2026-04-08_Response_Regarding_Misconduct_Of_Paul_And_CRCC.docx
2026-04-08_Response_Regarding_Misconduct_Of_Paul_And_CRCC.docx

Paul,

A detailed review of the CRCC and your conduct can be found below this letter.

I need to address your conduct and the manner in which this investigation has been handled. It is clear that portions of my submissions have been selectively extracted and framed to support a narrative in which you and the CRCC are portrayed as the aggrieved party, rather than accurately reflecting the substance of what was provided and the actions taken by both you and the CRCC.

The record demonstrates a pattern of omission, mischaracterization, and failure to act on material evidence — including repeated reports of sexual assault — which raises serious concerns regarding negligence and obstruction in the handling of this matter.

Your approach raises serious concerns about how individuals reporting significant matters — particularly allegations of sexual assault and abuse — are treated within this process. The handling of this matter is precisely why victims do not come forward. The RCMP closed a case without even contacting the victim, and instead of addressing that failure, the focus of this process has been redirected toward reprimanding my communications and requests for follow-up rather than investigating the underlying conduct.

I requested updates approximately every two weeks. You did not provide a substantive response for eight months. Rather than addressing those failures, your response has been to mischaracterize my communications and reframe the record in a way that obscures them.

If a report of sexual assault were handled this way within your own office — with no action taken for over 1,000 days — it would warrant investigation by the RCMP. That same standard must apply here.

I ask directly:

  • What steps did you take to engage with the officers involved?
  • What steps did you take to ensure that the reported sexual assault was documented and investigated?
  • What steps did you take to follow up with the CRCC Review unit?

Based on the record, these steps do not appear to have occurred. Instead, scrutiny has been directed at me, despite the fact that the underlying issues have been extensively documented and provided in a structured, independently verifiable format — including audio recordings, a CSIS case reference, and the CSIS email address present on all correspondence, with explicit direction to forward evidence for monitoring.

Have you contacted CSIS regarding this matter? Have you reported the detailed national security issues regarding EMIC and the documented GPS anomalies? There is no indication that you have. Regardless of the quantity or quality of evidence provided, every step taken by you and the CRCC has served to portray yourselves as victims of receiving emails, rather than engaging with the substance of what has been submitted — while reprimanding a victim in a matter that has now extended beyond three years.

I am formally requesting that this correspondence be placed on the record and forwarded to your HR department. I am also notifying you that I am proceeding with a formal complaint to the RCMP requesting a criminal investigation into obstruction and negligence in the handling of this matter. A copy of this correspondence, along with the full documented record, will be provided to the CRCC Review unit, media contacts, legal counsel, and the Government of Canada.

If additional victims of sexual assault come forward in connection with the matters outlined in this record, I will pursue further action and accountability with respect to any failures to act, including retaining counsel, and will pursue legal action to prevent the CRCC from inflicting this kind of abuse on other victims in the future.

A HTML Version of this letter can be found at

Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-08_Response_Regarding_Misconduct_Of_Paul_And_CRCC.html

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/2e63y7k7

Scott Jewers

A Review of CRCC Correspondence — March 27, 2023 to July 17, 2025

An approximate record of all CRCC correspondence from March 27, 2023 to present can be found at: Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/3xaeexvv Full URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/All%20CRCC%20Follow%20ups.html

It should be noted that Paul is not a frontline intake agent. He confirmed in writing on October 30, 2024 that he is a manager of the Commission's intake office, and is therefore responsible for the conduct of CRCC intake staff including Carole, David, and Rebecca.

The CRCC has established formal service standards under section 45.37 of the RCMP Act requiring the Commission to issue either a Satisfied Report or an Interim Report within 120 business days of receiving all relevant material. The CRCC accepted this case for review on July 17, 2025. As of March 20, 2026, approximately 169 business days had elapsed — approximately 49 business days beyond the Commission's stated standard.

March 2023 — Original Complaint

CRCC file 2023-1031 was opened on March 24, 2023. That complaint clearly outlined multiple forms of abuse including break and enter, threats, assault, and involvement of EMIC contracts, and included direct quotations from police officers and audio recordings involving Jessica Welke.

Carole did not record the substance of that complaint. In her response of May 17, 2023 she stated that the RCMP had acknowledged the complaint on April 19, 2023 and would be in contact within 45 days — indicating a contact date of approximately June 3, 2023. No one contacted me.

