Paul,
Now I understand why you didn’t respond for eight months — even knowing that the issues I was reporting included threats against children and disabled women, break and enters, audio recordings of RCMP threats, sexual assault, and national security matters confirmed by CRCC’s own transmissions to the RCMP extending through mid-2023.
CRCC Review and Behavioral Analysis:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn
On October 30, 2024, you stated that you had read all of my submissions. That means you knew I was consistent in what I was reporting. You knew there were audio recordings, detailed records, reports of sexual assault, reports involving the Premier, break and enters with multiple witnesses. You knew that Carole had made serious errors in her April 12, 2023 transmission — and that David had done the same on August 16, 2024, producing a record that failed to document the abuse. At that point, you had direct knowledge that both Carole and David had made serious mistakes. The decision to branch cases 2023-1031 and R2024-005807 ensured that the answers to your own questions would never be transmitted to the RCMP — and gave CRCC Review the ability to claim plausible deniability. Even seeing your questions without my answers would have created serious problems for 2023-1031.
Questions and Answers: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/May10th2025_CRCC_Detailed_Submission.html
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/ykjvbzma
I submitted those answers on May 25, 2025. They were not added to 2023-1031. Instead, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen opened 2023-1031 seven days later, closed it within four days on June 4, 2025, never gathered statements from Jessica, and never contacted me. CRCC Review then accepted the case for review on July 17, 2025 — but a loophole was already in place. The video review and rebuttal I submitted regarding Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen was 83 minutes long, and the accompanying document was 63 pages:
Video: https://youtu.be/EkbkumKe-Hs
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/7ckd6v3p
The CRCC Review acceptance letter — which I only received after the fact — states that only 60 minutes of video and 60 pages of documents are accepted. That limit was used to retroactively discard material I had already submitted, including a video with “sexual assault” in the title.
At that stage, you already knew the RCMP had rejected 2023-1031 and that I had submitted answers to your questions on May 25, 2025. You did not respond until February 10, 2026 — over eight months later. During that period, I sent follow-up requests every two weeks, consistent with industry standard practice. I received nothing: no responses, no confirmations, no acknowledgement that anything had been transmitted to the RCMP.
Compare this to the process under Carole and 2023-1031: initial transmission to the RCMP with a 45-business-day response window, and a transmission confirmation every time I contacted CRCC. The Commission’s own service standards state:
“The Commission forwards public complaints it receives to the RCMP. 10 business days from the date when all the necessary information has been provided to the Commission.”
Service Standards: https://www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/en/services/service-standards
When you did finally respond on February 10, 2026 — eight months after CRCC accepted review of 2023-1031 — you answered none of my questions, addressed none of the escalation issues, and provided no guidance. You had been sitting on detailed answers to your own questions since May 25, 2025, knowing a sexual assault had been reported along with everything else. Instead, you cherry-picked a single submission from December 16, 2025, issued a reprimand about video length — for a video with “sexual assault” explicitly in the title — and provided nothing of substance.
Deep Dive into False Arrest, Torture, and Sexual Assault on August 2nd 2022: https://youtu.be/KOE2qzYTpng
The Structural Context
The CRCC Review service standard provides 120 business days from the date the RCMP provides requested files. When CRCC Review replied on April 8, 2026, they confirmed four things:
CRCC Response from April 8, 2026: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-08_Update_From_CRCC_Review_On_2023-1031.html
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/585szu47
1. There is no sitting Chair. My cases can sit in limbo indefinitely with no decision-maker to hold accountable. “Decisions about complaints reviewed by the Commission are made by the Chairperson… the Commission will not be able to issue a report about your complaint until a decision-maker is appointed.”
2. The RCMP provided their materials on or about August 20, 2025 — establishing when the 120-day clock began.
3. The letter is signed by the Complaint Intake and Review Directorate — the same unit you stated on October 30, 2024 that you manage within. Both cases were therefore within your professional proximity when their decision was made.
4. Sexual assault, election interference, and national security issues are outside the scope of the review. This confirms the purpose served by branching the cases: those subjects had to be kept out of 2023-1031 to keep the review manageable and the outcome controllable.
Counting 120 business days from August 20, 2025 reaches February 12, 2026. Your response came on February 10, 2026 — two days before the standard would have been breached. Given your position within the same directorate, you had reasonable visibility into the Review’s timeline and outcome. Your conduct on February 10th — the dismissive tone, the fixation on minor procedural complaints, the complete silence on substantive issues — is consistent with someone who already knew the result and believed the matter was effectively closed.
The Pattern of Conduct
The pattern across every point of contact at CRCC has been consistent: Carole, David, Cory Bushell, Trevor Allen, and now you. Each interaction produced a record that deflected from the substance of the complaints, created procedural grounds for dismissal, and left no accountability trail. Carole’s April 12, 2023 transmission created the original opening. Every subsequent actor has maintained and extended it.
In your case specifically, the record shows: fixation on an image attachment; no engagement with substantive content; questioning why I asked questions about your own questions; attempts to limit communication on any available pretext; and explicit downplaying of a CSIS case number (Attachment5566) — despite the associated email address, Attachment5566@smtp.gc.ca, appearing on the thread in every interaction. A CSIS case number in a CRCC complaint is not a routine occurrence. Treating it as a minor administrative detail is a choice, not an oversight.
Where Things Stand
I now have a comprehensive documented review of CPSNS, HRP Professional Standards, and CRCC, supported by audio recordings and transcripts. I have Sergeant Stevens on audio in 2023 stating that these matters should go to police — recorded while I was telling him they had already been reported to Jessica and other officers multiple times.
This record is visible to senior RCMP officers, media, government officials, lawyers, NSIRA, CSIS, and the public — on this thread and across social media. ATIP requests will capture everything that exists internally.
There are two possible outcomes for 2023-1031. If CRCC Review sided with me, the institutional failure is confirmed on the record. If they did not, the documented conduct outlined above becomes the record — and it stands regardless of that finding. Either way, the documentation is complete and it is not going away.
Required Action
You are required to forward a copy of this letter to your HR department. The most senior ranking official currently active at the CRCC is to contact me directly to confirm that both 2023-1031 and R2024-005807 are being addressed.
A copy of this letter has been posted to social media, and the HTML version can be found at:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/yakvfptr
Scott Jewers
For Posterity and Completeness
All CRCC Correspondence To And From:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/All%20CRCC%20Follow%20ups.html
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/3xaeexvv
CRCC Review and Behavioral Analysis:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn
HRP Professional Standards Review and Evidence:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/vdw35bda
CPSNS Formal Complaint and Evidence:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/4jys92vj