us. I can guarantee they would have created a report — they do every time someone calls."
- Scott: "But I'm telling you they didn't in this case. They didn't, sir, and I reported serious abuse towards me and my family."
Recording 3 — Atwell Confirms He Will Follow Up (0:08)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/Rjgk_FozXHs
Transcript excerpt:
- Atwell: "And if I don't reach you today then I'll try again on Monday, okay?"
- Scott: "Okay, thank you."
- Atwell: "Thank you."
- Scott: "Have a good day, bye."
Corporal Atwell did not attempt to contact me again. As a result, I was required to follow up myself. Given that he had already been informed of the sexual assault allegation at the time this commitment was made, his failure to follow through raises serious concerns. I respectfully request that any response from Corporal Atwell regarding this matter be accompanied by the relevant phone records so the timeline of contact attempts can be independently verified rather than resolved on the basis of his account alone.
Recording 4 — Atwell Claims He Has Been Trying to Call (0:08)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/IeqJ9TSHH7U
Transcript excerpt:
- Atwell: "Are you going to answer when I call?"
- Scott: "Yeah, I'm gonna—"
- Atwell: "I've been trying to call you since you called back."
This statement is incorrect. Corporal Atwell did not attempt to contact me as he claimed. My phone records show no such contact. Given the documented lack of cellular service in Ecum Secum — known to every officer who has attended my residence — this assertion is particularly concerning and further illustrates why phone records must be produced and reviewed independently rather than simply accepting the officer's statement.
During this same interaction, I was eventually required to ask Corporal Atwell to stop using what I perceived as an abusive and dismissive tone. I was attempting to report a serious matter as a victim. Instead, the interaction was framed in a way that shifted focus onto me rather than the complaint — a complaint that, if properly addressed, would have required Corporal Atwell to account for his own inaction, including laughing at the sexual assault allegation during his August 22 attendance.
Following that interaction, Corporal Atwell stated he would contact me again within five days. That contact never occurred. It can also be independently verified that no sexual assault case was ever opened through RCMP Sheet Harbour — something that would have been apparent to Corporal Atwell given everything I had already communicated and the public posts I had made documenting the situation.
Pattern of Conduct
The compromised record produced by Corporal Atwell was subsequently relied upon by Shelly Mews, who attempted to arrange a meeting that included Corporal Atwell while using his incomplete account as the basis for assessing the situation. In doing so, she extended full credibility to the officer's version of events while the supporting evidence I had provided was not afforded the same weight.
This mirrors the broader pattern involving Corporal Atwell, Cory Bushell, and Trevor Allen — in each case, the officer's account appears to have been accepted without meaningful scrutiny while my reports, evidence, and concerns were dismissed. The result was no due process and no meaningful investigation. The matter appears to have been resolved on the implicit assumption that the officers involved would not have engaged in misconduct simply because they are police officers. The repeated application of that presumption, in the face of recorded evidence to the contrary, raises serious concerns about the integrity of the entire process.
Shelly Mews (RCMP Special Victims Unit)
Following the attendances at my residence by Sherry Charant, Krista Pye, and Zachary Lechene on February 14 and February 21, 2025, I continued making repeated attempts to have a case formally opened. I contacted RCMP Sheet Harbour multiple times and spoke with the receptionist on several occasions, specifically requesting that a case be created regarding the matters I had reported.
On March 13, 2025, I contacted Shelly Mews directly to express serious concerns about what I believed to be entrapment behaviour and the overall handling of the situation. During that call I emphasized that the matter had been ongoing for approximately two and a half years, involved multiple officers across multiple interactions, and required immediate escalation. I specifically requested that the matter be escalated to Commissioner Mike Duheme and Commissioner Dennis Daley for review.
Shelly Mews did not escalate the matter. Her subsequent record of the interaction was inconsistent with what actually occurred and followed the same pattern established by Corporal Atwell's August 2024 record — producing an account in which officers could claim contact attempts had been made without providing phone records to substantiate those claims. My phone records document the communications and the consistent absence of follow-up, and directly contradict the version of events recorded by the officers involved.