May 25, 2023 — EMIC Referenced in CRCC's Own Letter

The CRCC's own letter dated May 25, 2023 explicitly references EMIC, demonstrating that the Commission was fully aware of the companies involved and the alleged connections to Cambridge Analytica. The letter further records that another officer had to place his hand on Jessica Welke's shoulder and ask her to stop, and states:

"He then specified that it was the same female officer who had said something along the line of 'don't you think it's something you're not supposed to know,' as noted in his original public complaint when he tried to report that his GPS location showed as being at an alternate location (not his point of contact), which he appears to link to the EMIC contracts."

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/295bmbu5

This is consistent with the audio recording of May 24, 2023 involving Jessica Welke, in which a voice can be heard stating "Good" after I outlined the abuse and threats made against me, and in which I explicitly state that I felt terrorized. Shortly thereafter, on May 27, 2023, I received a call from MHMCT — which directly aligns with those statements and raises serious concern regarding how the report was being characterized internally.

July 27, 2023 — Sexual Assault Reported in Writing

In my July 27, 2023 submission I again explicitly referenced the sexual assault. The CRCC acknowledged receipt and stated that the information was forwarded to the RCMP. Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/mrjyrjnf

August 4, 2023 — CRCC Minimization of Sexual Assault

Rebecca, an intake agent with the CRCC, referenced the incident only as an "assault" despite it having been reported as a sexual assault and explicitly raised on July 27, 2023. The CRCC's stated position at this stage was:

"The role of the Public Complaint Investigator is not to conduct criminal investigations into reports of abuse, assault, break and enter or any other criminal offences."

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bdesexwz

September 6, 2023 — Sexual Assault Again Explicitly Referenced

In my September 6, 2023 submission I again explicitly referenced the sexual assault. The CRCC acknowledged this and confirmed the information was forwarded to the RCMP. Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/mrjyrjnf

September 13, 2024 — Recorded Call with Corporal Atwell

The following audio recordings were provided directly to the CRCC on March 16, 2026.

Recording 1 — Corporal Atwell acknowledging and dismissing the sexual assault
Full URL: https://youtu.be/gDysMWEeueM

Scott: “Right. Which was brought on because of the serious issues reported in the complaint. When you read that, you read there was a sexual assault — but you're okay with that and not okay with someone being upset about a police officer. That seems strange. Because anybody would know a sexual assault is exponentially worse than anything I said.”
Atwell: “Well I'm pretty confident in our members' abilities to investigate things, but I'll have a look…”

Recording 2 — Corporal Atwell claiming the CRCC would never fail to record a sexual assault
Full URL: https://youtu.be/cC08LLQjN2o

Scott: “That's what I mean — I reported it. When I reported it to the Civilian Review Board, the woman didn't record it. I brought it up multiple times and he didn't record it either.”

Atwell: “I can guarantee the Civilian Review Board is pretty hard on us. I can guarantee they would have created a report — they do every time someone calls.”

Scott: “But I'm telling you they didn't in this case. They didn't, sir, and I reported serious abuse towards me and my family.”

Recording 3 — Corporal Atwell falsely claiming he would follow up
Full URL: https://youtu.be/Rjgk_FozXHs

Atwell: “And if I don't reach you today then I'll try again on Monday, okay?”
Scott: “Okay, thank you. Have a good day, bye.”

Corporal Atwell did not contact me as stated. When I returned the call, he claimed he had attempted to reach me; however, this is not supported by my phone records and raises concern that a false record was being constructed. I have repeatedly requested that the CRCC obtain phone logs from Corporal Atwell, Jessica Welke, Shelly Mews, and Curt Wallace to verify these claims. That request has not been acted upon.

It is also relevant that Corporal Atwell operates out of a detachment adjacent to Jessica Welke — the central subject of the complaint — raising additional concerns regarding independence and potential conflict of interest.

Sergeant Stevens — Assigned Investigator

When Sergeant Stevens contacted me, there was no reference to the reported sexual assault. We did discuss the GPS location being set to 9330 Highway 7, Stillwater, NS, the audio recordings involving Jessica Welke, and the publicly available evidentiary record. I have audio recordings of Sergeant Stevens explicitly stating that these matters should be referred to the police — yet all of this was omitted by Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen in their subsequent investigation, and Jessica Welke was never questioned.

Sergeant Stevens later claimed he had attempted to meet with me multiple times. This is false. I clearly stated I would only provide submissions digitally or by telephone due to the documented pattern of police abuse and retaliation. It was not reasonable to expect me to attend a police detachment under those circumstances. Sergeant Stevens never once asked me to complete a public complaint form.

