Paul,
Now I see why you didn't respond for 8 months, even knowing I was reporting threats against children and disabled women, break and enters, audio recordings of RCMP threats, sexual assault, and national security issues which are confirmed by CRCC's own transmissions to RCMP going back through mid-2023.
CRCC Review and Behavioral Analysis:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn
Back on October 30, 2024, you said you read all my submissions and so you saw I was consistent in what I was reporting. You knew there were audio recordings, detailed records and reports of sexual assault, reports about the Premier, break and enters with multiple witnesses. So you knew Carole made serious mistakes April 12, 2023 in her transmission. While David completely botched the record on August 16, 2024, and did exactly what Carole did. At that stage you saw Carole and David had made serious mistakes in not recording the abuse. So to avoid accountability you branched cases 2023-1031 and R2024-005807 to ensure the questions you asked me would never be sent to RCMP, and so CRCC Review could claim plausible deniability — because even seeing your questions without the answers would have caused serious problems for 2023-1031.
Questions and Answers:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/May10th2025_CRCC_Detailed_Submission.html
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/ykjvbzma
I submitted those answers on May 25, 2025. You didn't add them to 2023-1031 — Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen just suddenly opened 2023-1031, 7 days later, and closed the case within 4 days on June 4, 2025, never gathered statements from Jessica, and never contacted me. So now you, CRCC, and RCMP all get to blame me, and you are the victims for receiving emails right? CRCC Review then accepted the case for review on July 17, 2025, but there was a loophole ready for you. The video review and detailed rebuttal I submitted regarding Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen was 83 minutes while the detailed document itself was 63 pages:
Video: S4E5 Call to RCMP — The Fraud of Cory Bushell and the CRCC Review of False Arrest – March 13th 2023:
Rebuttal:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/7ckd6v3p
But the CRCC Review acceptance letter — which I only received after the fact — states they only accept 60 minutes of video and 60 pages of documents. You and CRCC Review no doubt used that to retroactively discard the video evidence, and possibly the rebuttal itself, since it was embedded.
At that stage you already knew the RCMP had rejected 2023-1031 and I had submitted answers to your questions on May 25, 2025. But you didn't respond until February 10, 2026, which was over 8 months later. In that time frame I sent follow-up requests every two weeks, an industry standard, but you never responded. With Carole and 2023-1031, the process involved initial transmission to RCMP by CRCC with a 45-business-day response window, and I received a transmission confirmation every time I contacted CRCC. With you and R2024-005807, I got nothing for 8 months — no responses, no confirmations that anything was ever transmitted to RCMP, and no acknowledgement — while the CRCC Service Standards state: "The Commission forwards public complaints it receives to the RCMP. 10 business days from the date when all the necessary information has been provided to the Commission."
https://www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/en/services/service-standards
And here's where it gets really interesting: when you finally did respond on February 10, 2026 — 8 months after CRCC accepted review of 2023-1031 — you didn't answer any questions, didn't address the escalation issues, and provided no guidance, even though you had been sitting on detailed answers to your own questions since May 25, 2025, knowing a sexual assault had been reported along with everything else. Instead, you cherry-picked a single submission from December 16, 2025, reprimanded me for the length of a video that had the sexual assault right there in the title. Much like I suspect CRCC Review did with the rebuttal.
Deep Dive into False Arrest, Torture, and Sexual Assault on August 2nd 2022:
So why would you feel so brazen as to retaliate against someone reporting serious abuse including sexual assault and who had a CSIS case number?
It started to make more sense when I found the CRCC service standard. They have 120 business days from when the RCMP provides CRCC the requested files. When CRCC Review finally replied on April 8, 2026, they gave me four critical pieces of information:
CRCC Response from April 8, 2026:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/585szu47
1. They confirmed there is no sitting Chair, meaning my cases could sit in limbo for years — and that there would be no one to hold accountable for what's been done. "Decisions about complaints reviewed by the Commission are made by the Chairperson... the Commission will not be able to issue a report about your complaint until a decision-maker is appointed."
2. They confirmed when the RCMP provided their materials, and when the 120-day clock started: "We received the RCMP's materials on or about August 20, 2025."
3. Their signature states Complaint Intake and Review Directorate. You stated on October 30, 2024 that you are a manager within Complaint Intake — meaning you work closely with the same unit, can reasonably see both cases, and could see their decision.
4. They confirmed that sexual assault, election interference, and national security are outside the scope of the review — which confirms exactly why you branched the cases.
So let's put this together. You knew there was no oversight, the cases could sit in limbo for years, and there would be no accountability for your actions. If you count 120 business days from August 20, 2025 to your reply on February 10, 2026, that's 118 business days — two days short of breaching the service standard. CRCC likely rushed the case through to stay technically compliant, and given that you're a manager within the same directorate, you could see their decision — and may well have influenced it. The fact that you came back with the attitude you did on February 10, 2026 tells me they didn't side with me. You thought you could use 2023-1031 to push back on R2024-005807, drive an IPTA narrative, and claim some kind of investigation had been done when it clearly hadn't — and you figured I'd have no recourse, with no director, no Chair, and cases potentially buried for years.
All you needed to protect yourself was a self-serving internal summary where you were always the victim. So you made excuses about everything — fixating on an image attachment, ignoring substantive content, questioning why I asked questions about your questions, trying to limit communication on any pretext you could find. You even downplayed a CSIS case number (Attachment5566) while their email address — Attachment5566@smtp.gc.ca — was right there on the thread in every interaction — and I can guarantee nobody has ever come to CRCC with a CSIS case number before. Every excuse served the same purpose: build an internal record where you were just a manager receiving difficult emails, so you could push an IPTA narrative. That's exactly what Carole, David, Cory Bushell, and Trevor Allen did before you. Carole gave you a way out right from April 12, 2023 in her first botched transmission. You needed to stay consistent — and figured that with no directors and no Chair, you couldn't be held accountable.
But here I am with a detailed review of CPSNS, HRP Professional Standards, and CRCC — with audio recordings and transcripts. I even have Sergeant Stevens on audio in 2023 stating these topics should go to police while telling him they were reported to Jessica and other officers multiple times.
All while senior RCMP officers, media, government, lawyers, NSIRA, CSIS, and the public can see it — on this thread and on social media. You can't hide it anymore. CRCC covering up systemic abuse, racism, sexual assault, national security issues, election interference, police retaliation, planted GPS evidence — it's all there. And I can and will ATIP request every record you have.
There's no good outcome for you here. If CRCC sided with me in 2023-1031, the cover-up is confirmed on the record. If they didn't, I'm still here — and you've now seen exactly how thoroughly I've documented your conduct. You don't get to run the same play twice. Everything you do from this point forward will be used against you.
You will forward a copy of this letter to your HR department, and have the most senior ranking official currently working at the CRCC contact me to ensure both 2023-1031 and R2024-005807 are being addressed.
A copy of this letter has been posted to social media, and the HTML version can be found at:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/yakvfptr
Scott Jewers
For posterity and completeness
All CRCC Correspondence To And From:
https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/All%20CRCC%20Follow%20ups.html
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/3xaeexvv
CRCC Review and Behavioral Analysis:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdfvehvn
HRP Professional Standards Review and Evidence:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/vdw35bda
CPSNS Formal Complaint and Evidence:
Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/4jys92vj