When Shelly Mews eventually did contact me, it was apparent that no officers from RCMP Sheet Harbour had provided her with any meaningful context regarding the prior interactions or the complaints that had been raised. She relied on Corporal Atwell's record as the primary basis for assessing the situation and attempted to arrange a meeting between myself and Corporal Atwell at the Musquodoboit Harbour detachment — raising immediate concerns given the issues I had already formally reported regarding his conduct.
Shelly Mews did not contact me again after that. I subsequently left multiple well-organized voicemail messages containing detailed evidence. On one occasion it appears the call was briefly answered and then disconnected. After a period of time the voicemail mailbox became full due to the volume of evidence I had submitted. It was later cleared. The clearing of a full mailbox indicates the messages were received and then deleted. This raises serious concerns that direct evidence left in those recordings was removed from the record, potentially to conceal the reported conduct involving Shelly Mews, Curt Wallace, and the RCMP personnel involved in this matter.
Confirmation That the Case Was Never Escalated
My aunt independently contacted the RCMP out of concern for the situation. In response, a member of Halifax Regional Police contacted me and advised that the file remained open under Shelly Mews' name and that I was welcome to come in and provide a statement. This is significant for two reasons.
First, it confirms that Shelly Mews did not escalate the case as I had specifically requested. Had the matter been properly escalated to Commissioner Duheme or Commissioner Daley as requested, it would not have remained sitting open under her name awaiting a statement months later.
Second, it confirms that any updates provided in response to my aunt's inquiry — or to any subsequent contact — would have flowed directly back through Shelly Mews and the same compromised chain of handling that had already produced a record inconsistent with what actually occurred. The file remaining in Shelly Mews' name also means that Curt Wallace's conduct — including calling me from an unknown number, leaving no return contact information, and never mentioning Shelly Mews by name in any of his voicemails — occurred within a case she was nominally supervising. She must therefore have been aware that her own name and contact information were not being provided to me as the complainant, creating the communication loop described in the Curt Wallace section and documented in the associated audio recordings.
Please refer to the Curt Wallace section for the audio recordings confirming that no return number or reference to Shelly Mews was provided in any of his voicemail messages.
Audio Recording — Full Mailbox (0:16)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/GurTUG-7eoU
Supporting Recordings
Call to Curt Wallace and Shelly Mews requesting charges be pressed — May 3, 2025 (15:08)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/9tZoNy0to7k
Call to RCMP requesting CSIS progress on Operation DUSKHOWL (8:35)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/yC-vKKCkaxA
Call to RCMP — Conduct of Cory Bushell and CRCC review of false arrest — March 13, 2023 (1:23:48)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/EkbkumKe-Hs
Deep dive — False arrest, torture, and sexual assault — August 2, 2022 (2:34:03)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/KOE2qzYTpng
Deep dive — Police abuse, cover-up of sexual assault, connecting Postmedia to the Mueller Report (2:25:55)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/JzMIxrZlHNc
Curt Wallace (RCMP Special Victims Section)
Sergeant Curt Wallace left a series of voicemail messages on my phone. All calls came from an unknown number. At no point in any of these messages did Sergeant Wallace provide a return phone number, alternative contact information, or any method by which I could reach him directly. No specific time or date for follow-up was established in any of the messages, while the call came from an unknown number.
Voicemail Recordings — Sergeant Curt Wallace (1:17)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/ENnW9Z-K1rw
Transcript of voicemails:
- "Hi Scott, it's Sergeant Curt Wallace calling from the Special Victims Section. I'm just calling to speak with you in relation to file number 25219595. I will give you a call back later on in the day, hopefully touch base then. Thank you, bye."
- "Hi Scott, Sergeant Curt Wallace calling you again from the Special Victims Section. I'm going to continue to call you throughout the day, hopefully I can connect with you. Anyway, we'll touch base hopefully later on today. Thank you."
- "Hi Scott, it's Sergeant Wallace calling you back again. I'll continue to try again throughout the day. Thank you. Bye."