The CRCC's December 19, 2023 correspondence reflects this directly:

"After being threatened, falsely arrested, terrorized by Police... would any of you drive in there and trust him when he can't even tell me who to report the issues to while claiming he doesn't investigate them?"

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/bddkr7mu

The CRCC's summary of that interaction misrepresents what was said. Their characterization protects the investigator while obscuring the actual concern raised. The December 19, 2023 submission also explicitly requested contact from a senior official — a request that was not acted upon.

April 3, 2024 — Further Submission After Four Months of Silence

In the more than four months leading up to April 3, 2024, no one from either the RCMP or the CRCC contacted me. I made a further submission requesting resignations and clearly stating that children, a disabled woman, and cancer patients had been threatened. That submission included images of RCMP vests found at a suspected drug drop site, documentation of multiple instances of being stalked by RCMP including while protesting racism, and a newspaper article corroborating that conduct with witnesses — despite living approximately 40 km from the nearest RCMP station.

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/ms8f3my6 Short URL — RCMP vest image: https://tinyurl.com/yux2xdd4 Short URL — Newspaper front page: https://tinyurl.com/rycaz93u

April 11, 2024 — CRCC Acknowledges Submission

The CRCC provided an attachment acknowledging the April submission and confirmed receipt of my fax dated March 28, 2024 — a formal request for a Crown Prosecutor to investigate the matter. I had also physically delivered that request to the Crown office.

Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/t9m5nbkf

March 13, 2024 — Public Demonstration Outside Sheet Harbour Detachment

On the anniversary of my second false arrest I walked through Sheet Harbour carrying signs asking how my phone's GPS was set to 9330 Highway 7, Stillwater, NS and stood across from the RCMP detachment. I had also reported the matter to Zachary Lechene of RCMP Sheet Harbour in February 2024.

Short URL — Demonstration video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IGtnHlru40

August 22, 2024 — Corporal Atwell Attends Residence

Corporal Atwell of RCMP Musquodoboit Harbour attended my residence as a result of a Facebook post made July 15, 2024 regarding Jessica Welke and the reported abuse. During that interaction he laughed about the sexual assault, laughed about the GPS anomaly, and dismissed the other reported abuse. He stated he would follow up but never did.

September 13, 2024 — Recorded Call with Corporal Atwell

Three audio recordings were provided directly to the CRCC on March 16, 2026.

Recording 1 — Corporal Atwell acknowledging and dismissing the sexual assault: https://youtu.be/gDysMWEeueM

Recording 2 — Corporal Atwell falsely claiming the CRCC would never fail to record a sexual assault: https://youtu.be/cC08LLQjN2o

Recording 3 — Corporal Atwell falsely claiming he would follow up: https://youtu.be/Rjgk_FozXHs

Corporal Atwell did not contact me as stated. I have repeatedly requested that the CRCC obtain phone logs from Corporal Atwell, Jessica Welke, Shelly Mews, and Curt Wallace to verify these claims. That request has not been acted upon. Corporal Atwell also operates out of a detachment adjacent to Jessica Welke, raising additional concerns regarding independence and conflict of interest.

August 30, 2024 — Call with David at CRCC

I spoke with David from the CRCC. I explained that Carole had failed to record the abuse I reported. His response was: "Carole wouldn't do that" — despite the record clearly showing the abuse had not been properly documented.

September 16, 2024 — CRCC Closes File Without Reference to Sexual Assault

The CRCC responded without any reference to the sexual assault and closed the file after confirming only that Trevor Allen had been asked to contact me. This allowed Cory Bushell, Trevor Allen, and CRCC staff to again point back to the complainant as the problem, despite the sexual assault allegation having been clearly in their records since early 2023.

October 3, 2024 — New Submission Merged Into Closed File

David acknowledged receipt of an online submission dated October 3, 2024 and merged it into file 2024-3291, which was already closed — effectively obscuring the substance of what had been raised by burying it in a closed file.

October 30, 2024 — Paul Sends Five Pages of Questions

Paul from the CRCC sent approximately five pages of questions, with full awareness that the correspondence thread included media organizations, legal firms, oversight bodies, political representatives, and all provincial and territorial premiers.