Because no return number was provided in any of these messages, the only practical option available to me was to contact Shelly Mews directly — which I did as soon as I was able, as documented in the recording below. Those calls went immediately to voicemail every time. The mailbox subsequently became full and was later cleared, confirming the messages were received and then deleted.
Full Response — Calling Shelly Mews' Line and Playing Sergeant Wallace's Voicemails (11:35)
Full URL: https://youtu.be/nIo_XfMHyek
Despite this documented sequence, the records produced by Shelly Mews and Curt Wallace indicate that contact attempts were made and imply that I failed to respond. The recordings demonstrate that this characterization is not accurate. Sergeant Wallace provided no return contact information, and Shelly Mews' line went directly to voicemail on every attempt. Without these audio recordings, the record would suggest that I was unresponsive — which is precisely how the pattern identified throughout this complaint operates.
For this reason, any statements from Shelly Mews or Curt Wallace regarding contact attempts must be accompanied by the relevant phone records so the timeline can be independently verified. The audio evidence already establishes what occurred. The phone records would either confirm it or require those officers to account for the discrepancy directly.
Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen (RCMP)
After more than 800 days had passed since the complaint was first filed, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen opened a CRCC case on June 1, 2025 and closed it four days later on June 4, 2025 — without contacting me, without taking written statements from any of the officers involved, and without conducting any meaningful investigation into the sexual assault allegations that had been repeatedly reported.
Cory Bushell himself acknowledged that the complaint was outside the mandated response timeframe, that no recorded statements had been taken from the officers involved, and that Sergeant Stevens — the original RCMP officer assigned to the matter — represented a conflict of interest. Despite those findings, the case was closed after four days with no remedy, no accountability, and no contact with the complainant.
The CRCC is aware of this and has confirmed that no RCMP investigation was carried out. Their own letter states:
"Mr. Jewers, I would like to offer a sincere apology for the length of time it took to finalize this public complaint. It is beyond the mandated response time to complete a Public Complaint investigation and to provide a Final Report. We will strive to provide a timelier response in the future."
What followed that apology is equally important: the CRCC still did not act, did not take the matter seriously, and later used my follow-up emails asking for a basic status update as grounds to reprimand me. An institution that cannot meet its own mandated timeframes by more than 800 days, produces no investigation, and then criticizes the complainant for asking where things stand has inverted the purpose of an oversight body entirely.
This sequence — opening a file for four days after 800 days of inaction, closing it without contact, and producing no written statements from any officer including Jessica Welke — effectively stripped me of any right to due process while the underlying sexual assault allegation was ignored entirely. The records produced during that four-day window appear designed to create a plausible institutional paper trail while ensuring no meaningful legal accountability attached to any of the conduct that had been reported. The CRCC took no action despite being aware that serious abuse had occurred.
Written Rebuttal — July 9, 2025
A full written review and rebuttal of the records produced by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen, submitted to the CRCC on July 9, 2025, is available at:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bde4y9hb Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/July9th2025_Response_to_RCMP_June-6_Letter_and_CRCC_Investigation_Request.html
Video Review
Full URL: https://youtu.be/EkbkumKe-Hs (1:23:48)
Omissions in the Record Involving Jessica Welke
The audio recordings of my interactions with Krista Pye, Sherry Charant, and Zachary Lechene at RCMP Sheet Harbour clearly document me reporting the sexual assault and specifically identifying Jessica Welke by name, asking that officers speak with her directly. Those recordings exist and are referenced elsewhere in this submission.
When Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen subsequently contacted Jessica Welke, there appears to be no reference in the resulting record to the sexual assault allegations or to the prior documented interactions. This omission is particularly concerning given that Corporal Welke was the commanding officer of the Sheet Harbour detachment — meaning she was effectively the supervising officer for every other officer named in this complaint who attended my residence and failed to document the allegations. The officers who declined to open a case, characterized me as uncooperative, and failed to record the sexual assault were all operating within a detachment she commanded. It is not reasonable to conclude she had no awareness of the matter given the frequency of my contact with that detachment and the seriousness of what was being reported on each occasion.
No formal written statement appears to have been taken from Corporal Welke at any point. The record produced by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen is vague on the substance of their contact with her, and the sexual assault allegation does not appear to have been directly put to her in any documented way. In the absence of a written statement, there is no record of what she was asked, what she said, or whether the core allegation was raised at all.
On July 27, 2023, I attended RCMP Sheet Harbour wearing a body camera and submitted detailed evidence regarding these matters. That interaction is recorded and documented. On July 17, 2024, I observed what appeared to be surveillance activity involving four RCMP vehicles shortly after a Facebook post made on July 15, 2024 referencing Jessica Welke. Neither of these documented interactions appears to have been reflected in the records produced by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen.
Instead, the available record appears to focus primarily on a mental health narrative, without any corresponding evidence of a substantive investigation into the sexual assault allegation, the documented pattern of non-recording across multiple officers, or the evidence that had been repeatedly provided. The substitution of a mental health framing for a criminal investigation — applied consistently, across multiple officers, multiple detachments, and an extended period of time — is itself a finding that warrants serious scrutiny and cannot reasonably be attributed to coincidence or individual oversight.
Mike Duheme — RCMP Commissioner of Canada, Dennis Daley — RCMP Commissioner of Nova Scotia Brenda Lucki — RCMP Commissioner of Canada (through 2023)
Institutional Awareness Prior to August 2, 2022
The broader record demonstrates that senior RCMP leadership had visibility into the issues being raised well before many of the later events occurred. Since at least 2021, numerous posts were made on Facebook making direct requests for escalation and tagging RCMP Nova Scotia and RCMP Canada directly. Significantly, the RCMP stated in September 2021 that they were aware of and monitoring the complaint thread. That acknowledgment establishes that the organization had notice of the concerns being raised at an early stage and chose not to act on them through proper channels.
The available documentation also demonstrates that I made extensive efforts to resolve the situation through appropriate channels and to avoid the circumstances that led to my attendance at HRP on August 2, 2022. On July 28, 2022 — three days before that date — I made a public request for all parties to come forward and specifically stated that I would be checking email headers. Within two days of making that request, I received what appeared to be a phishing or hacking attempt originating from a domain associated with Valent Legal. The email triggered Bitdefender security alerts and appeared suspicious. I examined the headers and warned Valent Legal that the message appeared to be coming from within their own domain, advising them to contact their IT department. Valent Legal subsequently confirmed it was a phishing attempt. The headers were also analyzed using multiple AI models — including Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude — all of which indicated the message originated from a domain associated with Valent Legal.
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/mu55m6k8 Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2022-07-29_Showing%20i%20asked%20to%20contact%20me%20and%20said%20i%20could%20check%20email%20headers%20related%20to%20valent%20legal%20hack%20august%201st%202022.png
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/yc6k4576 Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_August%2001%202022%20-%20Phishing%20Attempt%20From%20Valent%20Legal.jpg
Significant spikes in Google Analytics activity and the locking of several accounts correlate with suspected hacking incidents involving Bushell's Lightning Protection and Bushell's LLP in September 2021, as well as the Valent Legal activity on July 28, 2022 — days before my false arrest, torture, and sexual assault on August 2, 2022.
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/24rk38fv Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-02_Google%20Analytics%20from%202021%20and%202022,%20dates%20showing%20my%20account%20locked%20and%20that%20they%20tried%20to%20delete%20EMCI%20contracts%20.jpg
August 2022 — RCMP Attendances During a Period of Serious Personal Hardship
Following the events of August 2, 2022, RCMP officers attended my residence on August 16, August 17, November 24, and December 21, 2022. This is not intended to be a complete list. These visits occurred during a period in which my mother was seriously ill in hospital and I was physically injured, including suffering severe blisters on my feet as a result of the events of August 2. The attendances contributed significantly to the distress I was already experiencing and are consistent with the broader pattern of ongoing harassment documented throughout this complaint.
During this same period I directly requested that RCMP Sheet Harbour escalate the matter to Commissioner Brenda Lucki's office. I stated clearly to Chad Samford that if a case was opened and Commissioner Lucki's office contacted me directly, I would stop my public documentation efforts. No escalation occurred. No case was opened. Officers continued attending my property while denying my right to have the sexual assault allegations, the retaliation, and the related national security concerns properly investigated.
October — November 2022 — HRP Vote of No Confidence and EMIC Contracts
Following my false arrest, torture, and sexual assault on August 2, 2022, the Halifax Regional Police Association held a historic vote of no confidence in October and November 2022 — something that had never previously occurred within Halifax Regional Police. 84% of HRP members participated, and 96.6% voted no confidence in Chief Dan Kinsella. This demonstrates that members within HRP itself believed that serious problems existed within the leadership and operations of the organization — at precisely the same time I was presenting substantial documented evidence regarding the matters I had been reporting.
On October 26 and November 6, 2022, emails were sent to hundreds of recipients including Halifax Regional Police, advising that EMIC contracts were being removed from the federal government website. The RCMP subsequently acknowledged that they had reviewed those emails and confirmed that nothing in them was threatening and that the messages appeared to be raising a legitimate concern. Despite that acknowledgment, RCMP officers continued attending my residence in a manner I believe constitutes ongoing harassment and retaliation.
The start dates of those EMIC contracts correspond directly with the start date of Dan Kinsella's tenure as Chief of Police for Halifax Regional Police, further linking these timelines.
EMIC contracts — publicly searchable:
Full URL: https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/?sort=contract_date+desc&search_text=EMIC&page=1
Images of emails and recipients — October 26 and November 6, 2022: Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/4zpbn3pr Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2023_08_30/2022-08-2_Proof%20EMIC%20contracted%20existed%20August%2029th%202022%20and%20Sepotember%2015th%20but%20as%20of%20October%2026th%202022%20they%20cant%20be%20found.jpg
EMIC contracts and Dan Kinsella start date correlation: Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/26tvzcu8 Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/Media/Resources/Added_2026_03/2019-07-05_EMIC%20Dan%20Kinsella%20Land%20Registration%20Dates.png
June — September 2023 — Public Documentation and Institutional Responses
On June 30, 2023, I launched www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com, publicly documenting the full evidentiary record. On July 27, 2023, I attended RCMP Sheet Harbour and RCMP Sherbrooke in person on body camera and provided both detachments with detailed evidence and direct reference to the website. All parties were therefore on clear and documented notice that serious abuse had been reported and that substantial supporting evidence existed.
Body camera footage — July 27, 2023 (25:49):
Full URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9qzi7-6Ag8
On August 31, 2023, I was served by the Nova Scotia Health Authority regarding an incident they claimed occurred on August 22, 2023 — nine days earlier. The notice falsely alleged that I had been present at an NSHA location. By separating the service date from the alleged incident date, the burden was effectively placed on me to disprove the claim. I have consistently maintained that I was not present. This concern was raised with the RCMP on multiple occasions. NSHA did not contact me to clarify or investigate the matter. I maintain that the Nova Scotia Health Authority was at that time generating false and retaliatory records following the complaints I had filed with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia regarding the severe abuse I had experienced, including the sexual assault allegations.
On September 6, 2023, Dan Kinsella announced his retirement as Chief of Halifax Regional Police.
On September 7, 2023, the Honourable Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Public Safety, announced the establishment of a Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions.
On September 19, 2023, Commissioner Dennis Daley announced that there would be an apology for Street Checks — an issue directly linked to prior policing practices involving Halifax Regional Police, including matters associated with Dan Kinsella and the broader timeline of policing practices and oversight in Nova Scotia.
Escalation Requests — Duheme, Daley, and the Suppression of Evidence
Shelly Mews was specifically and repeatedly asked to escalate the matter to Commissioner Mike Duheme and Commissioner Dennis Daley given the volume and quality of the evidence provided. That escalation never occurred. The file remained open under Shelly Mews' name, as confirmed when Halifax Regional Police contacted me in response to my aunt's inquiry — meaning any updates flowing from that file would have gone directly back through the same compromised chain of handling.
It is also relevant to note that Stephen McNeil, former Premier of Nova Scotia, and Robin McNeil, former HRP member and Acting Chief of Police of the Halifax Regional Police during the relevant complaint period, are brothers. Members of their family have been employed throughout HRP. This raises additional and independent concerns about conflicts of interest in how this matter has been handled at the institutional level.
With respect to the CRCC, I repeatedly requested that Paul escalate the case to Commissioner Duheme and Commissioner Daley due to the seriousness of the issues involved. The relevant RCMP accounts and groups were tagged in public posts, meaning the information and supporting evidence were clearly visible to RCMP leadership throughout this period. The evidence posted publicly included references to the abuse, retaliation, sexual assault allegations, Tim Houston, the CSIS case number, EMIC, and Kristen Holm in relation to NSHA, along with the associated audio recordings and documentation.
When Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen opened a file on June 1, 2025 — despite acknowledging the complaint was outside their mandated timeframe — the website already contained the full evidentiary record including the sexual assault allegations and extensive supporting documentation. That evidence appears to have been omitted from the record they produced. The case was closed four days later without a single recorded statement from any officer involved.
Given that Commissioner Duheme and Commissioner Daley were being named in escalation requests, that the matter had been widely posted publicly with RCMP accounts tagged, and that the RCMP had itself acknowledged reviewing related correspondence as early as 2021, the handling of this complaint raises serious questions about whether the record was properly examined and whether the process was conducted in good faith at any level of the command structure.
All parties — including the CRCC — had full knowledge of who was implicated. The consistent pattern of non-documentation, non-escalation, and selective record-keeping across every institution named in this submission is not consistent with oversight failure. It is consistent with intentional suppression.
Legal Framework — Applicable Provisions
The conduct documented throughout this submission does not represent a series of isolated administrative failures. Taken together, the pattern of non-documentation, fabricated contact attempts, procedural neutralization of a criminal allegation, and institutional dismissal across both the RCMP and the CRCC engages specific statutory obligations and legal standards. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the provisions and principles that apply to the conduct described in this submission.
RCMP Act, RSC 1985, c R-10
Section 36.2(e) imposes a statutory duty on every member to ensure that improper or unlawful conduct by any member is not concealed or permitted to continue. This obligation is not discretionary. Every officer at RCMP Sheet Harbour who attended my residence, was informed of the sexual assault allegation, and failed to document or report it upward was in potential breach of this provision. The word "every" is significant — it applies regardless of seniority, role, or whether the officer was the primary responder.
Section 40(1) provides that when it appears a member has contravened the Code of Conduct, a conduct authority shall make or cause to be made any investigation necessary to determine whether a contravention occurred. The use of the word "shall" renders this a mandatory obligation, not a discretionary one. The decision by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen to open a file for four days after more than 800 days of inaction — without taking a single written statement from any officer involved, including the officer at the centre of the allegation — is a direct failure to meet this mandatory standard.
Section 45.5 provides that CRCC members are protected from liability only for actions taken in good faith. Where the record demonstrates a consistent pattern of failures to document disclosures, dismissals without investigation, misrepresentation of interactions, and reliance on officers' unverified accounts while documented evidence was disregarded, the good faith protection does not apply. This provision is directly relevant to the conduct of Carol, David, and Paul at the CRCC as documented in this submission.
Section 45.53 governs the public complaints process. The CRCC may decline to deal with a complaint only where it is trivial, frivolous, vexatious, or made in bad faith. That standard operates in both directions. A complaints process conducted in bad faith by the institution — one that produces a record designed to neutralize a legitimate complaint rather than investigate it — engages the same standard and can be raised before the Chairperson and before the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency on that basis.
RCMP Regulations, SOR/2014-281 — Code of Conduct
Section 8.3 requires every member to take appropriate action if the conduct of another member contravenes the Code and to report that contravention as soon as feasible. Every officer at RCMP Sheet Harbour who was present during an interaction in which the sexual assault allegation was raised, and who failed to document it or report it through proper channels, was in potential breach of this provision. This includes interactions documented on audio recording where officers were directly informed of the allegation and responded by characterizing the complainant as uncooperative rather than opening a case.
Canadian Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46
Section 139 — Obstruction of Justice applies where a person wilfully attempts to obstruct, pervert, or defeat the course of justice. The documented pattern of non-documentation across multiple officers at multiple detachments over an extended period, combined with the fabrication of contact records and the deletion of voicemail evidence, raises questions that engage this provision. This is noted here not as a conclusive finding but as a matter that warrants independent review by an authority with investigative jurisdiction.
Section 122 — Breach of Trust by a Public Officer applies where a public officer, in connection with the duties of their office, commits fraud or a breach of trust, whether or not it would otherwise be an offence. The conduct of officers who produced records misrepresenting their interactions with me — including records that omitted the sexual assault allegation entirely despite it having been explicitly raised during those interactions — is potentially engaged by this provision.
Common Law — Misfeasance in Public Office
The tort of misfeasance in public office applies where a public officer engages in deliberate and unlawful conduct in the exercise of their public functions with awareness that the conduct is unlawful and likely to cause harm to the plaintiff. The two-part test established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse [2003] 3 SCR 263 is directly applicable to the conduct documented in this submission. That case involved RCMP officers who failed to cooperate with a Special Investigations Unit following a shooting — the Court found that deliberate failure to fulfill statutory duties, in the knowledge that harm would result, could ground liability in misfeasance. The parallel to the present matter is direct.
Canadian Human Rights Act, RSC 1985, c H-6
The systemic failure to investigate a reported sexual assault, combined with the repeated substitution of a mental health response for a criminal investigation process, engages provisions prohibiting discriminatory practices in the provision of services customarily available to the general public. The right to have a criminal allegation properly investigated is a service provided by the RCMP to the public. The documented pattern of non-response raises questions about whether that service was withheld in a manner that engaged protected grounds under the Act.
Note to the CRCC
The provisions listed above are illustrative, not exhaustive. This submission does not purport to constitute a complete legal analysis. It is intended to place the CRCC, the Chairperson, and any reviewing authority on notice that the conduct documented herein engages specific statutory obligations and legal standards — and that the characterization of this matter as an administrative complaint about response times does not accurately reflect the nature or seriousness of what is being reported. The existence of audio recordings, phone records, website analytics, and documentary evidence submitted to CSIS under Attachment 5566 means that the factual record is not dependent solely on the complainant's account. It can be independently verified. The question is whether the institutions responsible for that verification are willing to do so.
Distribution List — Recipients of This Submission
This submission has been simultaneously delivered to the following recipients. Delivery confirmations are being tracked as part of the evidentiary record. The full submission, including all referenced recordings and supporting materials, is publicly accessible at www.TheWolfAndTheNeuralNetwork.com.
Oversight and Regulatory Bodies
Complaints-CRCC — complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca Elections Canada — Info50@elections.ca Elections Nova Scotia — elections@novascotia.ca Public Interest and Future of Institutions — Info@pifi-epie.gc.ca Public Interest and Future of Institutions — conf@pifi-epie.gc.ca Information Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia — oipcns@novascotia.ca Canadian Human Rights Commission — info.com@chrc-ccdp.gc.ca Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission — hrcinquiries@gov.ns.ca Nova Scotia Policy and Communications — POLCOM@novascotia.ca Jason Mighton, Nova Scotia Government — Jason.Mighton@novascotia.ca INFO_CEF_CCE — INFO_CEF_CCE@cef-cce.ca CSIS Attachment 5566 — Attachment5566@smtp.gc.ca NSIRA — info@nsira-ossnr.gc.ca Citizen Lab — inquiries@citizenlab.ca
Law Enforcement
RCMP National Security Information Network — RCMP.NSIN-RISN.GRC@rcmp-grc.gc.ca HRP Professional Standards — hrpprofstand@halifax.ca HRP General Contact — contacthrp@halifax.ca City Watch Halifax — citywatch@halifax.ca
Federal Members of Parliament
Justin Trudeau — justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca Mark Carney — mark.carney@parl.gc.ca Jagmeet Singh — Jagmeet.Singh@parl.gc.ca Pierre Poilievre — pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca Harjit Sajjan — Harjit.Sajjan@parl.gc.ca David Lametti — David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca Gary Anand — gary.anand@parl.gc.ca Sean Fraser — Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca
Provincial Premiers
Nova Scotia — premier@novascotia.ca Quebec — premierministre@quebec.ca Ontario — premier@ontario.ca New Brunswick — premier@gnb.ca Manitoba — premier@manitoba.ca British Columbia — premier@gov.bc.ca Prince Edward Island — premier@gov.pe.ca Saskatchewan — premier@gov.sk.ca Alberta — premier@gov.ab.ca Newfoundland and Labrador — premier@gov.nl.ca Northwest Territories — premier@gov.nt.ca Yukon — premier@yukon.ca Nunavut — pakeeagok6@gov.nu.ca
Media — CBC
CBC Nova Scotia — cbcns@cbc.ca CBC News Toronto Tips — torontotips@cbc.ca CBC Vancouver — cbcnewsvancouver@cbc.ca CBC New Brunswick — cbcnb@cbc.ca CBC Radio News — radionews@cbc.ca CBC Montreal — assignmentmontreal@cbc.ca CBC Compass — compass@cbc.ca CBC Saskatchewan — sasknews@cbc.ca CBC Calgary — calgarynewstips@cbc.ca CBC Edmonton — newsedmonton@cbc.ca CBC North — cbcnorth@cbc.ca CBC Nunavut — nunavut@cbc.ca CBC Yukon — cbcyukon@cbc.ca CBC Fifth Estate — fifthtips@cbc.ca CBC Go Public — gopublic@cbc.ca CBC Fredericton — infoamfredericton@cbc.ca CBC Metro Morning — metromorning@cbc.ca Brett Ruskin, CBC — Brett.Ruskin@cbc.ca Geoff Leo, CBC — geoff.leo@cbc.ca
Media — CTV / Bell
CTV News App — ctvnewsapp@bellmedia.ca CTV W5 — w5@ctv.ca W5 Bell Media — w5@bellmedia.ca CTV News Channel — newschannel@ctv.ca Atlantic News Bell Media — atlanticnews@bellmedia.ca Bell Media News Online — newsonline@bellmedia.ca Bell Media News — news@bellmedia.ca Avery Haines, Bell Media — avery.haines@bellmedia.ca Sandie Rinaldo, Bell Media — sandie.rinaldo@bellmedia.ca
Media — Global / Postmedia / Other
Global News Halifax — halifax@globalnews.ca Global News Calgary — calgary@globalnews.ca David Pugliese, Postmedia — dpugliese@postmedia.com Halifax Examiner — matthew@halifaxexaminer.ca Chris Alexander — chris@chrisalexander.ca The CIC — media@thecic.org
Legal
Cox and Palmer Halifax — halifax@coxandpalmer.com Patterson Law — contactus@pattersonlaw.ca Valent Legal — amy@valentlegal.ca Valent Legal General — info@valentlegal.ca BWB LLP — firm@bwbllp.ca Boyne Clarke — info@boyneclarke.ca Pink Larkin — nwall@pinklarkin.com Stewart McKelvey Halifax — halifax@stewartmckelvey.com Henein Hutchison — mhenein@hhllp.ca McInnes Cooper — david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com
Political
Claudia Chender MLA — ClaudiaChenderMLA@gmail.com Zach Churchill — ca@zachchurchill.com
Irving Shipbuilding
Jim Rennie, Irving Shipbuilding — Rennie.Jim@irvingshipbuilding.com James Perrin, Irving Shipbuilding — Perrin.James@irvingshipbuilding.com
Crown Counsel / Professional Standards
Professional Conduct CPSNS — professionalconduct@cpsns.ns.ca Crystal Morgan, CPSNS — cmorgan@cpsns.ns.ca Suzanne Husbands, CPSNS — shusbands@cpsns.ns.ca
Other
Robert Wright — robertseymourwright@gmail.com Scott Jewers — thewolfandtheneuralnetwork@gmail.com Scott Jewers — jewers.scott@gmail.com