May 10, 2025 — Detailed Answers Submitted

Having received nothing further from Paul or the CRCC, on May 10, 2025 I submitted detailed answers to Paul's October 30, 2024 questions. Paul's response was to advise that future submissions should be limited to 6 pages — despite his own questions having run to approximately 5 pages. If his questions required 5 pages to ask, the matters being raised are by definition complex enough to require a detailed response. The 6-page limit applied to answers but not to questions — an asymmetry that functionally disadvantages the complainant.

June 3, 2025 — Request for Policy Clarification

I asked Paul to clarify the policy basis for the 6-page limit. Paul did not respond.

June 4–6, 2025 — RCMP Final Report Received

On June 6, 2025 I received the RCMP letter from Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen confirming they had opened the case on June 1, 2025 and closed it on June 4, 2025 — four days — without contacting me, without reference to the evidence submitted, without any mention of the sexual assault, and while acknowledging the matter was outside their mandated timeframe. This was over 800 days after the original complaint was filed.

Cory Bushell stated in writing:

"Mr. Jewers, I would like to offer a sincere apology for the length of time it took to finalize this public complaint. It is beyond the mandated response time to complete a Public Complaint investigation and to provide a Final Report."

The report confirmed Sergeant Stevens had been identified as a conflict of interest and the investigation reassigned to Sergeant Allen. Sergeant Stevens never recorded any of the abuse or sexual assault, and his claim that I refused to cooperate is directly contradicted by the record. Critically, Cory Bushell and Trevor Allen did not take any written statement from Jessica Welke or any other officer involved.

A detailed rebuttal to the RCMP final report: Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/uawbhwr8

July 9, 2025 — Formal Review Request Submitted

I submitted a formal request to the CRCC portal asking that the case be reviewed, including videos, the written rebuttal, and the full chronological history.

July 17, 2025 — CRCC Review Unit Acknowledges Receipt

The CRCC Review unit confirmed receipt and advised that relevant information had been requested from the RCMP. The 120 business day service standard clock began running from the date all relevant RCMP materials were received — a date the Commission has still not confirmed in writing despite being formally asked.

July 18, 2025 to February 10, 2026 — 142 Business Days Without Response

From July 18, 2025 until February 10, 2026 — 142 business days, 208 calendar days — neither Paul, the CRCC, nor the CRCC Review responded. During this period I submitted follow-up requests on August 7, August 21, August 28, September 5, September 11, September 16, September 25, October 2, October 9, October 18, October 23, October 31, November 6, December 16, 2025, and January 23, 2026 — a total of 15 follow-ups over 208 days, averaging one every approximately 14 days.

On February 10, 2026, Paul finally responded. Rather than addressing the substance of the issues raised, his response reprimanded me for sending follow-up communications — despite the presence of serious concerns including a reported sexual assault and national security issues, and despite the CRCC already being outside its own service standards.

February through March 2026 — Mischaracterization and Merging of Complaints

On February 21, 2026 I submitted multiple complaints against different officers. On February 24, 2026 Paul advised they would be merged — creating a situation where all complaints could be dismissed collectively rather than assessed individually.

On March 18, 2026 I responded to the CRCC's questions indicating I had several clarifying questions before providing full answers. Paul replied on March 20, 2026 stating that if I was not going to answer their questions the CRCC would proceed regardless — a misrepresentation, as I had not refused to answer but had sought clarification.

Paul's subsequent response did not engage with the substantive points raised. Instead he isolated an attached image of Google Analytics data and threatened to limit communication — disregarding the broader context and evidence provided.

March 27, 2026 — CPSNS Formal Complaint Submitted

I submitted a detailed complaint to CPSNS and included the CRCC on the thread. That submission provided a comprehensive breakdown of both IPTA arrests and associated records including screenshots, links, and video evidence.

Full HTML URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-03-27_CPSNS_Formal_Complaint_and_Request_for_Independent_Investigation.html Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/4jys92vj

April 7, 2026 — HRP Professional Standards Complaint Submitted

I submitted a detailed complaint to HRP Professional Standards concerning Patrick Curran, Ron Legere, and Jonathan Jefferies in relation to the false arrest and subsequent events involving NSHA. This document directly ties to the CPSNS submission of March 27, 2026 and the two are intended to be reviewed in tandem.

Full HTML URL: https://www.thewolfandtheneuralnetwork.com/HTMLDocuments/2026-04-07_Detailed_Complaint_HRP_Professional_Standards.html Short URL: https://tinyurl.com/vdw35bda

Tiny URL Mapping to Full URLs: